It is very difficult to demonstrate consistency, but my convictions were included in my Proprietorship’s procedures for a reason, namely to offer/provide services without the appearance of conflicts, which in a “nutshell” translates to TRANSPARENCY and this is not easy to accomplish in today’s environment, where conflicts-of-interest are everywhere. The Conservery procedures regarding political affiliations (or even the appearance of anything that could convey support of one political side over the other has not been strictly adhered to by me). The Procedures were developed as they were for the purpose of conveying independence particularly for my unique immigration status and appropriate steps have been and will be taken to ensure that my actions no longer convey this.
4 comments:
I have taken actions consistent with the information documented here as stated. How can I realistically comment on transparency or lack of encountered, if I do not start with myself? Stay tuned!
I had to finish what I started & corrected some areas in, which I had gone too far from my Proprietorship's Gudelines; & though they were very difficult & painful decisions to make they had to be done in order that my Proprietorship's status remains unquestioned. This matter of Identity Duplicity that I have been faced with, which some have taken upon themselves to give to otherts at my expense is relatively simple to resolve for transparency purposes. I will grant that NONE OF THOSE OSTENSIBLY HIDING WITH THEIR EASILY OBTAINED IDENTITIES, ESPECIALLY THE PROTECTED "IDENTITY DODGER" HIDING & HIS ENTOURAGE OF BRAZANT'S CANNOT APPEAR ANYWHERE & SIGN A DOCUMENT AS James F. Brazant, together IN MY PRESENCE. THIS ENTOURAGE CAN HIDE, USE THEIR "STAMPS" WITH THEIR FAKE SIGNATURES & MAINTAIN THEIR FALSE IDENTITIES WITH THE SUPPORT/ASSISTANCE OF THOSE ENTITIES WHO ACT AS IF THEIR VERY EXISTENCE, DEPENDS ON PROTECTING THESE IMPOSTERS. WHY IT IS AS, IN ONE SPECIFIC CASE, THE VERY COMPANY WAS SAVED FROM BANKRUPTCY, (MAYBE WITH THE HELP OF QUESTIONABLE FUNDS, & SINCE THESE EVENTS OCCURRED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE DEMISE OF ONE WELL-KNOWN PONSY SCHEMER'S DEMISE, WHOSE FUNDS HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND; IT CAN NEVER BE CERTAIN WHERE THE FUNDS ORIGINATED, BUT IT WOULD EXPLAIN THE ALMOST "DRIVEN" LENGHTS/MANNER IN, WHICH THIS ORGANIZATION GOES TOO, TO PROTECT IMPOSTERS, COULD BE DUE TO GRATITUDE ON AN UNIMAGINABLE ($$$$$$$$$$$) SCALE!
Transparency is a very difficult thing to practice consistently, that is why individuals, entities, etc. go to great lengths to attempt to cover-up areas where mistakes, wrongs or personal failings occurred as appropriate. For the individual who thinks that the events associated with a certain arrangement that took place are a secret, that is NOT the case because awareness of what occurred is known. When faced with a dilema with regards to her (or his) own personal failing, the individual engaged in a certain identity switching transaction in exchange for keeping her (or his) “failing” a secret. The only problem here is that it was my identity that was sacrificed in exchanged for giving imposters legitimacy. Quite unexpectedly in life sometimes when “wishes” are expressed in life, the opportunity comes unexpectedly to enable reconciliation of a past mistake but choosing the easy way out (or “weakness at the knees”), takes precedence & the chance to make a paradigm shift of sorts is lost. On the other hand, when confronted with my own lapse in procedureal compliance, the very difficult decision was made publicly to correct all those areas where I was less than transparent. I hope that if only one individual examine my example & takes action in response, then my effort would have been worthwhile but I am not expecting it to occur because it is easier to do the opposite & most individuals do not have the courage to do what’s needed epecially when my own family didn’t; it is just hoped that those who actually brought about these circumstances succeed, then the reminder of what was done would no longer be visible (me). I too am a product of my experiences & I have to physically see to believe & I do not see any scenario how it can be accomplished without requiring me take some risk that I am no longer prepared to make.
Thoughts Concerning Consistency
After the realization of my own procedural lapse,
I will not blatantly proceed to wear such caps.
Should such action appear to have occurred,
Jeopardizing one previously assured;
Take time to determine if it was my activity,
That placed myself in such captivity.
Post a Comment