NUMBER one (1) AT ALL COSTS

There is something fundamentally wrong when elements of our society adopt the mantra, even subtly that they are always no. 1 in all things. Such types have or need to have it reminded of their association with all that they are number 1 in society even in the most minute of mediums, how else will be society at large be reminded that “Society’s” types are always "numero uno" keeping it always relevant because of their penchant for "brandishing" labels and/or numbers (see the post THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY'S “VIRTUAL” SOCIETY). If they are involved in: a) agriculture they want it to be known that they are the no. 1 producer of a certain crop, b) entertainment, they have to find a way to become associated with or be involved in the no. 1 comedy, drama or network, c) anything medical-related, they have to adopt and brand themselves such labels as “world class” cutting edge technology service providers, d) product manufacturers, they have to go to such lengths as “bribing” participants in “blind” taste tests and/or feigning “real” owners to ensure that the desired outcome is obtained to secure coveted product placement contracts etc., and e) sports, players/participants in no. 1 professional and/or college teams in various sports will invariably be connected to or have “roots” connecting them to “Society’s” type heritages.

For such schemes to be successfully implemented, anyone and/or anything that remotely stands in the way of such unreasonable and dictatorial type manipulation of things factual will have to be “redirected” publicly even if it occurs in the form of a “very public meltdown” (or privately) as the case may be, for replacement to take place. History is full of example of those who have attempted this methodology and in the not very distant past. If I may be so “bold” as to serve as a reminder that such techniques require the usurping of all of society’s agencies and redirecting them into the cause at hand, (see the post HOW IS ARBITRARY ACTION, OR IS IT, CONNECTED TO STRATEGIC LABELS AND NUMBERS - UPDATED?), whether it involves: 1) covering-up historical records, 2) re-creating “new” realities or “facts” (see the post GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY – UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY), 3) manipulating political contests to ensure the desired outcome prevails (see the post ADDENDUM TO COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS CONTINUED AND UPDATED), 4) staging accidents (see the post TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF REASONS FOR EXCLUDING LOCATION(S) FROM CONSIDERATION) and 5) medical system involvement as appropriate, such as to ensure that the “new truth” gains acceptability (see the post HOW ARE ACCIDENTS AND LEGITIMACY CONNECTED TO COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS?) etc.

Such techniques ultimately are only successful in an environment where those “Society’s” types would have the brandishing of “wealth” be taken alone as a “mark” of legitimacy, while going to all means necessary to ensure that any individual who doesn’t develop amnesia and conveniently go with the “new truth” is subjected to intimidated and/or harassment (see the post THE TIME HAS COME) into accepting that their accomplishments (see the post GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE), were carried out by “Society’s” types; or otherwise be faced with labeling and subtle “imprisonment”. Not withstanding the documented FACTS that clearly show that for any “Society’s” type to have pulled off the feats in their borrowed and privately used identities (alter egos) would required omnipotence to pull off (a fact glossed over by those who have been “seduced” into accepting that “wealth” brandishing is the only predictor of “truth” and “preserver” of historical “facts”). This tendency (on the part of society at large), to accept anything as fact, if repeated often enough, is not lost on those who successfully use advertising to further their wealth generating schemes at all costs including their flirtations with being number one regardless of the means to that end (see the posts CAN MY INVESTMENTS REALLY STAND UP TO SCRUTINY? and ADVERTISING’S TRUE PURPOSE - UPDATED). 

AN A-TO-Z EXPOSÉ OF THE VIRTUAL SOCIETY’S METHODOLOGY - UPDATED

This previous post AN A-TO-Z EXPOSÉ OF THE VIRTUAL SOCIETY’S METHODOLOGY was updated to include specific examples and other more relevant data to clarify the subject matter by providing concrete factual data not obtained either at the expense of anyone or with the resources/influence of any individual/entity motivated by perpetual wealth generating schemes, but entirely based on actual historical events for the record. Note that the previous links were not included in this updated version.

In today’s digital society when it is not really possible to know who is on the other end of the communicating medium and where technological advances have made it possible for a “virtual” society to flourish on both sides of the Atlantic; how can you tell who is real and who is an impostor (for those who are truly interested in accuracy)? Follow this alphabetical outline to assist in the determination;

·        You cannot tell because of the advertisements they display, because it could all be “smoke and mirrors”.

