For those who are unware, the following is being reprinted from the Conservery Page to ensure that NO misunderstanding exists about the location selection process used to determine the specific places, as depicted on the Conservery Page (AND ALSO SHOWN BELOW):
PLEASE NOTE: STRATEGIC
IMPORTANCE AS DOCUMENTED ABOVE DOES NOT RELATE TO POLITICAL INCLANATION,
CONSISTENT WITH MY PROPRIETORSHIP’S GUIDELINES (see CONSERVERY INDEPENDENT POLITICAL SERVICES FRAMEWORK/GUARANTEE POLICY SUMMARIZED & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS) BUT RATHER OTHER FACTORS
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMATED TO:
- ANY LOCATION EVENTUALLY SELECTED DOES NOT CONVEY EITHER THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF PERSONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPRIETORSHIP (Ex. 8 BDR, 9 BTH RESIDENCE ETC) OR THAT ANY "VIRTUAL" IMPOSTERS ARE ASSOCIATED.
- IF THE PLACE EVALUATED REPRESENTED UNRECONCILED PAST ISSUES/LOCATION CONCERNS, IT WAS EXCLUDED.
- IF THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT WAS EXTENDED AND THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH SPECIFIC LOCATION DISPLAY UNETHICAL CONDUCT THAT RENDERED IT UNWORKABLE; IT WAS EXCLUDED
- IF ANY LOCATION COULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED, IT WAS EXCLUDED (EX. IF MY IDENTITY IS MISREPRESENTED BY ANYTHING IN THE SPECIFIC LOCATION/LISTING, AND
- THE LOCATIONS SELECTED WILL BE FOR THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROPRIETORSHIP'S INTERESTS ONLY, AND IT IS:
 |
| Link Below |
THE LOCATION SHOWN WILL BE THE BASE LOCATION AND IT WAS EVALUATED USING THE PROPRIETORSHIP'S CRITERIA ABOVE, FOR CONSISTENCY AND/OR TRANSPARENCY.
- GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION WITH RESPECT TO BUSINESS INTERESTS ACTIVITY
- RELATIONSHIP INTEREST (OF IMPORTANCE)
- COMMUNICATION FACTORS
- TRANSPORTATION FACTORS WITH REPSECT TO BUSINESS ACTIVITY ETC.
14 comments:
Since they are those who attempt to dictate relocation destinations for My Proprietorship to demonstrate legitimacy (when they have none, apart from hiding behind those who sell themselves to the highest bidder); a running list of unworkable locations previously evaluated will be kept here to avoid any misunderstandings. IT MUST BE NOTED THAT THIS LIST ONLY IMPLIES THAT THE LISTED AREAS HAVE BEEN RULED OUT AS DESTINATIONS FOR MY PROPRIETORSHIP, for one reason or another, as follows: ALABAMA, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, FLORIDA, ILLINOIS, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, MARYLAND, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON STATE AND WISCONSIN.
The running list of unworkable locations previously evaluated and posted on May 7, 2012 is being updated as follows: ALABAMA, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, FLORIDA, ILLINOIS, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, MARYLAND, TEXAS, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON STATE AND WISCONSIN.
THIS PROPRIETORSHIP REMAINS UNINTERESTED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A RELOCATION DESTINATION, AND HAS AUTHORIZED NEITHER INDIVIDUAL NOR ENTITY TO MISREPRESENT ME IN THIS REGARD.
FOR MY PROPRIETORSHIP'S AUTHORIZATIONS, MY BLOG/PAGES WILL REFLECT CONSERVERY’S DE FACTO INTENT CONSISTENT AND PROJECTED, IN THIS REGARD.
I do not inquire about properties in excess of 7/8 total bedrooms; I CANNOT justify it for my Proprietorship, as stated in the evaluation/exclusion criteria in this post!
The selection of this northern Georgia location is unrelated to the existence of a certain Window-Dresser in this State (as documented in Comment #1 from ONGOING COVER-UP OF MISREPRESENTATION/FRAUD & ITS SYMPTOMS)& its seclection is under serious review as to the conflicting, inconsistent message it sends.
Ultimately, this location, Georgia could not be justified with the circumstances surrounding the existence of a high profile Disaster-Prone "Window Dresser", as documented in the above Comment.
I have seen insinuations, hints at indications, manipulations, variations and complications all in the cause of trying to justify this cover-up (see THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION - UPDATED - link on COMMENTS Page), by using a "Window Dresser" as a "legitimate" connection to my Proprietorship. From here on "ONLY ACTION" will suffice!
I could not seriously consider California, for a relocation destination until my AOL account details were clarified as documented in the post ADDENDUM TO PROPERTY UPDATE DETAIL - link on COMMENTS Page), and the activities associated with my involvement in the events in Hawaii were revealed in detail for the Record [see the post REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED - link on COMMENTS Page]. Now serious consideration can be given, without the "Society's" agents twisting & trying to manipulate all my actions to suite their agenda, because of their lack of respect for the rights of anyone outside their "puppet Society".
The selection of the Wareham area of MA for further evaluation is NOT an indication that any "Society" individual with a selected name that sounds like banana (because of its historical significance in Ohio), is in anyway connected to this Proprietorship!
Wiping the history on my PC clean to try to prove that "Society" types were those who communicated with Pinnacle Sotheby's is about as subtle as removing files connected to another location contacted, which led to the posting of ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE - link on COMMENTS Page), and smacks of desperation just as the submission of a "hollow name" with fictitious birth records of my daughters mangled (ex. 2/28/51) (see the post COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - link on COMMENTS Page) to the Insurance Company, instead of the document mailed by me (see photo on COMMENTS Page), which is choking and having a "records producing" fit over finding; does not cast the POSTAL SYSTEM IN A CREDIBLE LIGHT WHEN IT RELATES TO ISSUES OF IDENTITY AND THE "TRUTH" not "new truth". This is not the first occasion on, which a document was submitted via the postal system from Olin & a totally different document reached the intended destination (see photos - on COMMENTS Page of documents submitted to & received from HHS for Social Security Name Forms corrections in 2005)
Requirement 10 of the Conservery Open Position (see below photo of the Position Announcement - on COMMENTS Page) calls for the Selectee to have input in the selection of the relocation destination, therefore, there will be no OFFICIAL announcement of any location until the position has been filled, this would be classic bait & switch, and inconsistency on my part. Let me re-emphasize this point, EXPECT NO SUCH ANNOUNCEMENT until the filling of this position, or at a minimum, a dual announcement of the Selectee and the Relocation destination(s) as appropriate, in this matter.
Just because I have taken the position as documented, it the Open Position, to allow the “Selectee” to have input in this process (see Comment #1 from 7/9/2012 on THIS Page), before making any announcement, this does NOT give any “Society” types, hiding behind old establishments previously used by me (see the series of posts on the subject FREQUENTING PAST ETABLISHMENT AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY - link on COMMENTS Page) and because they are now in possession of illegal checking accounts because mine was closed "arbitrarily" (see the post CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 THROUGH 2005 "ARBITRARILY" - link on COMMENTS Page); the right to make ANY real estate transactions, while pretending to be legitimate representatives of this Proprietorship. Just as I do not have the right to authorize transactions in the name of any auto dealership/manufacturer/investor, etc., by the same measure, No Entity, Individual etc. can give any individual the authority to carry out transactions in the name of my Proprietorship, regardless of size, status, etc. (see the CONSERVERY PROPRIETORSHIP Page for additional details - link on COMMENTS Page), it is simply unethical and blatantly thuggish behavior by those who are intent of maintaining the “lie” started [see the series of posts on the subject UPDATED ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED - link on COMMENTS Page], because their business models have now been built around benefiting financially from maintaining this “lie” (see CAN MY INVESTMENTS REALLY STAND UP TO INTENSE SCRUTINY? - link on COMMENTS Page).
The “Focused Unit Ocean” area between Sunny Isles Beach and Golden Beach, in Miami-Dade County, FL has been specifically excluded from the remainder of the State, which remains unworkable for relocation destination purposes.
Post a Comment