Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

Friday, July 27, 2012

MERE OBJECTS FOR THE LEGITIMACY OF OTHERS – UPDATED

This follow-up to the previous topic MERE OBJECTS FOR THE LEGITIMACY OF OTHERS focuses on how those of the “Society” is supported and upheld in their fictitious identities, namely by advertising. Such ads are symbolically either representation of the types of establishments used by the individuals whose identity is being stolen (see the series of posts on the subject FREQUENTING THE PAST ESTABLISHMENTS AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY), or other ads carefully place the name of an impostor in the ad for the appearance of legitimacy for such frauds hiding in the identity of another. Advertising has apparently been co-opted by the “Society” as means to their end, which is repetition leads to acceptance and acceptance equates to legitimacy, (see the post WHY DO “VIRTUAL”SOCIETY TYPES RELY ON SOFT TOUCH ADVERTISING?). In examining the subject matter for sometime, I have formed the opinion personally that any industry, business, occupation etc., which relies heavily on or have come to symbolize senseless mass advertising is a “haven” for the “Society” types. What types of businesses, occupations, etc. have evolved into seemingly “graveyards” for absurdity? We are all too familiar with the used car and some manufacturer’s type sales ads, which are some of the most outrageous, with their 1st ever sales event every other week, or the most insulting, we are here to save you money, a lot of money. Also joining the used car dealers etc. and becoming ever more notorious offenders are, insurance and election/re-election political advertising. The following “snapshot” is given in example:
·         Insurance companies have joined the ranks of those that make the most ridiculous claims and they are accepted because market types who study human behavior have told product advertisers, no matter how senseless it is, if its repeated often enough, it will become accepted as “normal”. For example, if any “real” consideration is given to how silly the concept of an annoying mascot running around with a phony accent stating that it is saving people money on car insurance, is, it wouldn’t be given the time of day. However, because the “snake oil” salesperson in this case is remade into an apparently “harmless” mascot, it is accepted as “normal” and the public “swallows” the hoax and the perpetrators are ginning all the way to financial “ecstasy”.
·          Political ads are also notorious for the characterizing of the opponent into a seemingly monstrous individual, no matter how sincere. As a result, politics has become a “swarming” ground for its own form of “snake oil” sales representatives. As long as they can “sell” the public on insincere claims made to appear to be credible, they are accepted as legitimate no matter how phony or “hollow” they are, (see the post PERSISTENCE OF THOSE WITHOUT SOCIAL ETHICS). Ever since television changed the political process during the Nixon-Kennedy debates, it has become more essential to rely on “made for television” candidates, even if they are as “hollow” as a straw. As long as they are made “picture-perfect” for television no matter if they are propped up more pylons than are needed to support most of this Country’s bridges behind the scenes; as long as their “made for television” (public) appearance gives a look of credibility, just as the annoying mascot with the phony accent is, the masquerading that has become politics today goes on its present course and will only get worse.
WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE SOCIETY AT LARGE, WHEN WE HAVE
BECOME SO SUPERFICIAL THAT PHONIES (OR MAYBE PEONIES) CAN
PRETEND TO BE LEADERS WITH “FAMILIES” (IN SOME CASES, AS BEST
TYPIFIED BY THE MOVIE “DAVE”) AND THE REMAKING OF THE “SNAKE OIL
SALES REP INTO A “HARMLESS” MASCOT, CAN’T BE REALIZED BY ANYONE
OUTSIDE THE “SOCIETY” FOR WHAT IT (THEY) TRULY IS (ARE)?
 
 

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

MERE OBJECTS FOR THE LEGITIMACY OF OTHERS

It is a sad commentary on any society when the lives of a father and his three (3) children (see the post GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD-FASHIONED WAY) lives are turned up sided down and into objects of legitimacy for a multitude of impostors and other “society’s” types, all for the cause of covering up the implications of the actions of a “dimwit” [Mr. Alan Wing - see the post UPDATED ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED]. A twenty-two (22) year-long waste of resources (ill-gotten and otherwise), have been employed in:
1) Re-creating a fictional “family branch” and giving it “life”  (see the post GIVING LIFE THE OLD-FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY), by a then medium-sized investment type with visions of grandeur and himself becoming the $$$$$$$$$$$ investment “mogul” of all time, responsible for “splitting off” this “new truth, in creating not sustainable energy, but a continuous wealth-producing “Society”, which would always be indebted and loyal to him, (see the  above UPDATED ADDENDUM REFERENCED post).
2) Ably assisted by three (3) cent politicians (typically con-artists types), who sell out the public trust and speak “with forked tongue” (or from both sides of their mouths) in return for graft, credentials, etc. see the post REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED.
3) Who collectively view those whose lives have been up-ended as “objects for their manipulation”, when even the resources designed to protect the rights of individuals are corrupted for the purpose of giving cover to identity switching and other unethical practices in the support of such activities (see the above GIVING “LIFE” UPDATED post and the included photo below from the post CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS - UPDATED W/INSERTS), to give the

appearance publicly that a then much younger approximately (4) year-old Danielle was connected to a James Brazant (from Iowa), approximately eight (8) months after relocating here, and
4) Continually viewed as pawns and objects who deserve nothing better than to be subjected to staged accidents [see the post TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF REASONS FOR EXCLUDING LOCATION(S) FROM CONSIDERATION], until the perfect type of scenario in created to completely alter an individual's identity (see the post CRISES “INDUCED” IDENTITY TRANSFER), as planned.

