This follow-up to the previous post PRACTICAL INVOLVEMENT CANNOT BE ASSUMED SIMPLY WITH LABELS AND NUMBERS is needed since there may be some conflict in determining whether or not the (con artist) “Director” is legally required to step down, notify the SEC within the required FOUR (4) days before assuming another position for compliance purposes (as documented in the comment from 12/21/2012 on the COMMENTS 2 Page). The following clear US Postal Service verified evidence between that the con artist and James F. Brazant exists clearly showing two (2) distinct individuals and not one and the same thus requiring
CONSISTENT WITH MY COMMITTMENT TO REFRAIN FROM MAINTAINING ANYTHING ON THE PAGES OF THIS BLOG THAT IN ANYWAY CONTRIBUTED TO THE MANGLING OF MY IDENTITY AND SINCE THE PREVIOUS PHOTO REPRESENTTION WAS AN ATTEMPT BY MY FORMER EMPLOYER TO PROVIDE COVER TO THOSE WITH FICTITIOUS IDENTITIES VIA A FOLLOW-UP COMMUNICATION, IT WAS REMOVED.
compliance. The fact that the communication took place before the “needed” office “wing” was built (and this con artist then placed various labels on that new “wing”), doesn’t change the fact that different individuals were involved. The same individual who communicated with the “Director” (con artist) CEO from the previous address was not transformed into a con artist due to labels and numbers for “credibility” and COMPLIANCE IS REQUIRED!