Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

COMMENTS 2


On August 27, 2014 at 2:01:00 PM CDT by J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1
I DO RECOGNIZE THAT THE DEVELOPMENTS MENTIONED IN THE PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING THE CAPTION IN THE PHOTO MAY NOT BE NECESSARILY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE LOCATION, AND THOSE INVOLVED. THIS OUTLOOK IS BEING REMEMBERED AND THIS SCENARIO IS BEING VIEWED FROM THIS PERSPECTIVE GOING FORWARD. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LATEST UPDATE AS WELL AS AVAILABLE LINK AND PHOTOS ARE ACCESSIBLE VIA THE COMMENTS (YEAR, AS APPROPRIATE) PAGE. on THE TIME HAS COME 



ON 3/25/2014 at 8:19:00 PM CDT FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

There has not been any submittal by me to the state of Iowa regarding the opening of another business here in this State (after the closing of the Conservery office here), about a potential generic business concept discussed in the Change of Services position document issued by me on February 1, 2013. on CONSERVERY FINAL UPDATE REGARDING STATE CRITERION - EDITED



ON 3/20/2013 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

Mr. Franz was hired in my opinion based on my assessment of the developments that occurred, to place inaccurate information about me in my files (basically, his job was to state behind my back in my files that he found me unqualified even though he knew this to be false) to put it bluntly, by using deception as his basis and for, which he was "rewarded" handsomely and would justify my eventual lay off. Those developments mentioned include: 1) subtle harassment as documented in the post ONE TOO MANY "COINCIDENCES" - THE FINALE UPDATED AND EDITED, 2) my demotion from Group Leader under the guise of a plant reorganization in 1994 for, which he was given a 100% performance assessment (as the annual report with financial details about Officers of the Company documented), 3) Mr. Franz's deception employed the use of the Emergency Preparedness Process to personally target me with some task not typically carried out and basing his prejudged outcome on me taking the time to check and ensure that information conveyed by me was the appropriate information (because I was aware of his purpose), 4) my eventual lay off after refusing to participate in an obviously fraudulent "efficiency" plant wide program, which targeted my area (Program Engineering) and in, which I was expected to reapply for the same position I was carrying out unassisted for years, 5), the plant wide efficiency program was ended once applied to my Area only, and 6) networking everywhere applications were carried out afterwards while searching for part time employment initially after being laid off to permit focusing on my Proprietorship's activities to make sure that the same inaccurate information Franz was hired to initiate was illegally spread (or when contacted for employment verification), and/or placing others in the organizations contacted based on your application thus making you appear to be an "impostor" and the impostors legitimate, ensuring that hiring in anything resembling your background does not occur again and implement identity switching, as intended. 
If others are claiming the same exact history as another individual, those perpetrating this hoax have to find a way to disparage the individual from whom the qualifications are being pilfered, and that is why this Pennsylvania Plant Manager (with the Control Room sleepers and whose Plant was closed by regulators for an extended time as a result, was hired as Nuclear V.P., just months after I was because no "credible" individual would attempt such a sham). Once he carried out his function, then those lying in wait felt free to carry out their intended identify transfer plan, in order that others could walk away with easily obtained, history, qualifications, identity and accomplishments after the needed work was all done in the preceding ten (10) years and the files cleaned up of course! on ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED



ON  2/8/2013 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

PLEASE NOTE: FOR THOSE WHO ARE OF THE OPINION THAT FREQUENTING PAST ESTABLISHMENTS ARE AN INDICATION OF LEGITIMACY, MY OLD HORIZON FS (PROPANE ONLY) ACCOUNT WAS CLOSED YEARS AGO. on FREQUENTING PAST ESTABLISHMENTS AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY - UPDATED



ON 1/12/2013 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

I am sure that the State of Iowa is not expecting me to submit another Tax and Use Business Permit cancellation (as shown in this post) for my closed Proprietorship here in Iowa just because a certain con artist was allowed to reopen a closed IRA account at US Bank after receiving an illegal Cash Balance Pension Class Action settlement after last Fall’s election. on CONSERVERY FINAL STATUS UPDATE REGARDING STATE CRITERION - AMENDED 