In conclusion, what more can be said about the callousness of such a society, not much, except to state that it is because I had examples, in my life whom I CHOSE to use as an example, is why I have not patterned my life’s example after the “Society’s” types for an easy life, while giving up: my identity, principles, objectives, achievements and all that I hold dear, regardless of what inducements are placed before me; THAT IS TOO HIGH A PRICE. 

Sunday, July 22, 2012

REMARKABLE AND RELIABLE

The selection of this topic as the theme for the month of October is not a coincidence, as it was chosen to highlight and mention those qualities referred to by me as significant “R’s” by design. I have personally known only one such individual in my life, my late mother who possessed some unique qualities that I had the privilege of witnessing first hand. My siblings (especially my sister, June) referred to me as my mother’s “pet” or favorite. I am not sure if what my sister saw and concluded was favoritism was what my late mother felt to me or not because my birth brought back similar circumstances as occurred with her first child, the stillbirth, but not quite at birth. Shortly after my birth I contracted a “cold”, from my late mother who had contracted it, and in her words, she thought that was also going to loose me as she did her first. However, unlike the first-born, I survived, and maybe what my siblings saw was my mother’s joy that her last did not turn out as her first did.
What makes an individual remarkable and reliable? First of all, the definitions from the dictionary are: “noticeable in an uncommon or extraordinary” manner and dependable respectively. These two significant “R’s” as I refer to them are formed from an equally unique prefix, like no other. To digress, this prefix, “re” has the potential to introduce an almost “limitless” set of words, because none other even come close.
Of the two (2) significant “R’s”, remarkable is the “heavyweight”, so to speak, because it takes more than a single synonym to describe it. How was my late mother noticeable in an uncommon way? Well, a pretender, she was not, but one who lived her beliefs, namely that those in need of assistance, should be assisted, if in a position to do so. In this way, she was a well-known, women’s rights advocate. For example, when the spouses, partners or significant others of her customers chose for one reason or another not to contribute to their own households, my late mother could be relied on to extend her unique form of credit for groceries to these individuals, who would pay her back when conditions improved. Some did not, but my mother did not quiver about this because those types could not return again. In her own way, these are some of the types of reasons, which help to gain an understanding into why my late mother did not want to expand the family grocery store, because in a larger supermarket arrangement, my mother would loose that connection she had with those who had come to rely on her. Needless to say these practices made her definitely noticeable in a very unique way.
Reliable typified my late mother, who not only waited for an individual who expressed an interest in her, but also allowed him the opportunity to “seek his fortune” or to prove himself and that she did with my late father (see the posts A TRIBUTE TO MY LATE MOTHER and ADDENDUM TO GIVING "LIFE" THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY). In the process, she also demonstrated that she could be a potentially reliable spouse. Even though my late mother’s life turned out different than some others, she showed to those who made very different life decisions, and chose not to wait for the“right” type of individual in their lives and paid for their mistakes repeatedly, that regardless, she could be relied on to provide assistance when needed. On rear occasions, some are given a second chance, but this is the exception to the rule, because once this path is chosen, it is extremely difficult to “escape” a relationship from these “con artists”, who “prey” on such individuals. Only a truly unique and unpretentious individual who has recognized her situation and is willing to seek “higher” ground, will even admit to making an error in judgment, because most do not and remain in their spiral, at the hands of those with little regard and respect for the rights and lives of others. The condition of our society with its tone being set by the“Society” is a testament to why most today are not very good parents, the examples are all around us, (see the series of posts on the subject TRYING TO REPLACE A CAGE DOOR AFTER THE BIRD HAS FLOWN - UPDATED).

Friday, July 20, 2012

ADDENDUM TO CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION/SELECTION EXCLUSION - UPDATED 11/7/2013

The process for selection of the appropriate location is strictly followed to ultimately determine the location selected in this addendum to the post CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION/SELECTION EXCLUSION:

