HOW SHOULD AN INDIVIDUAL HANDLE THE "EXPORTING" OF HIS IDENTITY/RECORDS FROM THE COUNTRY OF HIS BIRTH TO ANOTHER FOR DEAL-MAKING?

What would you do if after having written various forms of communication to the Country of your birth (as depicted below), you were faced with a not-so-subtle response implying that your identity had been “Exported” to another Country to provide cover for a con artist as a result of quid quo pro deal-making? See the below symbolic response from the quasi government

 

Agency, in effect leaving you Stateless. The response is quite telling in its symbolism since it documents a date on, which no communication of this nature had been sent. I can only conclude after the ensuing developments and duration that it implied that my records on, which my school financing was based were "Exported" (see the post AN EXAMPLE OF HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTITY TRANSFER). How else can this communication be interpreted except that my Central Bank approval was “Exported” to the USA for the cause of a con artist using the numbers 33 for his “borrowed legitimacy”. All the numbers in the carefully “Exported” letter point to such a development, as follows:

• the January referenced month used , (the approval was dated 1/13/1978),
• the number 27 used (since the central bank approval was the 27^th such for that year),
• the carefully used referenced number of 2-13-21, (which includes the use of the date that the approval was issued on),
• finally, the used of 21 implies that the State of Illinois is in some way connected to the switching of records that took place (see the below photo).

 

There isn’t a politician anywhere who can validate such developments/undertakings, even one moved specifically to the District for such a “cause as this” (see the below photo inserts). The exporting” of an individual’s “identity/records” by one Country to those willing to “pay” for

 

such is willfully illegal, jokingly unethical and chronically vulgar and is intended to be a clever form of indentured service by modern day “Society’s” type “colonial mas’ers”, which has ZERO PLACE IN SUPPOSEDLY TWENTY-FIRST (21^ST) CENTURY INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONVENTIONS.