In today’s digital
society when it is not really possible to know who is on the other end of the
communicating medium and where technological advances have made it possible for
a “virtual” society to flourish on both sides of the Atlantic; how can you tell
who is real and who is an impostor (for those who are truly interested in
accuracy)? Follow this alphabetical outline to assist in the determination:
In conclusion, all that can be stated is that individuals who rely on such methods to live by have to be always “looking over their shoulders” to determine whether or not exposure is over the next horizon to be prepared to ‘‘execute” whatever action is required in order to protect their easily gotten ID/accomplishments. IT IS MY HOPE THAT IF ONLY A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IS ENLIGHTENED BY THIS DEPICTION OF METHODOLOGY OF THIS VIRTUAL SOCIETY, THEN MY EFFORT WOULD HAVE BEEN WORTH IT.
· You cannot tell by the advertisements they display, because it is usually all “smoke and mirrors”.
· You cannot tell by
the “bucks” (or resources) they flaunt, because it’s not possible to
tell how they are obtained (see ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE).
· You cannot tell by
the “crests” they display, because they are chameleons and can become
anything desired to gain their objective.
·
Most definitely, the
diplomas they show cannot be relied on because they can be purchased
with the appropriate connections (see ON-GOING COVER-UP OF MISREPRESENTATION/FRAUD AND ITS SYMPTOMS).
· It is not possible
to tell by the extras that support them, because these individuals may
themselves be “virtual” impostors.
· You cannot tell by
the “virtual friends” who vouch for them, because these individuals may
themselves be “virtual” impostors as well.
· You cannot with any
accuracy tell by the grants, which they donate to various causes,
because if their resources are questionably obtained, charitable grants are
meaningless.
·
It isn’t possible to
tell by the history, which they purport to have because to the “virtual" types,
such events are typically borrowed (see MISREPRESENTATION/FRAUD ON/OFF LINE - A SYMPTOM OF "WEB" ADVANCES).
· The investments they
make are not an accurate barometer of their true identity, because if the
sources of their income are “virtual”, it doesn’t matter where their funds are
outwardly deposited for legitimacy.
· Definitely you
cannot rely on the jester who is elevated to support impostors in
communion (see EXPLANATION OF A DISSASTER PRONE WINDOW DRESSING PERSON and THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY'S VIRTUAL SOCIETY).
· The stories of their
supposed knowledge are not reliable or credible because these types
cannot function without armies of “supporters”.
· The lifestyles
they are reported to live by cannot be really validated.
· Their medical
records that exist in their “virtual” identities cannot be relied on for
credibility.
· The networks
they are credited with originating rely on unethical tactics only (see ANOTHER REASON FOR EXCLUDING LOCATIONS FROM CONSIDERATION BY THE PROPRIETORSHIP).
·
Even the offspring
they use to hide behind for credibility, in actuality belong to others (see THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF HAVING A "VIRTUAL" IDENTITY).
·
Candidates whose
only calling card is marked by, deception, deceit and deviousness represent
their politics.
·
You cannot tell by
the astounding questions noted as having been raised by
them, because these types can only operate where pseudo-events (see details below) are involved.
· Furthermore, you
cannot tell by the RSVPs rejected by them in their virtual identities
(in, which they are not publicly known), but only use to give them
credibility).
· Without question,
you cannot tell by the stamped-signatures used with their virtual
identities (IDs).
· In addition, you
cannot tell by their tours-of-duty, because these can also
be fictitious.
· You cannot tell by
the universities to, which they donate (often in large measure) for credibility
purposes only.
· Most definitely,
their visas cannot be relied on since they are using borrowed IDs and fake passports.
· Undoubtedly, the
(divorce) Waivers they are trying to hide behind for credibility aren’t
theirs.
· Even the x-rays
they use are embellished to support their “virtual” IDs because the facts (see SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES) don’t
support their assumed alter egos.
· Their yearbooks
are definitely invalid and cannot be relied on for the obvious reasons, (because
these can be doctored with the right donations) and
· In reality, these
individuals are “Zebras”, as they are one pigmentation externally, but
marked by a completely different color underneath (or internally in their "virtual" identities or "two faces").
In conclusion, all that can be stated is that individuals who rely on such methods to live by have to be always “looking over their shoulders” to determine whether or not exposure is over the next horizon to be prepared to ‘‘execute” whatever action is required in order to protect their easily gotten ID/accomplishments. IT IS MY HOPE THAT IF ONLY A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IS ENLIGHTENED BY THIS DEPICTION OF METHODOLOGY OF THIS VIRTUAL SOCIETY, THEN MY EFFORT WOULD HAVE BEEN WORTH IT.
No comments:
Post a Comment