Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

Saturday, March 31, 2012

ELECTRONIC RECORDS FRAUD AND LEGITIMACY

This is a Supplement to the post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE to serve the purpose of reminding those that rely on stealing records for legitimacy that this is an unsustainable course. For example, my daughter Danielle, called the home residence on three (3) occasions today, first at 8:43 am, the second was around 4:00 pm and finally at 7:41 pm, (see photos) when I discussed


Danielle's Calls in-part of 3/31/2012

with her at length, various details about her stay at her current rehabilitation center, as I had with the Facility’s Representative at the time of admission, her medical and vehicle insurance-related details, (which she should not yet be focusing on). However, by the time I got around to recording the approximate 4:00 pm call around the time of the last call, all the earlier calls had been wiped clean from the phone and only replaced with the last call at 7:41 pm. LET ME TAKE THE TIME TO REMIND THOSE WHO THINK THAT STEALING ELECTRONIC RECORDS FROM THE LAND-LINE PHONE AS PROOF OF THEIR CONNECTION TO THIS RESIDENCE AHEAD OF THE DIVORCE HEARING, (REGARDLESS OF WHOM OR WHICH ENTITY IS PROVIDING BACKING FOR SUCH ACTIVITIES); THINK AGAIN, YOUR DECEPTION ENDS HERE!

5 comments:

J_F_Brazant said...

THIS IS NOT THE FIRST OCCASION ON, WHICH SUCH ACTIVITY HAS BEEN NOTICED, ESPECIALLY WITH CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS CALLING. HOWEVER, SINCE I WAS INVOLVED IN THESE SPECIFIC CALLS, THEIR ACTIVITY WAS DOCUMENTED TO EXPOSE THOSE WHO ARE FEIGNING CONNECTION EITHER TO THIS RESIDENCE OR TO MY DAUGHTER AS A MEANS OF LEGITIMACY FOR THEIR "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES.

J_F_Brazant said...

Arranging a "Scholarship" for my daughter through Principal Financial, does not make her "related" to anyone who was supposed to be in Iowa uninterrupted during the years she was born and grew up (according to the Company's Annual Report) and staging an "accident" to cover-up the crimes committed, is not the answer. The 03 and 88 in the Police Report does NOT connect any "virtual" ID thief to Connecticut (because Danielle was actually born in at home in 508 Still Hill Road, Hamden). This would be an indication that ficititous Annual Reports were intentionally prepared for Shareholders and the SEC.

J_F_Brazant said...

On the other hand, If any entity submitted intentionally fictitious Annual Reports to Shareholders and especially the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and is not concerned about the ramifications of such action, that is NOT saying a great deal for the political process. This is the kind of change that Conservery was envisioned to address (see the video CHANGE IS ON THE WAY), not condone and uphold.

J_F_Brazant said...

Now if you have submitted such Reports to the SEC, A CLEAR CHOICE is ahead and the WAY OUT is definitely not a continuation of the same, namely, LIVING IN THE SHADOWS of another's identity and "hoping" that: 1) "accidents", 2) "business as usual politics" and 3) "networking and deal-making" will somehow miraculouusly make a "virtual" world become reality

J_F_Brazant said...

Public Servants were not placed in office to target Institutions to pressure them into providing manipulated reports about patients in return for maintaining their Federal Funding; all in the name of covering-up identity-related questionable “accident” crimes, carried out by those who business models are based on either “staging” or benefiting from such, while hiding behind SOFT-TOUCH ADVERTISING.