  1. ANY EMAIL INQUIRY MADE WILL NOT BE FOLLOWED-UP WITH PHONE INQUIRY PRIOR TO WRITTEN RESPONSES AT ANY PHASE OF THE REVIEW AND EVALUATION PROCESS. NOTE: THIS CRITERION IS INTENDED TO REINFORCE THE FACT THAT VERBAL COMMUNICATION IS NOT USED TO CIRCUMVENT WRITTEN COMMUNICATION BY THIS PROPRIETORSHIP TO ENSURE TRANSPARENCY.
  2. ONLY A SINGLE EMAIL ADDRESS IS USED FOR CONSISTENCY AND TRANSPARENCY TO AVOID MISREPRESENTATION BY ANY INDIVIDUAL/ENTITY REGARDLESS OF STATUS.
  3. LACK OF WRITTEN RESPONSE WILL BE ASSUMED TO BE UNAVAILABLE AND; WILL BE ADDRESSED IN THIS MANNER. 
  4. ANY LOCATION EVENTUALLY SELECTED DOES NOT CONVEY EITHER THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF PERSONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPRIETORSHIP (Ex. 8 BDR, 9 BTH RESIDENCE ETC) OR THAT ANY "VIRTUAL" IMPOSTORS ARE ASSOCIATED.
  5. IF THE PLACE EVALUATED REPRESENTED UNRECONCILED PAST ISSUES/LOCATION CONCERNS, IT WAS EXCLUDED.
  6. IF THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT WAS EXTENDED AND THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH SPECIFIC LOCATION DISPLAY UNETHICAL CONDUCT THAT RENDERED IT UNWORKABLE; IT WAS EXCLUDED
  7. IF ANY LOCATION COULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED, IT WAS EXCLUDED (EX. IF MY IDENTITY IS MISREPRESENTED BY ANYTHING IN THE SPECIFIC LOCATION/LISTING, AND
  8. THE LOCATION(S) SELECTED WILL BE FOR THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROPRIETORSHIP'S INTERESTS ONLY.
  9. The purpose of this update is to point out that THE SPECIFIC FOCUSED LOCATION CONTACTED AND IDENTIFIED BY ME ON THESE PAGES ALONE IS THE FINAL RELOCATION DESTINATION SELECTED BY THE REVIEW AND EVALUATION PROCESS CARRIED OUT BY THIS PROPRIETORSHIP. Any other unauthorized contacts carried out and/or commitments made in support of a different location (whether previously contacted by me or otherwise) and “validated” by individual(s) conferring upon themselves de facto authority to act in a manner contrary to the OPERATING GUIDELINES; using methods such as “spoofing” electronic “induced”wire fraud etc. will not be upheld and/or legitimized by Conservery (see the posts ANOTHER REASON FOR EXCLUDING LOCATIONS FROM CONSIDERATION as well as ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE). In this regard, let me take the time to apologize to any Party (Parties) who may have been so deceived by the actions of “Society’s” types, whose motto is “the end justifies the means”, (see the post TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN).
  10. FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES, THE FOLLOWING LISTING OUTLINES AREAS RULED OUT AS A NATIONAL/ INTERNATIONAL BASE LOCATION IDENTIFIED FOR THE (PROPRIETORSHIP'S THE WAY FORWARD METHODOLOGY) FOR VARIOUS IRRECONCILABLE, INCOMPATIBILITY, AND/OR INCONSISTENCY WITH THE REVIEW & EVALUATION CRITERIA, TYPE ISSUES AS NOTED ON THIS BLOG PAGES: ALABAMA, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OHIO, OREGON, TEXAS, WASHINGTON STATE AND WISCONSIN. 
  11. For additional criteria not listed on this post, see the listing of the comparable posting on the Conservery Blog, link CONSERVERY' RELOCATION  REVIEW/SELECTION PROCESS GUIDELINES.
  12. When follow-up is made with any selected location documented in this post, it will be documented here, since there are those that make a practice of using technology to mimic and other unethical practices in an effort to demonstrate legitimacy where NONE EXISTS, since they are protected by Arbiters, Titans and other “Society’s” type Moguls (as documented in the Conservery Challenge Video - on the CONSERVERY CHALLENGE Page). IF THERE IS NO DOCUMENTED NOTATION MADE HERE ABOUT ANY SELECTED LOCATION BEING CONSIDERED; THEN IT IS UNAUTHORIZED AND NOT AUTHENTIC WITH REGARDS THIS PROPRIETORSHIP'S INTERESTS, BECAUSE CONTACTS MADE BY THOSE OF THE "FREE LOADER'S CAUSE" TYPES HIDING IN VARIOUS IDENTITIES REGARDLESS OF HOW FAR OR N-E-A-R, WHO CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR THEIR ORIGINS) DON'T COUNT TOWARDS "CREDIBILITY", WITH REGARDS THIS PROPRIETORSHIP, IRREGARDLESS OF WHOSE SUPPORT SUCH AN INDIVIUAL(S) MAY HAVE. THE FOLLOWING LOCATION(S) HAS(HAVE) BEEN SELECTED FOR ITS(THEIR) LOGISTICAL VALUE, BECAUSE IF IT DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THIE PAGES OF THIS BLOG, ITS NOT VALID
  13. IT NUST BE NOTED THAT THIS PROPRIETORSHIP IS IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH ANY EFFORT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN ORLANDO, IN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. I HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO INFORM THE KNOWN INDIVIDUAL OF THIS AND TO BE ADVISED ACCORDINGLY THAT SUCH EFFORTS ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH CONSERVERY. THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO ENSURE THAT MY PROPRIETORSHIP IS NOT DEFRAUDED BY THOSE OF THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" AND THEIR SUPPORTERS. A SIMILAR CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THE EFFORTS ON-GOING IN NEW ORLEANS LOUISIANA, WHICH AS OF 10/3/2013, THIS PROPRIETORSHIP IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH IN ANYWAY. IN ADDITION, ANY PROPERTY PURCHASE(S) THAT IS (ARE) BEING OR MAY BE CARRIED OUT IN THE IRVING, AREA OF THE STATE OF TEXAS IS NEITHER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPRIETORSHIP NOR CAN ANY ARRANGEMENTS TAKING PLACE, PLACE ANY FINANCIAL, LEGAL OR ANY TYPE OF BURDEN ON THIS PROPRIETORSHIP, AND/OR ITS LEGITIMATE RESOURCES, PERIOD.   THE LOCATION CHOSEN  IS IDENTIFIED BELOW:

