This is a follow-up to the Post, THE END DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS, to point out that any Organization, which has to resort to
activities such as sponsoring and/or condoning blatantly unethical activities
such as described here and in HOW TO IMPLEMENT IDENTITY THEFT AND LEGITIMIZE FRAUD, as well as THE UNDERLYING REASON WHY BETTER EXAMPLES ARE SO DIFFICULT
TO BE REALIZED and VIRTUALS AND THEIR SELECTION OF LABELS AND NUMBERS; then this does not say a great deal for the business model and/or
investment methods of these individuals/organizations for generating income
legitimately. For such THE...END...DOES...JUSTIFY...THE...MEANS..., as long as those pof their cause are the only individua;s "left standing" a nd none are able to
tell that an "operation replacement" has taken place as documented in the posts WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLMNTED BY DECREE - UPDATED as well as PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE - EDITED AND UPDATED,
even if those involved are “selling out” their country along the way, in a modern day version
of "IDENTITY THEFT A LA MODE".
5 comments:
What else can you expect from those "virtuals" Supporters, that would do anything for notority up to an including staging his own kidnapping (in the trunk of a vehicle)?
If any of the Entities/Associates identified in this Post have also to resort to misleding ANYONE/ENTITY about the "true" Ownership of this Proprietorship as documented in this link (shown on COMMENTS Page); then this is also an indication that such individuals are devoid of innovation and legitimate business/investment skills and such conduct should not be a surprise coming from ethically challenged individuals regardless of their size & status (as documented on the Conservery Proprietorship's Page on this Blog). There is an unofficial name for such action, plain old-fashioned "thugism" - 21st century style.
I wonder if there is any connection between the Central figure identified here, the massive investment scheme in Citybank on the part of his investment arm just prior to the financial crisis, the fact that this is the same Financial Institution used by the school of my attendance - Pratt Institute, and its subsequent financial demise, which it is still attempting to recover from (especially since it had to rely on GOVERNMENT STRINGS ATTACHED BAIL OUT AID), to return to stability? As previously stated, the investment skills of such individuals leave much to be desired!
They are those who use the underlying circumstances of confusion, no matter how it is brought about (or maniuplated - whether financial/mass tragedy, etc.) to bring about qualifications for "virtual" impostors, (see the posts THE UNDERLYING REASON WHY BETTER EXAMPLES ARE SO DIFFICULT TO BE REALIZED and COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - UPDATED, link on COMMENTS Page), in exchange for financial gain (of one type or another, by whatever means these frauds are able to generate income under the guise of their "new found" identities, with their lack of meaningful skills). Someone who is able to spurge on multi-million dollar properties is making a "killing" off these "virtuals". on CAN MY INVESTMENTS STAND UP TO INTENSE SCRUTINY?
When a “Society’s” Titan is busily investing large sums in various institutions, such as occurred “coincidentally” just prior to the financial crisis, you can never tell what is real objectives of this investment, such as this Titan did with Citibank. When this specific “Society’s” Titan and others steadfastly maintain that their “Society’s” types are “legitimate” you have to ask how can they know this for certain to be so adamant. Consider the following: After relocating to the temporary address in New York after leaving VT on January 1, 1991, I worked for the temporary employment agency Career Blazers from February 19, 1991 until the time of the opening of the position at IELP in IA in June (see the below photos of applicable Pay Stubs - on COMMENTS Page). Through this very helpful Nassau county office of this Temp Agency where I applied, I was placed at the Citibank office on Bayliss Rd, Melville, NY for this entire duration (where account details were entered into computer systems and then balanced to ensure accuracy), such that they even held a going away party for me after informing them of my landing the Engineering position at the nuclear plant in IA. The below W2 forms (depicted on COMMENTS Page) were received for my employment there, in early 1992, with the first containing my temporary NY address and the second a semblance of the 1st address resided at after relocating to IA at the “Cedarwood Hills” Glass Road apartments. Of note is the fact that the second W2, an attempt at identity mangling was carried as it contains an altered SS# since my normal SS#, this W2 sent in this manner (because, I am concluding since the final paycheck received when at the new IA address, but it did not contain the IA address, ONLY the W2 form had been prepared in this manner). Therefore, I am concluding that in attempting to cover-up my work stint at Citibank’s Melville office on Bayliss road and assign it to some individual from IA, the “Society’s” networking abilities were at play even though I was unaware of it at the time because my taxes were filed with this W2, without realizing it at the time). Isn’t it “amazing” what quid pro quo deal-making can lead to by those “Opportunistic” and Titan types, therefore when they are steadfastly maintaining that their “Society’s” types are “legitimate” and invest their funds in great amounts in “targeted” organizations, it is never known for certain the “real” reasons for their infusions of funding and whether or not cover-up is the intended purpose; especially since Citibank also happens to be the financial institution of my school, Pratt Institute. Can the investments of these “society’s” types really stand up to intense scrutiny as previously inquired? The answer “lies” in the alteration of SS#s “after the fact”, the sale of office buildings, the rental of the 140,000 square feet of office space and their “possible” connection to this address here at 8263 140th Ave, Olin IA. It begs the question, how do they know with such certainty that their “Society’s” types are “legitimate”? The answer is, if they have been provided with altered records such as the type shown in made-up SS# record used on the W2, intended to defraud an individual and “legitimize” frauds (who are in turn claimed as originals), that’s why they can so adamant in their knowledge.
Post a Comment