ADDENDUM TO THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERING A TRANSACTION’S HISTORY (EDITED 12/3/2012) - UPDATED

Mr. Mogul, this post was intended to be a follow-up to comment # 3 from 12/4/2012 on the COMMENTS 1 Page as well as to the post THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERING A TRANSACTIONS’S HISTORY (EDITED 12/3/2012) - UPDATED, however, the amount of material contained necessitated otherwise.
If you are relying on those who network to involve themselves in a Proprietorship (with a specific legal definition), by using such methods as: 1) ensuring that a simple order is produced with deliberate mistakes in the name of the business when clearly the order form contained no such inconsistencies (see below copies of the order for the 2005 Conservery calendars), 2) have

the corrupted order delivered on the 22^nd day of the month and approximately one month later a “coincidental” dividend check delivered (see the above photos a 2004 MVEC Dividend check/communication dated 10/22/2004). The innacuracies warranted follow-up corrective action (see below photo of follow-up action needed); in my opinion, carried out to give an individual with no of

 

a 2004 MVEC Dividend check/communication dated 10/22/2004). The innacuracies warranted follow-up corrective action (see below photo of follow-up action needed); in my opinion, carried out to give an individual with no

Date of receipt was 9/22/2004 instead of 10/22

connection to this residence here in Iowa, except through quid pro quo deal-making a connection for the fake heritage concocted for a con artist in an all expenses paid trip to Disney in Orlando as previously documented on this Blog's pages, 3) perpetrate mail fraud repeatedly to obtain social security “legitimacy” and replacing a simple get well card mailed to an ex Governor with other contents (see the post GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD-FASHIONED WAY UPDATED FOR AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY) and 4) the entering of a locked vehicle to plant evidence and cover-up their previous crime, see the post HOW ARE STONEGATE THROUGH 140^TH AVE OLIN CONNECTED?), just to mention a few of the “illustrious” activities of your “Society’s” types; then you skating on very, very, very, very thin ice on, which to base your support for not being “RECKLESS IN THE HOPE FOR (non-existent) RATIONALITY” (or legitimacy”) and/or your operating standards for conducting business are “thin” as previously mentioned. This action is inconsistent with that character of the careful investor who does stray in “unknown” areas, which you “portray for the cameras”. As previously stated, you are past straying and are waist deep in a perpetual wealth-generating scheme from, which you are incapable of realizing how far out on a limb you are such that conflicts of interest prevent you from making the "rational" decision you typically advocate, thereby proving that your words are “hollow” indeed!