ELECTRONIC RECORDS FRAUD AND LEGITIMACY

This is a Supplement to the post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE to serve the purpose of reminding those that rely on stealing records for legitimacy that this is an unsustainable course. For example, my daughter Danielle, called the home residence on three (3) occasions today, first at 8:43 am, the second was around 4:00 pm and finally at 7:41 pm, (see photos) when I discussed

Danielle's Calls in-part of 3/31/2012

with her at length, various details about her stay at her current rehabilitation center, as I had with the Facility’s Representative at the time of admission, her medical and vehicle insurance-related details, (which she should not yet be focusing on). However, by the time I got around to recording the approximate 4:00 pm call around the time of the last call, all the earlier calls had been wiped clean from the phone and only replaced with the last call at 7:41 pm. LET ME TAKE THE TIME TO REMIND THOSE WHO THINK THAT STEALING ELECTRONIC RECORDS FROM THE LAND-LINE PHONE AS PROOF OF THEIR CONNECTION TO THIS RESIDENCE AHEAD OF THE DIVORCE HEARING, (REGARDLESS OF WHOM OR WHICH ENTITY IS PROVIDING BACKING FOR SUCH ACTIVITIES); THINK AGAIN, YOUR DECEPTION ENDS HERE!

PROPERTY UPDATE DETAIL

As previously stated in CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION SELECTION/EXCLUSION - UPDATED; this process is closed and I have about as much interest in California via this deceptively addressed UNSOLICITED mailing from California Outdoor Properties, (see photo below) previously closed as a potential relocation

Unsolicited Mailing Received From the Indicated Organization on 3/31/2012

destination in 2011, as I have in reopening my AOL email account, now also PERMANENTLY closed approximately 90-days ago.

ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT DETAILS AND COMPLIANCE - UPDATED

I received this Notice of Violation (NOV) in the mail today, which is being updated in this post to include time clarification details for an event that is

Notice of Violation (NOV) from 3/17/2012 Received 3/29/2012 and Miscellaneous Details

supposed to have occurred on 3/17/2012 around 4:23 pm (see included photo above). This Notice on the right # 01110284766 indicates that I was traveling at 69 mph while returning from visiting Danielle in the Hospital in Iowa City on the indicated date. The timing is very important, because I stopped to have the vehicle serviced in the local establishment (see MISNUMBERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS), when the time was documented as 3:37 pm and this is the approximate time when I stopped for service since the parking lot receipt (above photo, lower right) documents my leaving at 3:22 pm, after, which I stopped 15 minutes later for the service. After spending around twenty (20) minutes there, I left the establishment around 4:00 pm. Due to the events that took place with the documenting of the questionable mileage/Odometer reading, the photo above right was taken on my arrival at my current Olin, IA residence around 5:17 pm (the camera setting had not yet been adjusted for DST).

On I380 between Cedar Rapids and Iowa City the maximum speed of 70 mph is permitted and on entering the Cedar Rapids city limits, maximum speeds of 55 mph resume. Between Iowa City and my Olin, IA residence is approximately 70 miles. If the NOV is taken into consideration, this would indicate that speeds consistent with the 70 mph would have been traveled even after the 70 mph limit ended, which would have placed me in Olin, in an hour (or around 5:00 pm). However, the 5:17 pm arrival time is an indication that slower speeds were traveled than the constant 70 mph suggested in the NOV (as no other stops were made). SINCE NONE OF THIS, IS WORTH THE EXPENDITURE OF TIME NEEDED TO BE INVESTED TO CONTEST, I WILL PAY THE VIOLATION, IN ORDER THAT DANIELLE’S ACCIDENT REPORT [WHICH IS DUE TO BE ISSUED NEXT WEEK, (the week of 4/1/2012)], WILL BE FREE OF ANY CONSTRAINTS THAT WILL STAND IN THE WAY OF OFFERING A CRITICAL REVIEW IF SUCH IS WARRANTED.

ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT DETAILS AND COMPLIANCE

I received this Notice of Violation (NOV) in the mail today for an event that is supposed to have occurred on 3/17/2012 around 4:23 pm (see included

Notice of Violation (NOV) from 3/17/2012 Recieved 3/29/2012

photo above). This Notice # 01110284766 on the left above indicates that I was traveling at 69 mph while returning from visiting Danielle in the Hospital in Iowa City on the indicated date. The timing is very important, because I stopped to have the vehicle serviced in the local establishment (see MISNUMBERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS), when the time was documented as 3:37 pm and I am going to assume that the time as documented is when I stopped for service and not when the receipt was actually written up (closer to exiting). If the time shown is the latter this would be an indication of the approximate time when my service was completed. However, assuming that the time shown is when I stopped for service, and then spending around twenty (20) minutes there would have me exiting the establishment around 4:00 pm instead of approximately 3:40 pm. Due to the events that took place with the documenting of the questionable mileage/Odometer reading, the photo above right was taken on my arrival at my current Olin, IA residence around 5:17 pm (shown in lower right as the camera setting had not yet been adjusted for DST).

On I380 between Cedar Rapids and Iowa City the maximum speed of 70 mph is permitted and on entering the Cedar Rapids city limits, maximum speeds of 55 mph resume. Between Iowa City and my Olin, IA residence is approximately 70 miles. If the NOV is taken into consideration, this would indicate that speeds consistent with the 70 mph would have been traveled even after the 70 mph limit ended, which would have placed me in Olin, in an hour (or around 5:00 pm). However, the 5:17 pm arrival time is an indication that slower speeds were traveled than the constant 70 mph suggested in the NOV. Furthermore, if the time shown on the receipt was the time when the receipt was written up, making my exit from the establishment closer to 3:40 pm then, even much slower speeds would have been traveled in arriving at my Olin residence (as no other stops were made). SINCE I CANNOT PROVE ANY OF THIS, I WILL PAY THE VIOLATION, IN ORDER THAT WHEN DANIELLE’S ACCIDENT REPORT IS ISSUED NEXT WEEK, (the week of 4/1/2012), THERE WILL BE NO CONSTRAINTS STANDING IN THE WAY OF OFFERING A CRITICAL REVIEW IF SUCH IS WARRANTED.

CHANGE – A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE

When the Conservery-related video introduced the topic “Change Is On The Way”, what really is the type of change that was being introduced, and how will it be recognized, if at all? This post will examine this subject in greater detail, from one perspective, as follows:

C stands for CONSISTENTLY

H stands for HIGHLY

A stands for ABSOLUTELY

N stands for NARROWLY

G stands for GENERALLY, and

E stands for EARLY

Taking this approach into consideration, what is being conveyed is a type of change (or transformation), which will be CONSISTENTLY, applied, to HIGHLY, and ABSOLUTELY, NARROWLY focused criteria, such that EARLY identification will GENERALLY be possible. This group that comprises change is not possible in the absence of consistency, which is why it is the first and most important of the listed criteria in the group. As a result, the change, which the video discusses, is neither simplistically rhetorical nor is it broad in its focus, because expansive transformations are typically impossible to sustain. However, a NARROWLY focused transformation, (for ex in doing business), if CONSISTENTLY applied can be HIGHLY “addictive”, EARLY on, GENERALLY, if ABSOLUTELY centered on its target area.

Finally, IT IS FOR THIS REASON THAT CONSERVERY’S SERVICE OFFERING WILL ALWAYS BE TO SELECT INDIVIDUALS/ENTITIES ONLY (as advertised - see Conservery Header below),

Conservery carefully worded Header

because not all are conducive to change that can then be implemented to either assist others once the candidate becomes an office-holder or alter business methods in the case of an entity, as appropriate.

CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION SELECTION/EXCLUSION - UPDATE

Please note that this process is over. I HAVE A VERY CLEAR IDEA OF THE DIRECTION TO PROCEED ALONG and to avoid mistakenly assisting those directly or indirectly responsible for Danielle’s condition, no other locations are being reviewed in this regard. Anyway, I have no respect for those who have to sneak and try to manipulate others into carrying out their ill-fated schemes simply because some entities with vast resources (and zero respect for the rights of individuals), can cleverly conceal themselves like Chameleons, get away with anything and not have to face consequences, after leaving trails of "accidents" in their wake.  

ANY ADDITIONAL DIRECTION DETAILS WILL BE ANNOUNCED AS APPROPRIATE IF NEEDED.

James F. Brazant

Office Manager/Founder
Conservery

MISSING INCOME TAX REFUND UPDATED

This post was updated to include information about the Real Estate property taxes, which were paid today (3/23/2012).
My Federal Income Tax Return was filed/mailed in 2/11/2012 (see COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS UPDATED/REVSIED), and at that time, a check was made on the IRS Site and it correctly indicated that response to paper returns should be expected approximately six (6) weeks after mailing, and this was the typical date responses have been obtained/received by me.

