THE PURPOSE OF THIS POST
IS TO MAKE LEGITIMATE BUSINESS OPERATORS AWARE THAT THIS CHECK (SHOWN
BELOW), IF PRESENTED OR DEPOSITED AT ANY INSTITUTION, THAT IT WAS OBTAINED
FRAUDULENTLY AFTER BEING CASHED ON 5/12/2012 AND SHOULD BE REPORTED AS SUCH.
 |
| COPY OF CHECK STOLEN BY IDENTITY THIEVES IN NEED OF LEGITIMACY |
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NUMBER OF YEARS OF OPERATION BY
ANY OPERATOR IN PROVIDING SUPPORT FOR THE UNETHICAL OBTAINING OF A STATE INCOME
TAX REFUND CHECK TO PROVIDE LEGITIMACY FOR “VIRTUAL” IMPOSTORS, SHOULD NOT BE
RELIED ON, FOR THIS IS NOT AN INDICATION OF LEGITIMACY, THERE ARE MANY EXAMPLES
OF FRAUD TAKING PLACE AT COMPANIES WITH LONG HISTORIES TO REMAIN IN BUSINESS, (EX:
BEAR STERNS, ARTHUR ANDERSON, LEHMAN BROTHERS ETC.) The Posts : RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD, RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD - UPDATED and RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD - UPDATED/AMENDED all provide background detaills about this incident.
4 comments:
A State’s ex CEO whose “virtual” qualifications were “earned” through recent tragedy (see the post THE UNDERLYING REASON WHY BETTER EXAMPLES ARE SO DIFFICULT TO BE REALIZED), cannot be relied on to corroborate the accomplishments of anyone ethically, regardless of whose “soft” or “medium” touch advertisements are providing “virtual” support for him to “repeat what he is told”, and call (the unethical practices used to steal a State of Iowa Income Tax Refund Check), original. The only thing original about it is the deceptive manner in, which the "planted" worker was trained to perpetrate her unethical craft practices. The problem here is that this former CEO may not be aware of the difference between ethical and unethical.
The reason why these “virtuals” are so blatant and confident in carrying STATE INCOME CHECK STEALING, as documented in this posts as well as the series of posts on the subject RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD – UPDATED/AMENDED, - links on COMMENTS Page), is because of the following conditions. I had always wondered why this form of address (see photo on COMMENTS Page) was periodically used to address my now “former” spouse and since first being implemented in Vermont and the only conclusion that can be drawn is that ID fraud is institutionalized at all levels to support a “virtual” process maintained by those who benefit from it financially. What I have come to realize is that this address implies that some “virtual” impostor is hiding behind my name (A NON US CITIZEN) mangled with my ex spouse’s records (A US CITIZEN) for legitimacy. It would not surprise me if this impostor weren’t using her social security no (10X-4X-209X) since she has not been in the workforce, since teaching in New Haven, in 1988. Only those with significant Networking capability can get away with fraud of this magnitude and continually thwart the system by controlling who is and isn't elected, to maintain the system of kickbacks from these impostors indebted and loyal beyond “bounds” for their new found “lives” (see the link - CAN MY INVESTMENTS REALLY STAND UP TO INTENSE SCRUTINY? - on the COMMENTS Page).
This Comment is being updated to include links to a series of supporting posts on this same topic entitled NON EXISTENT SOCIAL ETHICS IN A SOCIETY RUN BY “VIRTUALS” – UPDATED/REVISED (link on COMMENTS Page), as well as to posts about "virtuals" and their tax filng methods and others on the subject matter for emphasis. This subject depicts the lengths the “virtual” society will go to in the name of covering up a simple event in Vermont, carried out BY ONE OF THEIR "VIRTUALS" (see IDENTITY SWITCHING OVER THE YEARS COMPACTED FOR THE RECORD for associated details and an applicable letter in the post A CHAPTER CLOSED ON A RELATIONSHIP OF SORTS - links on COMMENTS Page), because they cannot take intense scrutiny for fear of exposure). This twenty-two (22) year-long price has been high, especially for the now voiceless along the way, unaware of why they were targeted.
The reason why these “virtuals” are so blatant and confident in carrying STATE INCOME CHECK STEALING, as documented in this post as well as the series of posts on the subject RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD – UPDATED/AMENDED, and RIGHTS GONE WRONG - UPDATED (links on COMMENTS Page), is because of the following conditions.
I had always wondered why this form of address (see photo on COMMENTS Page) was periodically used to address my now “former” spouse and since first being implemented in Vermont and the only conclusion that can be drawn is that ID fraud is institutionalized at all levels to support a “virtual” process maintained by those who benefit from it financially. What I have come to realize is that this address implies that some “virtual” impostor is hiding behind my name (A NON US CITIZEN) mangled with my ex spouse’s records (A US CITIZEN) for legitimacy. It would not surprise me if this impostor weren’t using her social security no (10X-4X-209X) since she has not been in the workforce, since teaching in New Haven, in 1988. Only those with significant Networking capability can get away with fraud of this magnitude and continually thwart the system by controlling who is and isn't elected, to maintain the system of kickbacks from these impostors indebted and loyal beyond “bounds” for their new found “indentities” (see the link - CAN MY INVESTMENTS REALLY STAND UP TO INTENSE SCRUTINY? - on the COMMENTS Page).
No individual who was connected with this Proprietorship in an advisory role (my son Dejon excluded), as well as myself, currently has a financial account at the local Citizen’s State Bank. This fact will be supported by the documentation from the Brazant Divorce if carefully reviewed (see the post STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS - THE FINALE - link on COMMENTS Page).
Post a Comment