Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

CONSERVERY FINAL STATUS UPDATE REGARDING STATE CRITERION

FINAL CONSERVERY STATE UPDATE

The final part of the annual State Tax/Use Permit was mailed back today as indicated below and there is NO remaining Conservery criterion to complete the State process at this address (8263 140th Ave, Olin, IA 52320-7708) (copy as mailed shown below).

Conservery Final Biz - Tax/Use Permit From Current Address As Mailed 1/18/2012 Showing Mailing Envelope With Contents - Copy of Biz Cancellation Form Also Included As Indicated on Tax/Use Form.

UPDATE
As previously stated, the Form requesting permanent cancellation of Permit # 1-53-006707 was mailed as indicated here and in addition, telephone service was requested to be disconnected as of 2/1/2012 as shown below.

CONSERVERY STATUS

Biz Permit Cancellation Request Mailing

Request for Telephone Service Cancellation as of 2/1/2012, HOWEVER, CONTRARY TO THIS REQUEST, MY NAME WAS REMOVED FROM THE ACCOUNT AND THE SAME NUMBER KEPT AT THIS RESIDENCE EVEN THOUGH THIS IS CONTRARY TO THE TYPICAL PRACTICE OF ASSIGNING/REASSIGNING NUMBERS. PLEASE NOTE, THIS RETENTION IS IN NOW WAY CONNECTED TO THE PROPRIETORSHIP'S ACTIVITIES INITIATED BY THOSE "SOCIETY'S" TYPES WHO RELY ON THE ASSIGNING OF "HOLLOW" NAME IDENTITY CRUTCH AND INFRINGING ON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS FOR "LEGITIMACY" & ARE KNOWN BY SUCH TERMS AS MOGULS, TITANS AND ARBITERS. IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO HIGHLY UNETHICAL PRACTIES FOR PERPETUAL WEALTH GENERATION, WHAT TYPE OF MOGUL ARE YOU REALLY? SEE THE COMM ENTS # 1 FROM 11/23/2012 AND # 2 FROM 11/21/2012 BY ACCESSING THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS LINK ON THE COMMENTS 1 PAGE AS WELL AS THE ASSOCIATED POST STRATEGIC NUMBERS AND LABELS  - THE FINALE 

3 comments:

J_F_Brazant said...

Contrary to what was requested here, the Telephone Company only removed my name from this billing and kept the existing number. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PHONE NUMBER IS IN NO WAY CONNECTED TO MY PROPRIETORSHIP.

J_F_Brazant said...

There is currently a mini emergency here at 8263 140th Ave, Olin, IA 52320 with the mysterious failure of the water supply to the residence at approximately 10:00 pm on 5/18/2012. A Plumbing repairperson was contacted around 6:00 am (see photo included on COMMENTS Page), who indicated that he would be here in an hour, approximately 1 hour ago. The details of this unfolding story will be updated here as appropriate.

J_F_Brazant said...

The repairs to the water supply were completed by 9:00 am earlier today as it did not take him significant time to carry out them out as they “appear to be routine” in older type rural water systems with underground cisterns. The repairman, Mike, took the old MCC (Motor Control Center) with him, similar to the example shown below (on the COMMENTS Page), (instead of ½ hp, the MCC removed due to failure was ¾ hp). I have seen enough of these “coincidental” type failures over the years at the most inopportune times, (such as immediately after a blizzard circa 1993 when I had to travel to Florida for a Utility conference business trip and on other occasions), that I did not need additional JUNK being stored, therefore, I did not see any reason to request that he leave it. However, they are those who are of the opinion that absconding with a “coincidentally” failed MCC, removing the money order (MO), which my son typically pays with when the bill is received and mailed (as these “virtual” types have no regard for ethical processes, because their Gatekeepers have trained them to believe that they can carry out anything regardless of how “sinister”, and it will be covered up politically); then replacing the MO with a check paid from their fictitious accounts, and somehow this "magically" justifies the stolen State of Iowa Income tax refund check, needed by them (and their Gatekeepers) for demonstrating legitimacy. Now if indeed, anyone emerges attempting to use the payment for a replacement MCC from their fictitious account as a demonstration of authenticity, then, this will be a clear indication that this “typically” occurring “coincidental” failure of the MCC is indeed questionable. Finally, whenever the billing for the replacement MCC is received, it will be noted here.