This outline was amended to include a critical reference for awareness purposes, labeled (NEW).
Misrepresentation for the purpose of this discussion, as documented in the Proprietorship’s “Services Offering/Business Arrangements Update” of 8/21/2012 (see copy below), includes but is not limited to: identity switching; mail diversion; medical/other records duplication and actively using all forms of unethical practices to maintain such as legitimate (up to an including the staging of accidents see the post CRISES “INDUCED” IDENTITY TRANSFER); frequenting past establishments in order to attempt to demonstrate a legitimacy that begins and ends within the State’s borders (see the series of posts on STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE, GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY- UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY W/INSERTS andTHE COEXISTENCE OF DISSOLUTION AND TRIUMPH - UPDATED); income tax fraud involving: a) manipulating the tax code to provide Society’s” types advance awareness that they will be able to “file taxes legally”, b) stealing a State tax refund check (to assist in the filing of taxes legally) and c) the use of my children’s identities for legitimacy while transferring their accomplishments to other “Society’s” types (see the post "MISNUMBERING" AND ITS IMPLICATIONS); financial/bank records manipulation/transfer; the reliance on a plethora of “questionable” entities and ethically challenged “politicos” at all levels (federal, state & local) for non-existent legitimacy and assigning accomplishments to others while using Municipal/other similar resources to maintain/support“State” sponsored identity switching (see the post GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE).
The references for this carefully developed description are as follows:
Misrepresentation for the purpose of this discussion, as documented in the Proprietorship’s “Services Offering/Business Arrangements Update” of 8/21/2012 (see copy below), includes but is not limited to: identity switching; mail diversion; medical/other records duplication and actively using all forms of unethical practices to maintain such as legitimate (up to an including the staging of accidents see the post CRISES “INDUCED” IDENTITY TRANSFER); frequenting past establishments in order to attempt to demonstrate a legitimacy that begins and ends within the State’s borders (see the series of posts on STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE, GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY- UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY W/INSERTS andTHE COEXISTENCE OF DISSOLUTION AND TRIUMPH - UPDATED); income tax fraud involving: a) manipulating the tax code to provide Society’s” types advance awareness that they will be able to “file taxes legally”, b) stealing a State tax refund check (to assist in the filing of taxes legally) and c) the use of my children’s identities for legitimacy while transferring their accomplishments to other “Society’s” types (see the post "MISNUMBERING" AND ITS IMPLICATIONS); financial/bank records manipulation/transfer; the reliance on a plethora of “questionable” entities and ethically challenged “politicos” at all levels (federal, state & local) for non-existent legitimacy and assigning accomplishments to others while using Municipal/other similar resources to maintain/support“State” sponsored identity switching (see the post GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE).
The references for this carefully developed description are as follows:
- NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK (NEW)
 |
| Conservery Services Offering/Business Arrangements Updated of 8/21/2012 |
8 comments:
The manipulating of “employment” records by “questionable communication entities” hiding behind labels that convey “national” significance, to give “Society’s” types the appearance of having connections in surrounding and other carefully selected States in fictional identities, neither counts as credible nor authentic for the purpose of legitimacy, which isn’t borrowed or unethically obtained.
The following are the implications of the Brazant Divorce Decree of 4/16/2012 - Case No: CDDM 001638, (see the post STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE - link on COMMENTS Page):
1. James F. Brazant was a resident of Jones County prior to and throughout the hearing (and is finalizing out-of-State relocation plans)
2. His former spouse have no source(s) of income & was awarded their former jointly owned asset (8263 140th Ave, Olin, IA 52320-7708) as she was a stay at home mother/educator since 1988.
3. James F. Brazant has no other residence outside the former jointly owned (previously referenced).
Since these are the facts, how is it possible for any “Society’s” type individual WHO HAS NEVER BEEN A LEGAL RESIDENT of Jones County and legally resides in Linn County as always; claim to be James F. Brazant and connected to the Olin, IA residence at 8263 140th Avenue? For the record, occasionally allowing mail to be delivered here in this manner (see photo included below - on COMMENTS Page) or some other “creative” and/or misleading format does not make any individual a legal resident to the best of my understanding; no matter how many “politicos and others” award an alter ego to such “virtuals”.
It should not come as a surprise that those with an aversion to due process or “Society’s” types whose legitimacy is based on: 1) mail fraud (see the post GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY - links on COMMENTS Page), 2) check stealing (see the post NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK - link on COMMENTS Page), 3) continuously backdating records to address or cover-up “facts” that are inconsistent with historical events (see the posts THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION and CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 THROUGH 2005 ARBITRARILY - links on COMMENTS Page), 4) the acquisition of property that cannot be demonstrated legitimately, because it’s almost as if one day the prior residents were occupants and the next new “occupiers” take over without valid purchase records (see the post “VIRTUAL” HOUSING ARRANGEMENTS- link on COMMENTS Page), and 5) the manipulation of the tax code and reliance on a stolen State Tax Refund check, previously mentioned, to file taxes “legally” (see the post ADDENDUM TO COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - link on COMMENTS Page); have little regard for Court rulings, because they cannot use the Courts in their “alter egos”, which they are not known publicly by but have assumed conveniently for legitimacy and are validated by the “king-makers” of society and ethically challenged politicos. Therefore, why should there be surprise on the part of those who don’t subscribe to such actions, that these types act with impunity and blatantly disregard legal processes unless they are being manipulated for their benefit, after all these unfortunately are the methods/standards of the “Society’s” types. Oh! For! The! Day! When! CHANGE! Is! Allowed! To! Move! Forward!
Relying on selective establishments that knowingly allow “Society’s” types to use “virtual” identities and then magically “duplicate” historical records “dreamed-up” by the “king-makers” of society types, whose only interest is "wealth generation at any cost", (see the post HOW IS ARBITRARY ACTION OR IS IT CONNECTED TO STRATEGIC LABELS AND NUMBERS - UPDATED? - link on COMMENTS Page), not on accuracy and/or authenticity. Perpatrating such actions as “a mark” of historical identity is never a recipe for credible legitimacy, because it requires continuous manipulating of events/records, etc to cover-up the escaping "tide"!
It should not come as a surprise that those with an aversion to due process or “Society’s” types whose legitimacy is based on: 1) mail fraud (see the post GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY - links on COMMENTS Page), 2) check stealing (see the post NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK - link on COMMENTS Page), 3) continuously backdating records to address or cover-up “facts” that are inconsistent with historical events (see the posts THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION and CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 THROUGH 2005 ARBITRARILY - links on COMMENTS Page), 4) the acquisition of property that cannot be demonstrated legitimately, because it’s almost as if one day the prior residents were occupants and the next new “occupiers” take over without valid purchase records (see the below photo of "VIRTUAL” HOUSING ARRANGEMENTS on COMMENTS Page), and 5) the manipulation of the tax code and reliance on a stolen State Tax Refund check, previously mentioned, to file taxes “legally” (see the post ADDENDUM TO COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - link on COMMENTS Page); have little regard for Court rulings, because they cannot use the Courts in their “alter egos”, which they are not known publicly by but have assumed conveniently for legitimacy and are validated by the “king-makers” of society and ethically challenged politicos. Therefore, why should there be surprise on the part of those who don’t subscribe to such actions, that these types act with impunity and blatantly disregard legal processes unless they are being manipulated for their benefit, after all these unfortunately are the methods/standards of the “Society’s” types. Oh! For! The! Day! When! CHANGE! Is! Allowed! To! Move! Forward!
Post a Comment