RESULTS FOR MARCH 3 & 14, 1988 FROM CONSERVERY CHALLENGE PAGE
When all else fails, “Society’s” types and other Club Supporters resort to all types of “Trojan Horse” games and tricks enacted by paid supporters, but I am going to stick to the facts, since I don’t have the resources to pay any individual to support my cause in this fashion. This is the final installment of the Conservery Challenge, providing the answers those who have claimed to be in all these various locations at the same time, in a never ending sequence of stories about their “history” (or lack thereof), could not. It is now clearly obvious you could NOT have known about this requested evidence simply (as a certain Mogul types like to keep things) because you were unavoidably detained elsewhere. Both the dates March 3 & 14, 1988 are associated with one of my last projects completed successfully at The Kerite Company. THE MOISTURE RESISTANCE TEST OF R-79 INSULATION as documented in a Report of the same title dated August 22, 1988 (see below photo of page 1 of the Memo Report and associated Requisitions). (The date of this six-months test report is a coincidence, for those who use labels
In summation of these last two Challenge dates, the correct response is the R79 CABLE INSULATION PROJECT and the associated CABLE INSULATION STANDARD/DIELECTRIC REPORTS REQUISITIONS from 3/3/1988 and 3/14/1988. Both are needed for the answer to be considered correct. There is no partial credit here!
In addition, the words of an individual not “hollow” in my opinion are applicable here as follows; SUCCESS VERSUS VALUE, which should be the objective of most? The answer is provided in the following description. “TRY NOT TO BECOME A PERSON OF SUCCESS, BUT RATHER BECOME A PERSON OF VALUE. PERSONS ARE CONSIDERED SUCCESSFUL IN THESE DAYS WHO GET MORE OUT OF LIFE THAN THEY PUT IN. BUT A PERSON OF VALUE WILL GIVE MORE THAN THEY RECEIVE AND TYPICALLY THEIR REWARD COMES IN A MANNER THAT IS TOTALLY UNEXPECTED.”
That is why with unlimited resources, it is possible to discover the when, where and possibly the how about required information (and claim success). However, without the why details, which are the most critical, it is impossible to claim another’s actions, especially when numerous documents exists placing such individuals in numerous other locations, (via such “trivial” documents as Annual Company Reports, SEC Annual Filings, etc., in a different identity but with the same “face”.) Many take these documents lightly because of obviously drawing the conclusion that such are not very important since they are not read and as a result “stories” can be changed to suit whatever direction is currently convenient) but where is the value? This is an invalid premise, regardless of whose support is being relied upon for “legitimacy” because the critical part of any “partnership”, “venture”, “union”, “challenge” etc. is the most valuable part and what passes for success is not a reliable measure to lay claim to any objective, as used by “Society’s” “yardstick”. THE WHY OR VALUE PART IS THE MOST DESIRED, ALWAYS.
For the answer to March, 14, 1985 Challenge question, see comment # 1 from November, 29, 2012 on the COMMENTS 1 Page.
Finally, the question introduced on Day 6 and reiterated on Day 26 of the Challenge regarding any connection between these results and the Lighthouse Project Corporation's office, the answer is: THE OFFICE FURNITURE, WHICH WAS USED TO FURNISH THE OFFICE WAS DONATED BY MY FORMER PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT, THE KERITE COMPANY! (WHICH ANYONE ACTUALLY CONNECTED IN REALITY, WOULD HAVE KNOWN). However, I tried to keep the focus on the evidence itself instead of allowing the "shadowy Society's" types to invent various scenarios focusing on LPC, which I'm sure was attempted, instead of addressing the central questions at hand. In any event, they could not because they were not involved helping to place this whole scenario in perspective, namely: TIME, RESOURCES AND UNETHICAL PRACTICES DO NOT ALTER HISTORICAL FACTS.
Regarding the identity related issues, which were the basis for the Challenge, the post ISN'T IT TIME FOR A DIFFERENT FACE as well as the topics on the CONSERVERY'S BLOG generally, helped bring a sense of clarity and perspective to this on-going saga.