·        You cannot tell by the “bucks” (or resources) they flaunt, because it’s not possible to tell how they are obtained.

·        You cannot tell by the “crests” they display, because they are chameleons and can become anything desired to gain their objective.

·        Most definitely, the diplomas they show cannot be relied on because they can be purchased with the appropriate connections.

·         It is not possible to tell by the extras that support them, because these individuals may themselves be “virtual” impostors.

·        You cannot tell by the “virtual friends” who vouch for them, because these individuals may themselves also be “virtual” impostors.

·        You cannot with any accuracy tell by the grants, which they donate to various causes, because if their resources are questionably obtained, charitable grants are meaningless.

·          It isn’t possible to tell by the history, which they purport to have because to the “virtual’ types, such events are typically borrowed (see the below historical linking photos) and the posts CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS,

 

The Listing Agent who Facilitated the Purchase of the Brandford Condo Where I Resided When My Patent Application was Filed in 1984.

My Residence When the Patent was Completed - 1988 



 

 

This is not the same Company as the Company Chosen

to Represent in a Marketing Arrangement as in Indicated

in the post Correct Identification By Connecting the Dots

link above

 

     NON EXISTENT SOCIAL ETHICS IN A SOCIETY RUN BY “VIRTUALS” - UPDATED/REVISED and GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE.

·        The investments they make are not an accurate barometer of their true identity, because if the sources of their income are “virtual”, it doesn’t matter where their funds are outwardly deposited for legitimacy.

·         Definitely you cannot rely on the jester who is elevated to support impostors in communion.

·         The stories of their supposed knowledge is not reliable or credible because these types cannot function without armies of “supporters”.

·         The lifestyles they are reported to live by cannot be really validated.

·         Their medical records that exist in their alter ego or “virtual” identities cannot be relied on for credibility.

·         The networks they are credited with originating rely on unethical tactics only.

·         Even the offspring they use to hide behind for credibility, in actuality belong to others.

·         Candidates and others whose only calling card is depicted by, deception, deceit and deviousness represent their politics.

·        You cannot tell by either the astounding questions noted as having been raised by them as a result of pseudo-events.

·         Furthermore, you cannot tell by the RSVPs rejected by them in their virtual identities (in, which they are not publicly known but only privately, and relied on only to give them credibility).

·         Without question, you cannot tell by the stamped-signatures used with their virtual identities (IDs).

·         In addition, you cannot tell by their tours-of-duty, because these can also be fictitious.

·         You cannot tell by the universities to, which they donate (often in large measure) for credibility purposes only, these credentials can be borrowed with the appropriate connections.

·          Most definitely, their visas cannot be relied on since they are using borrowed IDs.

·          Undoubtedly, the wisdom ascribed to them is not original but banal.

·         Even the x-rays they use are embellished to support their “virtual” IDs because the facts don’t support their assumed alter egos.

·         Their yearbooks are definitely invalid and cannot be relied on for the obvious reasons, because these can be doctored with the right donations and

·         In reality, these individuals are “Zebras”, as they are of one pigmentation (or identity) externally, (or in public) but marked by a completely different color (or identity) underneath (or privately).   

