Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

CONSERVERY'S PHOTO CHALLENGE


BOTH SIDES HAVE BEEN HEARD FROM IN THIS CHALLENGE AND ITS TIME TO MAKE A DECISION. SIMPLY PURCHASING EQUIPMENT OF A WELL PUBLICIZED HOBBY OF AN INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY CHANGE THE IDENTITY OF ANY INDIVIDUAL, AND ADVERTISING DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY LEND AUTHENTICITY TO ANY INDIVIDUAL WHETHER POSSESSING “TWO FACES”, CON ARTIST OR ANY OTHER. FURTHERMORE, RESORTING TO UNETHICAL METHODS TO INTIMIDATE MY SON AND I INTO ACCEPTING OTHER IDENTITIES DICTATED BY “SOCIETY’S” TYPES USING THEIR USUAL METHODS (THUGGERY ETC), DOES NOT CHANGE THE IDENTITIES OF “VIRTUAL” IMPOSTORS. THE CHALLENGE IS THIS, FOR THOSE CLAIMING THE EXACT PATH AS ME SHOULD IDENTIFY THE PHOTOS AS REQUESTED OR MOVE ASIDE AND REFRAIN FROM UNETHICAL PRACTICES TO “OBTAIN” IDENTITIES BY HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION ETC.

 

 
JAMES F. BRAZANT TOOK ALL THE PHOTOS IN PHOTO CHALLENGE IN HIS WALK OVER THE YEARS AND ANY INDIVIDUAL CLAIMING MY WALK SHOULD BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT OCCURRED IN THE LIFE OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.
 
For the Answer to this Question, see the Conservery Blog Post
 
 
 
For the Answer to this Question, see the Conservery Blog
 
 
 
THE FINAL TWO (2) PHOTOS ARE DEPICTED BELOW TO COMPLETE THIS PHOTO CHALLENGE:
 
 
THE CHALLENGE IS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL(S) CLAIMING MY EXACT WALK, IS TO LEAVE ON THIS PAGE COMMENTS ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS AS DOCUMENTED AND IF YOU CANNOT MOVE ASIDE AND REFRAIN FROM PRETENDING TO BE ORIGINALS AS THIS MASQUERADE HAS TO COME TO AN END. 

2 comments:

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

SINCE "SOCIETY'S" TYPES ARE SO GOOD AT MANUFACTURING, REPRODUCING, AND REPLICATING EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE AWARE OF, HOW COME IF YOU HAVE LIVED THE EXACT LIFE OF JAMES F. BRAZANT, YOU CANNOT REPLICATE EITHER OF THE TWO CHALLENGES ON THESE PAGES WITHOUT ATTEMPTING TO RELY ON IDENTITY CRUTCHES? COULD IT BE, THAT YOU CANNOT BECAUSE YOU ARE IN FACT THE FRAUDS YOU REALLY ARE AND HAVE REACHED YUR LIMITS TO GOING ANY FURTHER?