 
                            
TBA




  
 
THE COMPLETED FINAL ANNOUNCEMENT IS DEPICTED BELOW:





TBA




















James F. Brazant
Founder/Owner
Conservery
November 7, 2013
 


THE SPECIFIC AREA/LOCATION SHOWN WILL BE THE BASE AND IT WAS EVALUATED USING THE PROPRIETORSHIP'S CRITERIA ABOVE, FOR CONSISTENCY AND/OR TRANSPARENCY.

 
PLEASE NOTE: STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE AS DOCUMENTED ABOVE DOES NOT RELATE TO POLITICAL INCLINATION, CONSISTENT WITH MY PROPRIETORSHIP’S GUIDELINES (see CONSERVERY INDEPENDENT POLITICAL SERVICES FRAMEWORK/GUARANTEE POLICY SUMMARIZED & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS) BUT RATHER OTHER FACTORS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
  • GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION WITH RESPECT TO BUSINESS INTERESTS ACTIVITY
  • RELATIONSHIP INTEREST (OF IMPORTANCE)
  • COMMUNICATION FACTORS
  • TRANSPORTATION FACTORS WITH RESPECT TO BUSINESS ACTIVITY ETC. 


 

Thursday, July 19, 2012

ADDENDUM TO GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED (9/1/2012) TO INCLUDE AND EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY as well as 9/19/2015

This continuance of the subject GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AND EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY is being carried out to describe how “State” sponsored identity theft is enacted as follows: first you need an individual with a hollowname, and my former spouse certainly fits this characterization, (see below communication with my then divorce attorney on this topic, included in my divorce submittal as a Supplement with the "explanation" she uses to justify her different names), next once the target has


Explanation of "Hollow" Name in Supplement From Divorce Hearing of 4/2/2012 
taken up residence in the desired location, saddling the individual with the hollow name is automatically done by carefully selected institutions and others (below see one such that went out of its way to communicate with us a month after arrival in Iowa, at the Cedar Rapids department), where her daughter has now completed her studies, with a “unique "scholarship [from

Correspondence Received From Kirkwood Exactly One Month After Relocating to the Sate of Iowa in 1991 

