This is a Supplement to the
post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE to serve
the purpose of reminding those that rely on stealing records for legitimacy
that this is an unsustainable course. For example, my daughter Danielle, called
the home residence on three (3) occasions today, first at 8:43 am, the second
was around 4:00 pm and finally at 7:41 pm, (see photos) when I discussed
Danielle's Calls in-part of 3/31/2012 |
with
her at length, various details about her stay at her current rehabilitation
center, as I had with the Facility’s Representative at the time of
admission, her medical and vehicle insurance-related details, (which she should not yet
be focusing on). However, by the time I got around to recording the approximate
4:00 pm call around the time of the last call, all the earlier calls had been
wiped clean from the phone and only replaced with the last call at 7:41 pm. LET
ME TAKE THE TIME TO REMIND THOSE WHO THINK THAT STEALING ELECTRONIC RECORDS
FROM THE LAND-LINE PHONE AS PROOF OF THEIR CONNECTION TO THIS RESIDENCE AHEAD
OF THE DIVORCE HEARING, (REGARDLESS OF WHOM OR WHICH ENTITY IS PROVIDING BACKING FOR SUCH ACTIVITIES); THINK AGAIN, YOUR DECEPTION ENDS HERE!
5 comments:
THIS IS NOT THE FIRST OCCASION ON, WHICH SUCH ACTIVITY HAS BEEN NOTICED, ESPECIALLY WITH CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS CALLING. HOWEVER, SINCE I WAS INVOLVED IN THESE SPECIFIC CALLS, THEIR ACTIVITY WAS DOCUMENTED TO EXPOSE THOSE WHO ARE FEIGNING CONNECTION EITHER TO THIS RESIDENCE OR TO MY DAUGHTER AS A MEANS OF LEGITIMACY FOR THEIR "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES.
Arranging a "Scholarship" for my daughter through Principal Financial, does not make her "related" to anyone who was supposed to be in Iowa uninterrupted during the years she was born and grew up (according to the Company's Annual Report) and staging an "accident" to cover-up the crimes committed, is not the answer. The 03 and 88 in the Police Report does NOT connect any "virtual" ID thief to Connecticut (because Danielle was actually born in at home in 508 Still Hill Road, Hamden). This would be an indication that ficititous Annual Reports were intentionally prepared for Shareholders and the SEC.
On the other hand, If any entity submitted intentionally fictitious Annual Reports to Shareholders and especially the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and is not concerned about the ramifications of such action, that is NOT saying a great deal for the political process. This is the kind of change that Conservery was envisioned to address (see the video CHANGE IS ON THE WAY), not condone and uphold.
Now if you have submitted such Reports to the SEC, A CLEAR CHOICE is ahead and the WAY OUT is definitely not a continuation of the same, namely, LIVING IN THE SHADOWS of another's identity and "hoping" that: 1) "accidents", 2) "business as usual politics" and 3) "networking and deal-making" will somehow miraculouusly make a "virtual" world become reality
Public Servants were not placed in office to target Institutions to pressure them into providing manipulated reports about patients in return for maintaining their Federal Funding; all in the name of covering-up identity-related questionable “accident” crimes, carried out by those who business models are based on either “staging” or benefiting from such, while hiding behind SOFT-TOUCH ADVERTISING.
Post a Comment