ADVERTISING’S TRUE PURPOSE - UPDATED

This post is being updated to include another advertising gimmick used by some as marketing tools, which have to be carefully weighed because of the implications of the inherent especially in the "hands" of those with a manipulative message agenda (see the highlighted text below).
As described in the dictionary, advertising is the “action of calling something to the attention of the public especially by paid announcements”, and this capability in the hands of those individuals/entities with the resources to carry out such, have the potential to be an effective force for change. However, change can be either positive or negative and it’s not often possible to differentiate between those whose intent is bent on deception as oppose to those genuinely using this effective tool. Therefore, the object of this post is to provide a cross-sectional view of this instrument’s basic premise up-front in order that the greater awareness tools available will enable this skill to be implemented in separating fact from fiction in advertising methods, regardless of the players involved. While familiarity with bait and switch after the fact methods is widely known, the main thrust of this post is to provide before hand knowledge to avoid falling gullible after the fact.
Selling is an “art form” based either on coercing, manipulating, seducing and convincing individuals to: sign up for, commit to, behave in a manner different than normally practiced and carrying out purchases of products and/or services whether or not the need exists. The simplest method of advertising is the use of a “pitch” person approach, whether male, female or other (ex. a mascot type character). However, this approach is the easiest to abuse mainly because the emotions of individuals are being appealed to just as occurs when a suitor (wanted or otherwise) appeals to prospective person of interest, where tales of abusive “pick-up lines” are commonplace. In addition, other abusive practice includes the use of “family” members (for example children) in ad placements (see the post WHY DO “VIRTUAL” SOCIETY TYPES RELY ON“SOFT TOUCH” ADVERTISING?) More difficult to engineer are ads using or involving everyday members of the public as spokespersons. These can be the most effective because they involve individuals with whom the public can identify with depending the target audience, to achieve their desired objective. However, those with ulterior motives can also abuse this method. Case in point, some advertisers go out of their way to highlight that “REAL” customers are being used in their ads. Most likely, those taking the time to draw attention to this fact are probably not being truthful in their ads in this matter. On this point, a useful starting is provided for the next “cliché” used by some in their marketing strategy, namely the use of “TRUTH” by some to infer that there version of whatever is being sold is somehow more “valid” than others in their field. However, if this approach is carefully considered, who in business today, whose premise is profit-making first at the expense of all else, if a more in-depth evaluation is carried out; can make the claim that they are bastions of “truth”. In reality none can, for dictatorial environments, regardless of the format truth is whatever is convenient. For example there is also what I refer to as “new truth” (see the post MERE OBJECTS FOR THE LEGITIMACY OF OTHERS), and other variations of “truth” such as, 1) “truth” in accounting, 2) “truth” in advertising, 3) “truth” in campaigning, 4) “truth” in lending, & 5) “truth” in spending, etc., therefore what is the absolute truth that business types advocate and who has it, in reality, none do, otherwise they would place themselves in the position of telling us what is best for us and they should not be. As a result, it is false in the end for a single entity to market as if they are the cornerstone of “truth” regardless of the product being marketed. Finally, it must be pointed out that most successful establishments, carve out a niche in their prospective marketplaces that others then try to duplicate on, which their successful marketing/advertising campaigns are based, whether its from the costs, upscale, boutique or trendy, etc. type approaches in the various marketplaces. On occasion however, a complete paradigm shift occurs in a market, (ex. an earthquake takes place), which completely transforms a marketplace “overnight” (for example the introduction of digital watches versus the previous Swiss-based market standard, analog type), making a different set of players capable of vying for ad dominance market share in he new environment. However, most market shifts and the outmoded advertising methods of the losers take place over longer periods and the successful methods of the new player(s) are visible with their growth/successful advertising evident. Five and Dime stores and airlines are examples of such market losers to mention a few. This practice is also successfully used in the remaking of political candidates over time from unacceptable to being viewed as traditional and advertising whether skillfully marketed and packaged or the proverbial “wolf’ being remade in “sheep’s clothing”, approach, all rely on change, (see the post CHANGE). In closing, let me reinforce that now armed with this information, we can choose to: refrain from signing up for unneeded things, end over committing, making alterations unless they actually enhance and avoid purchasing either products or services simply because it’s a fad. In this manner, WE CAN BECOME MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE PURCHASERS, RESIDENTS AND/OR CITIZENS ETC, ALIKE, EVEN IF ONLY A FEW OF US DO        
 

STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE UPDATED W/INSERTS

This amendment to he previous post STRATEGIC NMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE UPDATED was carried out to include additional details of specific direct communication with the Utility industry in Hawaii, which was the focus of the previously updated post to point out that communication was established with the utility industry in Hawaii and this Entity had the opportunity for awareness on their part even if indirectly about the events/actions that occurred, (see below included photos), provided to maintain my conclusion previously drawn, as well as to include the details previously excluded to show the extent to, which opportunity for manipulation, mirroring and making a mockery of society’s instruments to “create”, “stage” and relentlessly mirror fictional “Society’s” types in an effort to alter history.

Communication with Hawaiian Electric Co from June, 2000 just prior to the time of the start-up of the Proprietorship that establishes a timeline for Conservery founding since contractual services were being offered only.   