Principal Financial (- see comment from 6/16/2012 on the SPECIAL PROJECTS Page as a comment) - typically given for those who are the first members of their family to attend College]; where Presidents, Presidential candidates, etc. make their way just because of this “uniqueness”, (even in very recent times), because if this institution is communicating with James Brazant with the “hollow” name affixed to him (with the concurrence in my vindictive ex spouse who doesn't tell the truth about her past with her multiple birth records as documented in comment #1 from 5/29/2015 on the Cosvry Investments COMMENTS 2015 Page), there is no way that the other skilled individual who was hired at IELP for his background and this individual can be the same, because this is not a label that I assign to myself.
I make a habit of using my middle initial since this was my familiar or family name as documented in the Here are the Background Issues section  of the post THE DECISION TO ALTER MY RETURN TO MY TO "HOMELAND" AT THIS TIME - UPDATED AND AMENDED, but this is a pattern started by some with questionable intentions with long-range planning capabilities (as this is the same "nameform" when my the approval of my request for Leave of Absence from my the Government of Barbados to travel to the US for study purposes was also used even though this was not how I was typically addressed there as well), which my now former employer was in my opinion was only too "happy" to significantly exploit as it started even when I was only interviewing for the position that I was eventually hired for, when at least three (3) different "nameforms" were used (photos shown at the bottom of this Post), which I have now concluded was an attempt to give the appearance that multiple individuals using variations of my name were hired at this entity and then proceeded to backdate documents once hired as documented in the post HOW TO IMPLEMENT IDENTITY THEFT AND LEGITIMIZE FRAUD -  UPDATED AND AMENDED, to carry out this new "reality".
I have never given that name form to anyone however, I CANNOT vouch for
my now ex spouse with her questionable identity issues (impostor described in comment #1 from 5/29/2015 on the Cosvry Investments COMMENTS 2015 Page, with the different birth years and in search of an identity).  
The true intent of this saddling of the individual is done surreptitiously to the individual but is made known everywhere in order that when the larger plan is enacted it will be clear that they were always correct. This “saddling” must be maintained therefore, when my insurance Provider was changed, those whose “new” identities are based on this “hollow” name being kept in place, followed to ensure that this "hollow" name is used at the new Provider, who is insinuating to me that I cannot obtain insurance without being saddled with this “hollow” name, this sound like a “subtle threat”. Maybe they are aware of information that I am not privy to, because the “State” and those who are “banking” this “new truth” are of such scale that they are telling me that “this is the way it is and I cannot do anything about it”, in this the pinnacle of freedom loving “Societies” everywhere.
Maintaining the status quo is the primary end produce of those who have made a mockery of the institutions of this “respected” Country and are “forcing” me to accept the “new truth” that I have shown to be a farce. When all else fails those whose self interest are based on maintaining their “pyramid” wealth schemes, resort to these. In reality the truth is as follows:
My mother’s reputation is at stake, from those who have tarnished it by insinuating that she had children prior to age 34, (see the series of posts on the subject ADDENDUM TO SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING A "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES). My late mother was a LADY in the true sense of the word who waited for my late father’s return from “seeking his fortune” to marry her, settle down and having her first child at age THIRTY FOUR (34) as stated above (see the post A TRIBUTE TO MY LATE MOTHER). Those are the facts, it is neither my late mother’s concern nor mine who cannot justify their legal entry into this Country and are being propped up by those who benefit financially and those who sell out the public trust with a “grin” and become wealthy through phony book sales. This is about my late mother’s reputation. To suggest that she was the type of individual many are accepting as the “norm” today is “fictional”, because that was NOT Mrs. Ina Elise Sobers (Brazant’s), NORMAL, for those who are unfamiliar with her (SHE HAD NO CHILDREN WHO WOULD BE OLDER THAN APPROXIMATELY 64/65 IF HER OLDEST WAS ALIVE TODAY).
The above is consistency as is the below depiction of my first Performance Evaluation from the Kerite Company, the very nuclear background for, which I was hired at the DAEC. As previously stated in the post “HOW IS THE MEMORABILIA OF YOUR QUALIFICATIONS DETERMINED? ” those who are truly qualified will always find a way to shine regardless of the obstacles placed before them by those whose only “truth” is thuggish behavior and for whom the end justifies the means (see the post CAN MY INVESTMENTS REALLY STAND UP TO INTENSE SCRUTINY?).  

A Copy of My First Performance From The Kerite Company - Dated December 1985
  
A Copy of My First Performance From Kerite - Dated December 1985






EXAMPLES OF MULTIPLE "NAMEFORMS" USED BY MY FORMER EMPLOYER DURING INTERVIEW PROCESS




















































Wednesday, July 18, 2012

DIRECTION CHANGING CHOICES - UPDATED 6/12/2013

This theme for the month of September was not a coincidence, this was and is a tribute to my late mother whose birth month was September (see the post of the same title A Tribute To My Late Mother), and as it turns out is very timely and is intended to be supportive of a “Remarkable and Unique” individual facing a challenge of sorts, and the “choice made” could have a profound impact on many (herself included), if the mantle of the Founding Father Franklin mold is selected, as documented in the post THE CONDITIONAL PRICE OF VOLUNTEERING - UPDATED! . It is my hope that she chooses wisely.


 

Monday, July 16, 2012

GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED FOR AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY (W/INSERTS 5/7/2013)

This update to the previous post, GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY is in reality a retraction and to demonstrate in the measure another example of consistency. Since in the comment # 1 from 11/22/2012 on the COMMENTS Page, confirms that the mailing of this Next Day Mail Social Security Administration's  office was initiated on my behalf via the receipt shown and should have arrived as it was mailed and NOT with any association to fictional Mr & Mrs. James B. Brazant. This mail sent to the Social Security Service Administration (SSA) in one name form and was returned here to 8263 140th Ave, in a completely different “Society’s” fictitious format as documented repeatedly in this Blog, in effect giving “life” to this fictional branch of those who are professing to be legitimate bearers of my name, accomplishments, etc. in a brazen act of “State supported identity theft” . This conclusion has been determined since the application of social security records is an indication of legitimacy, the conference of such to a name initiated due to an "error" on business cards (see the post CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS), is a definite indication of “State” supported identity theft. The purpose of this follow-up is to document for the record that, the mailing of the original letter shown in the initial post on this subject and on the COMMENTS page as indicated previously was actually mailed at THE ANAMOSA POST OFFICE VIA EXPRESS MAIL with tracking No. ED 290879237 US and not the Olin Post Office as earlier indicated (see below photo) and the consistency between the Express Mail Receipt and the Letter of 1/26/2005 can be clearly seen. 
Express Mail Tracking Receipt for Mailing of the Social Security Administration Letter of 1/26/05 for Name Form Corrections - see below


Letter to SSA Transmitted Via the Express Mail Receipt Shown Above on 1/26/2005



 Response Received From SSA on 2/17/2005 in the "Society's" Fictitious Identity
Furthermore, the Clerk’s signature here is an indication of the accuracy of the mailing information on the receipt as well as on the letter included here for emphasis. If the path of this letter can be “tracked”via the unique "Tracking Number" (included above) using all available methods, it can be determined where the letter mailed as shown, “magically” became communication from Mr. & Mrs. James B. Brazant to continue and give “life” to this hoax termed “new truth”, in this Blog [see the series of posts on the subject UPDATED ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED].    