Approximately three (3) weeks after my returns were filed, my daughter Danielle suffered an unexplainable debilitating traumatic brain injury (TBI) "accident" on 3/4/2012. On 3/20/2012, the Officer in charge of the investigation called me to inquire about Danielle’s status (see photo below) and I took the time to inquire about the status of his Report, to, which he replied that it was almost completed and would be issued after his return from vacation the week of 3/25/2012; making the Report issue date, due during the first week of April.

Call received from Police Officer in charge of competing Danielle's "accident" investigation

The six-week duration for receipt of my tax return refund is due this week the week of 3/22/2012). My son Dejon, who filed a paper return, (but on the week of 2/19/2012, received his refund on an efficient four (4) week turn around, during the week of 3/11/2012. I am unsure of Danielle’s Tax filing action prior to her unfortunate“accident”, but I am aware that she was an electronic filer.

Since, there are some identity thieves who have no ethical standards, this post is being issued to serve as a reminder that, staging debilitating “accidents” as a diversion in an effort to divert federal tax returns is not just one but multiple felonies. For the record, let me state it again: 1) staging an accident that no one in the Cedar Rapids Police Department wants responsibility for completing the report (since they either currently are or very soon will be three (3) Police Captains in charge of the Department on a rotating basis), is a FELONY (attempted murder), 2) diverting mail intended for one individual and making it available to an identity thief is a FELONY, for mail fraud and another FELONY for the depositing of these funds in an illegally obtained account. There are at least three (3) FELONIES so far and if further review is carried out more could be found. The taxes filed by me and the expected refund is to be delivered to me, THE RESIDENT/OWNER OF 8263 140^th AVE, OLIN, IA FOR THE PAST TWENTY YEARS (see included copy of current Real Estate Tax payment below, which the Owners of the #37 Playbook may have been busy with - note money number 19637 - selected by the Institution).

Copy of the ACTUAL Money Order's Non Negotiable page for payment of real estate property taxes for March 2012, for 8263 14th Ave, Olin, IA, (which my son Dejon, whose name can be see in the Non Negotiable area of the money order, took care of) with his Mother actually delivering it (and inserting her name) to the Treasurer's Office

Please do not add more felonies to maintain an unsustainable cover-up of international proportions, with the trail of individuals considered inconsequential growing by leaps and bounds. [EX. 1) Edith, my brother’s original wife whose end in Barbados (West indies) remains clouded; 2) one noted fashion designer in London, a dresser of the elite, died by hanging under suspicious circumstances; 3), Damien, my sister June’s only son, death by “accidental”drowning (in Barbados, West indies), in late 2011 and 4) Danielle, TBI due to an unexplainable “accident” and there may be others I am not aware of.]

MISSING INCOME TAX REFUND

My Federal Income Tax Return was filed/mailed in 2/11/2012 (see COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS UPDATED/REVSIED), and at that time, a check was made on the IRS Site and it correctly indicated that response to paper returns should be expected approximately six (6) weeks after mailing, and this was the typical date responses have been obtained/received by me.

Approximately three (3) weeks after my returns were filed, my daughter Danielle suffered an unexplainable debilitating traumatic brain injury (TBI) "accident" on 3/4/2012. On 3/20/2012, the Officer in charge of the investigation called me to inquire about Danielle’s status (see photo below) and I took the time to inquire about the status of his Report, to, which he replied that it was almost completed and would be issued after his return from vacation the week of 3/25/2012; making the Report issue date, due during the first week of April.

Call received from Police Officer in charge of competing Danielle's "accident" investigation

The six-week duration for receipt of my tax return refund is due this week the week of 3/22/2012). My son Dejon, who filed a paper return, (but on the week of 2/19/2012, received his refund on an efficient four (4) week turn around, during the week of 3/11/2012. I am unsure of Danielle’s Tax filing action prior to her unfortunate “accident”, but I am aware that she was an electronic filer.