Part of facsimile transmittal from June 2000

Follow-up transmittal to reply received from utility dated June 12, 2000 expressly emphasizing the type of services being offered 

This topic strategic numbers and labels would not be completed without including an aspect, which now turned out differently than envisioned, and has its place in history nevertheless, is the meeting of the individual would later become my spouse while visiting her home with her parents who resided on Long Island, at the time when her late father was still alive, but who herself lived in New Haven, CT. The transportation establishment used to visit her in New Haven, CT was Greyhound Bus. This trip even though I did now know it at time was to a City that would later be my first residence after my school years. There are those who are of the opinion that changing identities is as easy as transforming from an electric utility to a communication entity, relocating from VT to Fairfield County, CT making this their base and connecting itself to the largest utility in this State (IA) as well as to the main electric utility service in Hawaii (because contact had been made with that State, see below photos, even though it was later sold off); entitles this entity to alter convenient historical records (in Connecticut and selected others), while eliminating others in their effort to cover-up the events, which took place in Vermont in 1989/1990 by creating “new truth”, that these “Society’s” types were “magically” in Connecticut at the same as I (see the series of posts on the subject NON-EXISTENT SOCIAL ETHICS IN A SOCIETY RUN BY “VIRTUALS” - UPDATED/REVISED, GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AND EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY, THE COEXISTENCE OF DISSOLUTION AND TRIUMPH - UPDATED as well as CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS). Even though my marital relationship, (which started in New York state) ended in divorce after nearly approximately thirty (30) of marriage, it was an event in history that rearranging identities, staging accidents, stealing a State tax refund check (see the post and attempting to subtly alter selected historical events also does not alter.

HOW DOES STATE SPONSORED ID THEFT WORK?

I am stating at the outset that I’m not an expert in this field, because of my desire not to take credit for activities successful carried out by others. However, an attempt will be made to provide a glimpse into some developments experienced in order that a “window” into this secretive “Society’s” types world can be gained and appropriate conclusions drawn. I find it ironic that “Society’s” types, living their dual lives at the expense of others, never seem to be around and operating the very vehicles claimed as their own when negative events such as accidents, etc. “coincidentally” occur! See the following examples:

1.   Operating the 1999 Ford Expedition in early November 2000 when a deer either “wondered” or was startled by a “hunter” (conveniently at the exact time we were traveling on Hwy 151 in Jones County), into the path of this vehicle. This deer “accident” required front-end bodywork and it was dropped off for such in the late morning of January 24, 2001 (see the post CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 THROUGH 2005 ARBITRARILY).

2.   Operating the Ford minivan rental on the afternoon of January 24, 2001 (after the Expedition was dropped off for the indicated work above), and, which was later totaled by a “stunt driver” in a VW Jetta. This vehicle that was supposed to be dropped off at the airport the following day in order to complete the planned Trinidad trip was unrecognizably totaled, (see the post TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF REASONS FOR EXCLUDING LOCATIONS FROM CONSIDERATION).

3.   Operating the 2001 Dodge minivan in the summer of 2007 when an intimidation/harassment type incident occurred at a Marion, IA park by a representative of the State’s Largest Electric Utility, (see the post THE TIME HAS COME).

4.   Operating the same 2001 Dodge Minivan on June 21, 2007 a short time after the Park incident when the same 2001 Dodge Minivan was totaled on Hwy 151 in Marion, shortly after improperly attached tire lugs disintegrate on Hwy 151 in Marion on June 17, 2007. This development occurred shortly after having brake work carried out at a Marion, IA area establishment on June 14, 2007. My current 2002 Chevy Venture vehicle is a replacement for the Dodge Minivan that was involved in the above accident.

This synopsis clearly shows that the very individuals claiming their dual identities were never around for these actual incidents, even though some enterprising Municipal and other Agencies/employee(s) attempt to transfer “hollow” identities by various methods (see the posts ADDENDUM TO GIVING “LIFE”THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED FOR AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY, GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY- UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY as well as the descriptive narrative included with the photo for the post THE TIME HAS COME). However, these individuals are always on hand to take credit for anything notable that assists in providing them the convenient cloak needed for their dual identities; with resources that can’t be legitimately explained (see the post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE), maintained by FREQUENTING PAST  ESTABLISHMENTS AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY as well as ably assisted by “grateful” ethically challenged politicos (with “outstretched” hands).