Sunday, July 15, 2012

ADDENDUM TO HOW “VIRTUAL” IDENTITIES ARE SUSTAINED

This is another piece of this puzzle to supplement the previously known tidbits as discussed in HOW VIRTUAL IDENTITIES ARE SUSTAINED, in order that a clearer picture of the methodology of these “Society” types can be obtained. I have now come to realize that the “Society” types “all” need the legitimacy of some central individual to hide behind and no matter what you do, they cannot be jettisoned. For example, if your daughter has an {"untimely”} “accident”, these types find a way to latch themselves unto her billing (see below photo), even on your Drivers
 
 
The ndicated phtoo was removed becaue of my committment to refrain from including anything n this Blog's pages that supports others in the mangling of my identity.
 
BRA DAN 12 64
                                      (OR 3 3 12 64)
1ST 3 LETTERS OF LAST NAME 1ST3 LETTERS OF FIRST NAME YEARARBITRARILY” SELECTED “VIRTUAL”NUMBER
Note the carefully selected identification number on the Billing for my daughter at her in-patient facility from, which she was just released and other information, that “virtuals” and their tax dodging supporters rely on for legitimacy (and illegal tax filing purposes).
License, the specially selected number gives legitimacy for two “Society” types, one from Illinois and the other Iowa to hide behind your legitimacy in order to connect themselves to your history from Connecticut, since it is comprised of the specific address from Still Hill Road, Hamden, the birthplace of my older daughter (see photos of Still Hill Road, Hamden, CT, a copy of  Danielle original Birth Certificate and my IA Driver License below -
508 Still Hill Road, Hamden, CT, Danielle's Birthplace
                                                                                                                               





  






and the posts THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY’S “VIRTUAL” SOCIETY and “VIRTUALS”AND THEIR SELECTION OF LABELS AND NUMBERS). If you obtain vehicle insurance, they find some manner to latch onto it, and when you exercise your right and leave the insurance Provider for another, tired and worn out ways are found to show up like uninvited guests at a wedding “complicating” the guests’ list (with their Supporters making back door deals to ensure they are accommodated). Furthermore, even when you leave the other Provider, they follow you in the form of a refund check with a “complicated” formula for determining it, looking for the mailbox of some “fraud” to “fall” into or better yet, the “fictitious” account of some “Society” type to disappear into (see the post NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK).

These types cannot be shaken, following you around in the case of an “ex”, “stalking” you emotionally, in a manner of speaking, trying to harass you into taking him (or her) back, so that they can be your “NUMBER 1”, while professing their undying “love” while reminding you of all they have done and everything else in your life regardless, and reminding you that they can’t be shaken. Since when does “love” behave in such a controlling manner? (See the post “WHAT REALLY IS LOVE? ). These are the ways of the “Society” types latching onto their source of legitimacy, for dear life, and even if you are unaware of it, there is some quality you possess from, which their legitimacy is obtained and this is the “real” reason why you cannot get rid of these “Society” types. Their business in leaching onto others and it’s second nature to them, and they have all types of ways to reinvent themselves to find a way to place themselves back into your life, because their legitimacy is based on it.

Saturday, July 14, 2012

THE SELF-CENTEREDNESS OF TODAY’S “ME-ISM” - A BY-PRODUCT OF THE “SOCIETY”

“Me-ism” mentality is in short, unfortunately how individuals today operate,
Such individuals can’t show appreciation, which excludes “me” as a dictate, 
This fact is reflected in the separation and divorce rate, which shows, we can’t accommodate,
Unfortunately, those of my gender are usually those who don’t facilitate.
Though this is not true in every case of those who manipulate,
Sadly, those of the other gender have come to accept this role for themselves, alas,
And go out of their way to be callous perpetrators to achieve “class”,
Without realizing how much they “cheapen”, all of their “caste”,
When “adorned” outwardly, but in reality reduced to being simply one of Madam’s “stash”,
Or those who “feel” pressured into thinking that to achieve success, personal dignity has to cave,
In order to survive in a “Society” that rewards thugs and those who “worship” such and call it brave,
Oh, for the day when a better example can be fostered and uplifted,
To rise above and show others they don’t have to settle for “Society’s” vacillators, who have become dated.




References for this figurative depiction of self-centeredness were based on the following posts:

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

ADDENDUM TO AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY

This post is an addendum to the post AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY to emphasize that what is documented in the comment from 7/10/2012 on CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION/SELECTION EXCLUSION about giving the eventual "Selectee" for the position of Operations Director input in the relocation destination selection process and also listed on the COMMENTS Page, is being practiced by me in the situation where any inquiry is made in this regard and it is warranted. See the below excerpt of one email inquiry.