ON 12/31/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

This amendment of the previous post does not indicate that this Blog is in favor of the lawsuit tactics of various entities as documented. This update was carried out to provide background about the industry for the record and the methods employed by either delivery package “giant” to refrain from the appearance of taking one specific side over the other. This Blog still does not support the use of lawsuit tactics (as documented) just as it does not support other corporate tactics that allow corporations to act as entitled dictatorial entities (with a “voice”), such as over voting. on UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES RULE THE DAY AMENDED



ON 12/27/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 2
Those who resort to IDENTITY MASKING AND/OR SWITCHING techniques must have taken a Page from the recently enacted Financial Overhaul legislation that allow hedge-fund managers to mask or shield the identities of their funds. This legislation required a larger group of such fund managers to register with the SEC disclosing details about their funds, managers, brokers and auditors as a result. These managers resorting to masking the identities of their funds in larger numbers to evade prying eyes. These “Society’s” types with their alter egos employ the same IDENTITY MASKING technique but illegally, while “forgetting” that such a practice is not allowed outside the hedge fund investment world. on HOW TO STEAL WITHOUT VIOLATING COPYRIGHT MATERIAL CRITERIA (UPDATED)




COMMENT # 1
 PLEASE NOTE: MY FORMER EMPLOYER DOES NOT IN ANYWAY "SPEAK" ON BEHALF OF EITHER ME OR MY PROPRIETORSHIP & AS A RESULT SHOULD NOT IN ANYWAY BE INVOLVED IN ANY MATTERS CONCERNING CONSERVERY IN ANY MANNER., SHAPE OR FORM AS IT WAS DEVELOPED BY ME AS A PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL NOT RELYING ON THIS ENTITY OR ANY OTHER FOR A "VOICE". THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPRIETORSHIP'S AUTHORIZATION. on WHAT WAS OVERLOOKED IN THE FREE SPEECH DEBATE





ON 12/26/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 2
The use of "secondary boycotting methods" to target another (however subtle the methodology or whomever that individual may be), to in effect target me would not have to be employed if the “Society’s” types were indeed originals! on WHERE WERE THE "ORIGINALS" WHEN THE  HOUSE HUNTING TRIP FLIGHTS WERE IN MOTION? 



COMMENT # 1
As the posts GIVING "LIFE" THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED FOR AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY and AN UNMISTAKABLE AND ON-GOING PATTERN THAT HAS RESULTED IN MY DECISION TO RELOCATE have documented, mail intended for specific destinations/functions can arrive completely altered (when “Society’s” types and their Supporters are involved) because of their “thin” standards (and being aware that they are not held accountable for their practices employed in their anything goes motto as long as it works); as others are. This post previously pointed out that when the payments were mailed by me to complete the Montero’s repayments, they were in the form depicted here. Therefore, being fully aware of the above, I am stating for the record that I am in no way responsible for the manner in, which the payments arrived at their destination, especially if others (known for “thin” to zero standards and the desire to be  NUMBER ONE (1) AT ALL COSTS), are taking credit for the same payments. on HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTITY TRANSFER - UPDATED W/INSERTS




ON 12/25/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

Since (by an action of the highest Court in the land) a certain con artist received the “right” to “speak” through a Corporation, which was a former employer of mine and he is turn using my identity as if his own, (in effect transferring my identity, accomplishments, and qualifications to himself - see the series of posts on AN EXAMPLE OF HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTITY TRANSFER - UPDATED W/INSERTS); the independent contractor decision is being withdrawn thereby removing any outstanding action that can be claimed as his own (at my expense). The need for such will be revisited in the future on relocation. on WHAT WAS OVERLOOKED IN THE FREE SPEECH DEBATE 




