COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - UPDATED/REVISED

This posting is being expanded to include the events surrounding the current financial crisis and other events considered noteworthy. This monthly theme for February’s Conservery calendar series was highlighted because there is a definite difference between the two even though subtle on occasion, but clearly recognizable, when naturally occurring developments take place compared to orchestrated enactments. The following selected descriptions should provide some additional clarity:

• The current financial crisis with its well-timed “meltdown” that peaked during the 2008 presidential primary/election contests cycle would in my estimation be considered an other event for its timing concurrent with the previously mention contests. My reasons for drawing this conclusion are as follows: All those with knowledge of investment, banking and insurance tools/practices were well aware that 1) Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) were as sound an investment mechanism as was the investment“frenzy” surrounding the “dot.com” bubble of the 1990s. This fact is based on the principle that you cannot guarantee large institutions they will all be insured against losses should the large portfolios of subprime mortgages in their possession collapse. In effect, the largest such insurer and others to a lesser extent, did not have the financial mechanism to meet their insured obligations that all became due at the same time and a “bailout” was required. This is in reality what took place. These “bailout’ funds were then used to payout to the large institutions with the “foresight” to purchase such insurance against losses in the subprime market, their claims against the“crippled” insurer. 2) Once Lehman Brothers brokerage was allowed to fail even though other institutions such as Bear Sterns and others were “propped-up”, the domino effect that “just so happened to land” in the midst of the 2008 election cycle was an event waiting to occur. The question of the day is, did this “well known” calamity waiting to happen change the outcome of the 2008 election? MY OPINION IS PROBABLY, BUT THEN AGAIN, I AM ONLY AN “ON-THE-SIDELINES OBSERVER”.
• Why does it appear as if musical mailing locations are the order of the day with the Federal Tax Returns filing locations that switch between St. Louis, MO and Fresno, CA for Iowa filers? All the years I worked at the Palo plant here in IA and even after, the filing location has always been St. Louis, MO. However, those years when I am unable to file due to the set criteria, the filing location seem to be in Fresno, CA as it was last year 2011 for 2010 Tax Returns. This year, the filing location is switched back to St. Louis, MO from CA (see below). Since

Federal Tax Returns Envelope Containing 1040 Form - 2 Pages, Schedule C,1099R Forms from Alliant/Wells Fargo - (2) and Form 8829, For 2011 Returns Mailed Today 2/11/2012

• these changes are mandated, with the high bar set for classifying coincidences, the routine switching of the Tax Filing locations between St. Louis and Fresno, CA are being considered other events.

True coincidences are rear developments and I do not have many examples I care to share in this context, except as previously stated (see COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - UPDATED) so it make no sense why the tax filing location is routinely switched, which seem to coincide with filing versus non-filing years.
These occurrences as described in the linked posting are examples of“real” coincidences in a society when too many events are orchestrated (pseudo) events to provide legitimacy for “virtual” impostors. COULD IT BE THAT THESE "ROUTINE" TAX FILING LOCATION CHANGES ARE PERHAPS AIDING "VIRTUAL" IMPOSTORS IN ABSCONDING WITH THEIR ILL-GOTTEN GAINS AND "LEGITIMATELY" FILING RETURNS IN THEIR FICTITIOUS IDENTITIES WITH THE SUPPORT OF ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS MANTA (see below)?



Above is a clear example of fraud being condoned by questionable entities who blatantly disregard repeated requests while permitting impostors to utilize resources giving the appearance as if connected to my Proprietorship and sending the emailing to my email address to give the air of legitimacy. CONTRARY TO THE INFORMATION IN THE EMAIL COMMUNICATION, THIS "PROFILE" AT MANTA HAS NEVER BEEN WANTED, CLAIMED, CONDONED OR UPDATED BY THE LEGITIMATE OWNERSHIP OF CONSERVERY. MY TAX RETURNS MAILED TODAY FOR MYSELF/CONSERVERY "TO THE LOCATION FOR NON IMPOSTORS" WILL ATTEST TO THIS.