A TRIBUTE OF SORTS TO A LOST ANNIVERSARY

Some anniversaries produce positives and others negatives,
It’s notable, the lengths some “Types” will go to, in the effort to make fictional links relatives,
By rewriting historical and other events to produce the desired “superlatives”,
Brought about by manipulated “coincidences”, that is called clear,
By those with financial visions so dear.
Nevertheless, only by “connecting the dots” left bare,
Can fact be separated from fiction,
And new academic titles can be completed without addition.
However, histories and accomplishments obtained by subtraction,
Are as fleeting as a scented potion,
Conjured up by individual/entities with savory “lotion”.
But this also will not stand the test of time,
Because, achievements obtained by stealing,
And relying on continuous historical pealing,
To make impostors legitimate by duplicating,
Will falter like the “Apian Way”, when “real” change is made lasting,
In spite of all efforts to suppress with financial jousting,
That will fade because of the mockery emanating,
From the “Halls of Power”, obtained through deceiving.
Oh for a better method than from those who believe in pilfering,
and not in "true" relinquishing!!!



The references for this narrative include the following:

COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS
 
RESTRICTING AND EXCLUDING

ADDENDUM TO GIVING "LIFE" THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY
 
THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION

“VIRTUALS”AND THEIR SELECTION OF LABELS AND NUMBERS
 
GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY

MISREPRESENTATION DEFINED (FOR THE RECORD) - AMENDED

CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS

THIS IS NOT A “VIRTUAL” ENDORSEMENT BUT A HOPE EXPRESSED

HOW TO IMPLEMENT IDENTITY THEFT AND LEGITIMIZE FRAUD

CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 TO 2005 ARBITRARILY

ARBITRARY ACTION OR IS IT?

COMPANIONSHIP - A PERSONAL VIEWPOINT




 

STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE UPDATED

This post (STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE) was updated to include additional details previously excluded to show the extent to, which an entity manipulated, mirrored and made a mockery of society’s instruments to “create”, “stage” and relentlessly mirror fictional “Society’s” types in an effort to alter history.
This topic strategic numbers and labels would not be completed without including an aspect, which now turned out differently than envisioned, and has its place in history nevertheless, is the meeting of the individual would later become my spouse while visiting her home with her parents who resided on Long Island, at the time when her late father was still alive, but who herself lived in New Haven, CT. The transportation establishment used to visit her in New Haven, CT was Greyhound Bus. This trip even though I did now know it at time was to a City that would later be my first residence after my school years. There are those who are of the opinion that changing identities is as easy as transforming from an electric utility to a communication entity, relocating from VT to Fairfield County, CT making this their base and connecting itself to the largest utility in this State (IA) as well as to the main electric utility service in Hawaii (because contact had been made with that State, see below photos, even though it was later sold off); entitles this entity to alter

Communication with the State of Hawaii, (which others took credit for)

convenient historical records (in Connecticut and selected others), while eliminating others in their effort to cover-up the events, which took place in Vermont in 1989/1990 by creating “new truth”, that these “Society’s” types were “magically” in Connecticut at the same as I (see the series of posts on the subject NON-EXISTENT SOCIAL ETHICS IN A SOCIETY RUN BY “VIRTUALS” - UPDATED/REVISED, in addition to GIVING“LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY UPDATED FOR AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY , THE COEXISTENCE OF DISSOLUTION AND TRIUMPH - UPDATED as well as CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS). Even though my marital relationship, (which started in New York state) ended in divorce after nearly approximately thirty (30) of marriage, it was an event in history that rearranging identities, staging accidents, stealing a State tax refund check (see the post MISREPRESENTATION DEFINED (FOR THE RECORD) - AMENDED) and attempting to subtly alter selected historical events, also does not alter.

ADVERTISING’S TRUE PURPOSE

As described in the dictionary, advertising is the “action of calling something to the attention of the public especially by paid announcements”, and this capability in the hands of those individuals/entities with the resources to carry out such, have the potential to be an effective force for change. However, change can be either positive or negative and it’s not often possible to differentiate between those whose intent is bent on deception as oppose to those genuinely using this effective tool. Therefore, the object of this post is to provide a cross-sectional view of this instrument’s basic premise up-front in order that the greater awareness tools available will enable this skill to be implemented in separating fact from fiction in advertising methods, regardless of the players involved. While familiarity with bait and switch after the fact methods is widely known, the main thrust of this post is to provide before hand knowledge to avoid falling gullible later.
Selling is an “art form” based either on coercing, manipulating, seducing and convincing individuals to: sign up for, commit to, behave in a manner different than normally practiced and carrying out purchases of products and/or services whether or not the need exists. The simplest method of advertising is the use of a “pitch” person approach, whether male, female or other (ex. a mascot type character). However, this approach is the easiest to abuse mainly because the emotions of individuals are being appealed to just as occurs when a suitor (wanted or otherwise) appeals to a prospective person of interest and where tales of abusive “pick-up lines” are commonplace, along with the dissastrous relationships and/or "lemons" that are strewn along the way, abound. In addition, other abusive practice includes the use of “family” members (for example children) in ad placements (see the post WHY DO “VIRTUAL” SOCIETY TYPES RELY ON “SOFT TOUCH”ADVERTISING?). More difficult to engineer are ads using or involving everyday members of the public as spokespersons. These can be the most effective because they involve individuals with whom the public can identify with depending the target audience, to achieve their desired objective. However, those with ulterior motives can also abuse this method. Case in point, some advertisers go out of their way to highlight that “REAL” customers are being used in their ads. Most likely, those taking the time to draw attention to this fact are probably not being truthful in their ads in this matter.
Finally, it must be pointed out that most successful establishments, carve out a niche in their prospective marketplaces that others then try to duplicate on, which their successful marketing/advertising campaigns are based, whether its from the costs, upscale, boutique or trendy, etc. type approaches in the various marketplaces. On occasion however, a complete paradigm shift occurs in a market, (ex. an earthquake takes place), which completely transforms a marketplace “overnight” (for example the introduction of digital watches versus the previous Swiss-based market standard, analog type), making a different set of players capable of vying for ad dominance market share in he new environment. However, most market shifts and the outmoded advertising methods of the losers take place over longer periods and the successful methods of the new player(s) are visible with their growth/successful advertising evident. Five and Dime stores and airlines are examples of such market losers to mention a few. This practice is also successfully used in the remaking of political candidates over time from unacceptable to being viewed as traditional and advertising whether skillfully marketed and packaged or the proverbial “wolf’ being remade in “sheep’s clothing”, approach, all rely on change, (see the post CHANGE). In closing, let me reinforce that now armed with this information, we can choose to: refrain from signing up for unneeded things, end over committing, making alterations unless they actually enhance and avoid purchasing either products or services simply because it’s a fad. In this manner, WE CAN BECOME MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE PURCHASERS, RESIDENTS AND/OR CITIZENS ETC, ALIKE, EVEN IF ONLY A FEW OF US DO.   

THE COMPANIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSISTENCY AND TRANSPARENCY

This theme/topic for the month of April is being supplemented for relevancy, as follows:
It is impossible to demonstrate transparency without being consistent. For example, using one selected label (or name - see the post THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS lN TODAY'S "VIRTUAL" SOCIETY), in public life and then another privately and internationally “after the fact” because of legal/immigration issues and then attempting to legitimize such by the manipulation of historical financial and other records, that include the creating of a fictional branch of a family name [see the post MISREPRESENTATION DEFINED (FOR THE RECORD) - AMENDED]; is only credible to those who make it a practice of wearing “blinders”, and others who place emphasis on finances only (see the post HOW IS ARBITRARY ACTION, OR IS IT CONNECTED TO STRATEGIC LABELS AND NUMBERS?). For example, I chose not to demonstrate legitimacy by “brandishing” historical financial records now absconded by others for “their brand of legitimacy”; but instead took the path of demonstrating such by overlooked, everyday details without, which it would be impossible to maintain a daily life, even for a self-described, “organizing/record-keeping nerd”. My records are not based on the life of any individual and do not require an on going “army” of self-interest type business and ethically challenged politicos to “prop up” (see the comment from 9/3/2012 on the post “VIRTUAL" USED CARS - THE CONNECTION on the COMMENTS Page). 
In conclusion, it must be pointed out that for a “Society’s" type individual with a “virtual” identity, it’s impossible to demonstrate transparency, where an alter ego is in use and another individual has to be imprisoned financially to legitimize such, which is ultimately a band aid to cover-up the events from 1989/1990 in Vermont (see the post THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION) and requires continuous “tweaking” to attempt to fix the gaping flaws in this type of legitimacy, which lacks consistency. It is for this reason that it can only exist by FREQUENTING PAST ESTABLISHMENTS AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY- UPDATED, which is devoid of historical basis that is not in part borrowed from another. In the end, it has to be emphasized that in the absence of consistency, transparency is non-existent, no matter how many avenues are repeatedly massaged to attempt to demonstrate something that does not exist, namely, validity and/or authenticity using “cherry picking” to assemble the desired “virtual records” needed.