This is an update to the previous post UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES RULE THE DAY in the interest of accuracy after conducting
additional research to ensure that a more completed picture was being viewed of
the circumstances surrounding the example 2 used regarding the delivery giants
with names that sounds like Phextes and Youpzs, and what was realized was that
this entity’s (Phextes) Founder and CEO guards the position of the Company he
founded in 1971 with much passion. Furthermore, there is an ongoing and
long-standing rivalry between these two nemeses. Therefore, this Entity’s
position has to be viewed in this light because of the intense competitive
nature of their business. For example, when the Phextex CEO announced in July
2010 that his organization had purchased new transportation equipment, which in
his opinion would be a “game changer” in the competition with his archrival
Youpzs in the Asian delivery and pickup route. Youpzs immediately responded
that they did not believe the new equipment would a game changer of any type
and even if such was the case, they had the means necessary to adjust their own
network to neutralize any competitive advantage even if any such were to occur.
The Founder finished his announcement as reported in that popular daily/weekend
Business Publication from July 14, 2010 by pointing out that “the secret of
this business is you’ve got to have a defensive strategy, as well as an
offensive strategy.” Therefore, in conclusion, it is being pointed out that the actions
of both Phextes as well as Youpzs have to be viewed in the light of these highly
competitive circumstances.
1 comment:
This amendment of the previous post does not indicate that this Blog is in favor of the lawsuit tactics of various entities as documented. This update was carried out to provide background about the industry for the record and the methods employed by either delivery package “giant” to refrain from the appearance of taking one specific side over the other. This Blog still does not support the use of lawsuit tactics (as documented) just as it does not support other corporate tactics that allow corporations to act as entitled dictatorial entities (with a “voice”), such as over voting.
Post a Comment