Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

Friday, May 25, 2012

A LESSON IN 21ST CENTURY BANKING - AND HOW TO BOUNCE OFF AN INDIVIDUAL FOR LEGITIMACY AND INPRISON FINANCIALLY SIMULTANEOUSLY

I am not a cynical individual by nature, however, when my former place of Employment wrote me about a year ago (see photos below) indicating that
Communication Informing of "Discovery" of CBPP Funds Recived in Early Distribution 
they had suddenly “found” funds belonging to me from my Cash Balance Pension Plan that had been received in an Early Distribution, I was taken back especially from my previous experiences. I went along with this “apparent act of benevolence” and took it at face value, after all any individual/entity can have a FORK-IN-THE-ROAD situation. I have now come to realize that there was more to this “benevolent act” than at first appeared especially after the events associated with my State of Iowa, Income Tax Refund Check (see NOTICE OFSTOLEN CHECK and THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECONCILIATION).

Below is a listing of the distributions from this account and in my opinion
these canceled checks have been ending up in the fictitious account of some “virtual” impostor needing legitimacy, but propped-up by those institutions that are benefiting financially at the expense another who is being “bounced off” of to obtain legitimacy while the documentation of legitimacy (the deposition of these canceled financial instruments are being deposited in the accounts of some “virtual” bi-professional fraud who has made it through life by being “skill-less”). The legitimacy for these transactions are being attributed to others while phony reasons are passed on to me about not being able to reopen a simple checking account that is the only way the issuance of duplicate numbered checks can be explained, enabled by those who have decimated their public thrust while claiming phony wealth by selling-out citizens and non-citizens in exchange for phony “book sales” and other phony transactions (see below). That check issued to pay for two (2) months of my daughter’s
Double Numbered Checks on Separate Ocassions
portion of her shared apartment rent in excess, became null and void and the amount ended up in the account of some “fraud” in need of connection to Connecticut, without ever having lived there legitimately (and who is probably implicated in the events surrounding Danielle’s “accident” see HOW TO UTILIZE SECURE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CARRY OUT IDENTITY FRAUD - UPDATED?, WHO BENEFITS FROM DANIELLE’S CONDITION – UPDATED and CRISIS “INDUCED” IDENTITY TRANSFER) and is relying on "pigmentation" alone with the assistance of certain extensions to connect to my daughter and Connecicut by extension. This is how 21st Century Banking is implemented to prop-up “virtuals” (because the legitimate are not in need of political propping-up), at the expense of those who have really paid their dues.

5 comments:

J_F_Brazant said...

THEY ARE THOSE WHO ARE OF THE OPINION THAT ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS ILLEGALLY CONNECT TO SOME ACTION I HAVE CARRIED OUT, SUCH AS DEPOSIT NO. 724803239 MADE OUT TO STAPLES (WITH, WHICH I USED TO PURCHASE MY OFFICE SUPPLIES) IN THE ACCOUNT OF "VIRTUAL" IMPOSTOR, THEN BRIBE THE ORGANIZATION TO ADVERTISE TO THE FACT THAT, SUCH AN IMPOSTOR ACTUALLY PURCHASED THE OFFICE EQUIPMENT OR DEACTIVATE MY TEMPORARY DEBIT CARD COMMENSURATE WITH THE OCCURRENCE OF MY ATTEMPTING TO MAKE A PAYMENT FOR TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR THE NAME OF MY PROPRIETORSHIP, (WHICH I HAVE SINCE CANCELED PERMANENTLY) AND ACACTIVATING MY UNACTIVATED PERSONALIZED DEBIT CARD WITH CAREFULLY SELECTED NUMBERS (SEE PHOTO IN COMMENTS); AN DRAW THE CONCLUSION THAT SUCH ACTIONS "MAGICALLY" CONNECT THESE FRAUDS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS LEGITIMACY WITH THEIR DISRESPECTFUL ACTIONS (ABOUT, WHICH THEY BRAG - SEE THE POST "WHICH CATEGORY DO YOU FALL IN TODAY - UPDATED?").

J_F_Brazant said...

THEY ARE THOSE WHO ARE OF THE OPINION THAT ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS ILLEGALLY CONNECT TO SOME ACTION I HAVE CARRIED OUT, SUCH AS DEPOSIT CHECK NO. 724803239 MADE OUT TO STAPLES (WITH, WHICH I USED TO PURCHASE MY OFFICE SUPPLIES) IN THE ACCOUNT OF "VIRTUAL" IMPOSTOR, THEN BRIBE THE ORGANIZATION TO ADVERTISE TO THE FACT THAT, SUCH AN IMPOSTOR ACTUALLY PURCHASED THE OFFICE EQUIPMENT OR DEACTIVATE MY TEMPORARY DEBIT CARD COMMENSURATE WITH THE OCCURRENCE OF MY ATTEMPTING TO MAKE A PAYMENT FOR TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR THE NAME OF MY PROPRIETORSHIP, (WHICH I HAVE SINCE CANCELED PERMANENTLY) TO FORCE ME TO USE THIS CARD AND ACTIVATING MY UNACTIVATED PERSONALIZED DEBIT CARD WITH ITS CAREFULLY SELECTED NUMBERS (SEE PHOTO IN COMMENTS); AN DRAW THE CONCLUSION THAT SUCH ACTIONS "MAGICALLY" BRING THESE FRAUDS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS LEGITIMACY WITH THEIR DISRESPECTFUL ACTIONS (ABOUT, WHICH THEY BRAG - SEE THE POST "WHICH CATEGORY DO YOU FALL IN TODAY - UPDATED?").

J_F_Brazant said...

This IRA account is now considered CLOSED as of 5/31/2012!

J_F_Brazant said...

The 90-day WF “policy deadline” for removal of information concerning account details for this closed Roth IRA account (#594521326) is 8/29/12 and my personal information should be removed from their computer files automatically as previously informed, consistent with their "policy" in order to preclude “Society’s” types attempting to demonstrate legitimacy by reopening this old account [see the post FREQUENTING PAST ESTABLISHMNTS AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY- UPDATED (series) - link on COMMENTS Page].

J_F_Brazant said...

The 90-day WF “policy deadline” for removal of information concerning account details for this closed Roth IRA account (#594521326) (see below photo) is today 8/29/12 and my personal information should be removed from their computer files automatically as previously informed, consistent with their "policy" in order to preclude “Society’s” types attempting to demonstrate legitimacy by reopening this old account [see the post FREQUENTING PAST ESTABLISHMNTS AS A MARK OF LEGITIMACY- UPDATED (series) - link on COMMENTS Page].