When all else fails, “Society’s” types and other Club Supporters resort to all types of “Trojan Horse” games and tricks enacted by paid supporters, but I am going to stick to the facts, since I don’t have the resources to pay any individual to support my cause in this fashion. This is the final installment of the Conservery Challenge, providing the answers those who have claimed to be in all these various locations at the same time, in a never ending sequence of stories about their “history” (or lack thereof), could not. It is now clearly obvious you could NOT have known about this requested evidence simply (as a certain Mogul types like to keep things) because you were unavoidably detained elsewhere. Both the dates March 3 & 14, 1988 are associated with one of my last projects completed successfully at The Kerite Company. THE MOISTURE RESISTANCE TEST OF R-79 INSULATION as documented in a Report of the same title dated August 22, 1988 (see below photo of page 1 of the Memo Report and associated Requisitions). (The date of this six-months test report is a coincidence, for those who use labels
 |
| A Dielectric is Another Technical Term for Certain Components that Comprise an Insulation System |
and numbers as an indication of “legitimacy”): On both those dates, notable events are documented in this test as having occurred and the above Requisitions for 3/3/1988 and 3/14/1988 attest to the on-going research being carried out in support of the Project). As previously noted, NO MAKE-UPS ARE ALLOWED ONCE THE EVIDENCE RESULTS ARE ISSUED (such as using back door methods to try to generically connect to Connecticut when you were documented to be elsewhere in the Midwest in one version of you “histories”, reportedly “climbing the corporate ladder to the top”).
In summation of these last two Challenge dates, the correct response is the R79 CABLE INSULATION PROJECT and the associated CABLE INSULATION STANDARD/DIELECTRIC REPORTS REQUISITIONS from 3/3/1988 and 3/14/1988. Both are needed for the answer to be considered correct. There is no partial credit here!
In addition, the words of an individual not “hollow” in my opinion are applicable here as follows; SUCCESS VERSUS VALUE, which should be the objective of most? The answer is provided in the following description. “TRY NOT TO BECOME A PERSON OF SUCCESS, BUT RATHER BECOME A PERSON OF VALUE. PERSONS ARE CONSIDERED SUCCESSFUL IN THESE DAYS WHO GET MORE OUT OF LIFE THAN THEY PUT IN. BUT A PERSON OF VALUE WILL GIVE MORE THAN THEY RECEIVE AND TYPICALLY THEIR REWARD COMES IN A MANNER THAT IS TOTALLY UNEXPECTED.”
That is why with unlimited resources, it is possible to discover the when, where and possibly the how about required information (and claim success). However, without the why details, which are the most critical, it is impossible to claim another’s actions, especially when numerous documents exists placing such individuals in numerous other locations, (via such “trivial” documents as Annual Company Reports, SEC Annual Filings, etc., in a different identity but with the same “face”.) Many take these documents lightly because of obviously drawing the conclusion that such are not very important since they are not read and as a result “stories” can be changed to suit whatever direction is currently convenient) but where is the value? This is an invalid premise, regardless of whose support is being relied upon for “legitimacy” because the critical part of any “partnership”, “venture”, “union”, “challenge” etc. is the most valuable part and what passes for success is not a reliable measure to lay claim to any objective, as used by “Society’s” “yardstick”. THE WHY OR VALUE PART IS THE MOST DESIRED, ALWAYS.
For the answer to March, 14, 1985 Challenge question, see comment # 1 from November, 29, 2012 on the COMMENTS 1 Page.
Finally, the question introduced on Day 6 and reiterated on Day 26 of the Challenge regarding any connection between these results and the Lighthouse Project Corporation's office, the answer is: THE OFFICE FURNITURE, WHICH WAS USED TO FURNISH THE OFFICE WAS DONATED BY MY FORMER PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT, THE KERITE COMPANY! (WHICH ANYONE ACTUALLY CONNECTED IN REALITY, WOULD HAVE KNOWN). However, I tried to keep the focus on the evidence itself instead of allowing the "shadowy Society's" types to invent various scenarios focusing on LPC, which I'm sure was attempted, instead of addressing the central questions at hand. In any event, they could not because they were not involved helping to place this whole scenario in perspective, namely: TIME, RESOURCES AND UNETHICAL PRACTICES DO NOT ALTER HISTORICAL FACTS.
Regarding the identity related issues, which were the basis for the Challenge, the post ISN'T IT TIME FOR A DIFFERENT FACE as well as the topics on the CONSERVERY'S BLOG generally, helped bring a sense of clarity and perspective to this on-going saga.
No comments:
Post a Comment