James F Brazant
5:36 PM (16 hours ago)

to JUDY

Admittedly all details gathered by me are exploratory in nature since the individual selected for the position of Operations Director will have input in this process as well. Thanks for your assistance in this matter.

James F. Brazant
Founder
Conservery

Monday, July 9, 2012

GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY

Targeting the cities and/or Town(s) and their most famous citizens, where my older children were born (see photos below) in one manner or another for
Dejon on the Date of his Birth at Yale New Haven, Connecticut Hospital @ 2:07pm on 10/15/1983 Being Held By Me
A Copy of Danielle's Original Birth Certificate
the purpose of achieving phony ancestry records to cover-up the “life”, which was given to a fictitious branch of "family" genealogy (see excerpt from comment from the post CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION SELECTION/EXCLUSION

EXCERPT from COMMENT # 1 From 7/7/2012
... 
This is not the first occasion on, which a document was submitted via the postal system from Olin and a totally different document reached the intended destination (see photos below of documents submitted to and received from HHS for Social Security Name Forms corrections in 2005). on CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION SELECTION/EXCLUSION

This Letter was Posted in January of 2005 to HHS
This was the Response Received From the HHS on 2/17/2005

on the COMMENTS Page included below and the “virtual” Social Security records that were created to justify the hoax discussed in UPDATED ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED and included above, is not the path to legitimate connection to the State where my two oldest children were born for the Society’s impostors who are mimicking the accomplishments of my children, Dejon (see the post MISLABELING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS) and Danielle (see the sub topic Guardianship on the SPECIAL PURPOSE Page from 3/24/2012). 

Thursday, July 5, 2012

UPDATED ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED

This update to the ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED is needed to address the “new truth” versus the “TRUTH” from those incapable of distinguishing facts that older than twenty plus years, as follows for one reason or another. This is a process, which has at its core, covering-up the events in Vermont from 1990 and many have jumped on the bandwagon, to fill-in gaps in their own lives and by so-doing cleverly created a scenario whereby making it easier for the perpetrators of this “new truth” to pull off their hoax, by creating an us against them (outsider) approach to ensure that their hoax will gain acceptance for all (Americans and others) to side with them. The question posed to those who choose to accept the “new truth” for convenience, financial gain or some other reason, what would you do if your identity was rearranged just because you chose to go to a bank seeking to discuss the financing of a project - “The Reopening of The Wildwood Valley Lodge”, which is where you should go to discuss financing and you are treated with disdain by an official (Senior Vice President, Mr. Alan Wing) who ignored you after setting up the appointment and was overheard telling the receptionist that he was awaiting someone to discuss the Reopening of The Wildwood Valley Project”. However, when I stepped forth to introduce myself as the individual he was awaiting, he ignored me and refused to sit down with me or even acknowledge that I should even be there? Those involved have proceeded to create a “new truth” and even try to prove that I never even attended the School, I spent hard-earned funds to attend, but instead, create individuals out of the “blue” to assign my accomplishments to, in order to justify their “new truth”, which is either that I was never in Vermont or if there, should never have been in the Bank because I was not in a position to even be there. Many are gaining from this “new windfall truth”, with their own deficiencies and the need for identities to spend their ill-gotten gains legally, including one who a certain State owes a favor to for carrying out hearing experiments on as an young individual, (can’t really hear and incapable of attending any school but is benefiting from this State’s desire to cover-up what they did to this individual, but are doing so at my expense. This individual who has come to believe that he can get away with anything because he is owed it by this particular State, thinks he can because he knows the underlying reality here is that a “new truth” has been created, which he is benefiting from and he is smiling all the way to financial freedom, in his new found identity and I am suppose to accept him as legitimate). My mother (see A TRIBUTE TO MY MOTHER), did not raise me to be that type of individual regardless of the type of individuals my siblings turned out to be, as we all have to stand individually (see ADDENDUM TO SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING A "VIRTUAL" IDENTITY).
Many have and are benefiting financially from this new status quo and whose self interests “lie” in maintaining the “new truth” and are therefore NOT to be counted on as guarantors of “TRUTH” of any kind, especially the types who oversaw the splitting off of the Citibank old Investments Division (the financial institution of my school Pratt Institute), in the 1990’s, which made their money “the old fashioned way”, from the Banking Division. Once it is realized what their self-interest is, their “word” should not be relied on to validate anything in this matter, because there is no “TRUTH” there! Finally, when the enrollment of my then turning seven-year old, Dejon, has to be denied because of an error (see NON-EXISTENT SOCIAL ETHICS IN A SOCIETY RUN BY “VIRTUALS” UPDATED/REVISED) and a so-called new family branch magically created [(us against them discussed above) - see CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS,   ANOTHER UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF HAVING A “VIRTUAL” IDENTITY,   AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF HAVING A “VIRTUAL” IDENTITY and THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF HAVING A “VIRTUAL” IDENTITY], due again to a “misprint” on business cards and given “life” here in Iowa, then the "deep-seatedness" of the cover-up will be realized and who benefits from the “new truth” from business to political types can’t be relied on for anything remotely close to the “REAL TRUTH”.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

ADDENDUM TO SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES - UPDATED

This was intended to be a Comment to the post SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING "VIRTUAL IDENTITIES"- UPDATED, but it was added as an update instead.
The significance of my brother Paul and sister June switching birth records is no small matter [if such occurred for him to be the older of the two and by so doing give identity frauds cover to ease their way into the birth records of my mother and father, who had two (2) girls (one a still birth) before their first son was born, Paul in 1950, and in any event they had no children before 1947 - see ANOTHER UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF HAVING A “VIRTUAL” IDENTITY]; because records of all type would have to be covered up in many places. For example since she June worked for Barclay's Bank Barbados for approximately twenty (20) years after returning to Barbados from attending business School in New York in 1968 until the time of her early retirement ultimately due to her vehicle accident that occurred in the mid 80s, (see photo below). These records would have to

Norville was my Sister June's Marriage Title, she was Married in Circa 1976 -This is one of the Money Transfers to me While Attending Pratt. - There is NO OTHER Female Included only My Sister and the transfer of Funds Definitely Did NOT Include Any Other Male Apart From me, Whether or not she Changed Her Birth Records With My Brother to Support ID Fraud.
be somehow made to go away. Could it be that the $10 billion investment in Barclay's Bank from the Sovereign funds of an Asian country shortly before the financial meltdown would have played any part in such a “whitewash”?

HOW IS THE MEMORABILIA OF YOUR QUALIFICATIONS DETERMINED - UPDATED?

This monthly theme for August is being UPDATED TO ADD APPLICABLE LINKS and introduced early since many things can be imitated, duplicated, "spoofed" or manipulated and a different approach than first envisioned was determined to be required for this subject, which will be approached from the point-of-view of a closer examination of the word QUALIFICATIONS itself, in an attempt to reveal its essential qualities, as follows:
  • (Q)UESTION - all things instead of simply accepting without thoughtful inquiry,

  • (U)NIQUE - possessor of skills where hiding behind others is not practiced,

  • (A)CTION - seeks answers by prodding until satisfaction is obtained,

  • (I)DEAL - will always be the objective, when skills are put into practice,

  • (F)ACTS - will be the objective when faced with any task,

  • (I)LLUMINATION - will be the desired path to fill in the "dark or blank" spaces,

  • (C)ANDIDNESS - will definitely be on display when skills are possessed because the need to take from others to build up what is lacking in such individuals is not the main objective. Those without "real" skills are in complete contrast regarding this main trait,

  • (A)BLE - to achieve and/or find an avenue to excel in spite of obstacles/challenges, which is in contrast to those who are not in possession of the skills claimed by them,

  • (T)ACTFULLNESS - will be a characteristic of the skilled, even though this may be a trait lost in our "self-centered Society", where gain at the expense of others is rewarded, as such types are seen as doing anything to ensure the bottom line. These types of individuals are in turn propped up by their "Society" as they are taught to display disrespect for the RIGHTS (see Comment # 1 From 7/2/2012 on the COMMENTS Page), PROPERTY (see Comment # 3 From 6/28/2012 on the COMMENTS Page) and PERSONAL AFFAIRS of others (see NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK); while the skilled are forced to "play" sub roles [see ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED,

  • (I)NFORMATION STEWARDSHIP - is a trait possessed by the skilled, this does not include ordering subscriptions and memberships for groups (in fictitious identities) for appearance ONLY purposes and as a "mark" of social status and to justify the illegal finances accumulated that cannot be otherwise justified,

  • (O)BSERVANT- of practices utilized in the field of skill and reflected accordingly,

  • (N)ECESSARY- investigation will be the course followed by the skilled as opposed to the bottom line primary focus of the unskilled. However, the skilled will fine a path to balance these two competing objectives,

  • (S)PECIAL - qualities will always distinguish the skilled because their uniqueness isn't purchased, but rather an inherent characteristic possessed regardless of the circumstances, whether exalted or humble in, which they find themselves. The unskilled cannot exist apart from flashing financial capability as a "mark" of their legitimacy.

This evaluation has shown that qualifications can be compared to a badge carried with "magnificence" such that when faced with various situations, such as where impromptu questions are required, pre-screening does not have to be an absolute must due to lack of skills and/or in the unlikely event that a teleprompter failure occurs, total chaos doesn’t result. On the other hand,“mouthers” aren’t being endorsed because such individuals can talk their way out of any situation without really saying anything. Only when these qualities are perfectly on display regardless of the overriding situation, can the inherent representative skills be said to be an accurate depiction of the skill set being postulated and those to whom the badge belongs will “shine” regardless of the circumstances in, which they find themselves.