ON 12/23/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

Could it be that the reason why this con artist and his Supporters aren’t concerned about the SEC is related to that $33 million “sweetheart” settlement deal worked out between that Agency and BofA in 2009, (which absorbed the former Chemical Bank through; which my finances were arranged while in attendance at Pratt - see the post ARBITRARY ACTION, OR IS IT?); to settle claims of “materially lying”, by that Institution? on PRACTICAL INVOLVEMENT CANNOT BE ASSUMED SIMPLY WITH LABELS AND NUMBERS




ON 12/21/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

The lives of individuals aren’t objects to be treated as M&A targets, to bring about “distressed” conditions (via layoff), and then follow-up with “vulture” tactics to force an individual to “give up” his identity, accomplishments and qualifications (via quid pro quo deal-making to bring about the “Exporting” of records to transfer) and to prop those willing to pay “Society’s” types for easy “credibility”, (with perpetual wealth-generation as their main objective). The same “thin” standards individuals using these predatory methods can’t take competition in any form and resort to brandishing their “awesome” reputations to “scare away” potential competitors, routinely. on PRACTICAL INVOLVEMENT CANNOT BE ASSUMED SIMPLY WITH LABELS AND NUMBERS



ON 12/19/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

“Society’s” types have “thin” to zero standards and brandish themselves as doing whatever it takes, however, in the “real” world where actual standards exist all actions have consequences. Since there is a con artist now running around claiming to be James F. Brazant for “credibility”, my question especially since he is claiming to have worked in my identity, is the following, WHEN DID HE RESIGN FROM HIS DIRECTOR POSITION INFORM THE SEC WITHIN “FOUR” (4) DAYS AND TOOK UP HIS NEW POSITION IN MY IDENTITY? Since they are an abundance of photos and SEC filings documenting this con artist in one identity as a “DIRECTOR” in utility circles, (including EPRI), this con artist must comply with SEC requirements in this regard because such an action requires SEC disclosure. Please find out when this disclosure took place, because in the US, not a country known for ITS "WEAK" DISCLOSURE STANDARDS, ACCOUNTABILITY IS NEEDED AND ANY CON ARTIST MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS SUDDEN DROPPING OF ONE NAME AND USE OF ANOTHER OTHERWISE, THE PRECEDENT BEING SET IS THAT THE SEC IS ALLOWING THE “WEAK” DISCLOSURE STANDARDS OF SOME SPECIFIC COUNTRIES TO RULE IN THE USA. THIS IS NOT A REPUTATION THEY WANT TO FOSTER, IN MY OPINION. on PRACTICAL INVOLVEMENT CANNOT BE ASSUMED SIMPLY WITH LABELS AND NUMBERS




ON 12/18/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1

IF ANY LOCATION/LISTING CONTACTED IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS PAGE (IF AT LEAST BEING IN ANYWAY CONSIDERED THEN), IT'S NOT CONNECTED TO CONSERVERY, REGARDLESS OF WHOSE SUPPORT IS BEING PROVIDED, WHETHER "SOCIETY'S" OR SOME OTHER CLUB TYPE! on ADDENDUM TO CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION SELECTION/EXCLUSION - UPDATED




ON 12/15/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1
There is nothing “fresh” about hiding behind a fictional creation to feign connection to my Proprietorship and become involved in every activity carried out by me. There are many different names for this one is called fraud. Resources does NOT endow any individual/entity with the right impersonate, misrepresent and/or outright steal and declare it miraculously original. As previously stated in this Blog’s pages, there is nothing “fresh” about impersonation, it’s simply called old-fashioned cowardly stealing (to use another term), by those with the resources from those who have been stripped of any and weakened to be placed in a state of being unable to stand up for their rights. on ADDENDUM TO AN EXAMPLE OF HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTITY TRANSFER



ON 12/14/2012 FROM J_F_Brazant
COMMENT # 1
George Bissell was originally from New Hampshire. on HOW REAL SUCCESS IS ACHIEVED

















PREVIOUS COMMENTS 1 (FROM 11/24/2012 TO 12/11/2012)

No comments: