MISNUMBERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

WHILE IN IOWA CITY ON (3/17/2012) AFTER VISITING WITH MY DAUGHTER AT THE HOSPITAL, I DROPPED BY THE LOCAL VEHICLE SERVICE ENTITY AS SHOWN BELOW. BEFORE PROCEEDING, I WANT TO THANK THOSE WHO TOOK THE TIME TO SERVICE THE VEHICLE. EVEN THOUGH THE WORKERS APPEARED TO BE “DILIGENT”, THEY APPARENTLY HAVE DEFICIENCIES WHEN IT COMES TO DOCUMENTING NUMBERS WITHIN CLOSE APPROXIMATION TO THE REQUIRED ACCURACY. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ODOMETER MILEAGE READING WAS RECORDED AS 137,219 MILES, WHEN THIS WAS CLEARLY NOT THE CASE, AS SHOWN IN THE PHOTOS OF THE

Invoice for Service Completed on 3/17/2012 with Actual Odometer Reading

ACTUAL ODOMETER READING (TAKEN AN HOUR AFTER THE WORK WAS COMPLETED). IN ADDITION, MY ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER DETAILS WERE RECORDED AS 170^TH INSTEAD OF 140TH AVENUE AND THE CRITICAL IDENTIFIER PART OF MY PHONE NUMBER WAS RECORDED AS 593 INSTEAD OF 531. NOW AM I TO CONCLUDE THAT THESE WERE DELIBERATE ACTIONS? (SEE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY'S "VIRTUAL" SOCIETY  AND WHO ARE THE REAL OWNERS OF THE NO. 37 "VIRTUAL" PLAYBOOK?).