Since, there are some identity thieves who have no ethical standards, this post is being issued to serve as a reminder that, staging debilitating “accidents” as a diversion in an effort to divert federal tax returns is not just one but multiple felonies. For the record, let me state it again: 1) staging an accident that no one in the Cedar Rapids Police Department wants responsibility for completing the report (since they either currently are or very soon will be three (3) Police Captains in charge of the Department on a rotating basis), is a FELONY (attempted murder), 2) diverting mail intended for one individual and making it available to an identity thief is a FELONY, for mail fraud and another FELONY for the depositing of these funds in an illegally obtained account. There are at least three (3) FELONIES so far and if further review is carried out more could be found. The taxes filed by me and the expected refund is to be delivered to me, THE RESIDENT/OWNER OF 8263 140^th AVE, OLIN, IA FOR THE PAST TWENTY YEARS. Please do not add more felonies to maintain an unsustainable cover-up of international proportions, with the trail of individuals considered inconsequential growing by leaps and bounds. [EX. 1)  Edith, my brother’s original wife whose end in Barbados (West indies) remains clouded; 2) one noted fashion designer in London, a dresser of the elite, died by hanging under suspicious circumstances; 3), Damien, my sister June’s only son, death by “accidental”drowning (in Barbados, West indies), in late 2011 and 4) Danielle, TBI due to an unexplainable “accident” and there may be others I am not aware of.]

MISNUMBERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

WHILE IN IOWA CITY ON (3/17/2012) AFTER VISITING WITH MY DAUGHTER AT THE HOSPITAL, I DROPPED BY THE LOCAL VEHICLE SERVICE ENTITY AS SHOWN BELOW. BEFORE PROCEEDING, I WANT TO THANK THOSE WHO TOOK THE TIME TO SERVICE THE VEHICLE. EVEN THOUGH THE WORKERS APPEARED TO BE “DILIGENT”, THEY APPARENTLY HAVE DEFICIENCIES WHEN IT COMES TO DOCUMENTING NUMBERS WITHIN CLOSE APPROXIMATION TO THE REQUIRED ACCURACY. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ODOMETER MILEAGE READING WAS RECORDED AS 137,219 MILES, WHEN THIS WAS CLEARLY NOT THE CASE, AS SHOWN IN THE PHOTOS OF THE

Invoice for Service Completed on 3/17/2012 with Actual Odometer Reading

ACTUAL ODOMETER READING (TAKEN AN HOUR AFTER THE WORK WAS COMPLETED). IN ADDITION, MY ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER DETAILS WERE RECORDED AS 170^TH INSTEAD OF 140TH AVENUE AND THE CRITICAL IDENTIFIER PART OF MY PHONE NUMBER WAS RECORDED AS 593 INSTEAD OF 531. NOW AM I TO CONCLUDE THAT THESE WERE DELIBERATE ACTIONS? (SEE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY'S "VIRTUAL" SOCIETY  AND WHO ARE THE REAL OWNERS OF THE NO. 37 "VIRTUAL" PLAYBOOK?).

“ROUTINE” OCCURING TWISTS AND TURNS

When mentioning "Twists And Turns" included in the above subject in a posting on one of the pages on this Applications Page on this Blog on 3/15/2012; it was intended to be a literal interpretation (see Post about "Feelings and Lonliness"). For example, on Monday, 3/13/2012 prior to visiting with Danielle, a stop was made at the Local tire repair facility, (see insert below), to repair a bearing
  

Receipt of work completed on Bearing

Replacement of 3/12/2012

Vehicle on which work was carried out,
included here for reference purposes only 

assembly on the rear driver’s side of the vehicle that had become unbearably noisy (the tire itself had only been installed a few days earlier). I am neither a believer in coincidences (nor "Bi Professional Superstition"), (see COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - UPDATED); nevertheless FACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS, cannot be ignored. 

However, on my way to visit Danielle again on 3/15/2012, while on the Highway near the Eastern Iowa Airport Exit, the tire on the rear passenger side of the vehicle simply ruptured (for unknown reasons). After, replacing the ruptured tire with the Spare on the shoulder of the Highway, I exited it, found the nearest facility and replaced the tire (see below insert), before continuing

Receipt for work completed on Tire Replcement of 3/15/2012

on my way to visit with Danielle. IT IS DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS THESE THAT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DIVERT FROM FOCUSED OBJECTIVES, whether coincidences or “other events.”

FACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS UPDATED

This update of the post FACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS was done to include the below actual copies of the photo pages from Dejon’s and Danielle’s passports only. The numbers are very close sequentially and Dawn’s should be easily found out. 

Updated Passport Photo for Danielle

Dawn's Passport envelop and Photo from 2001

Updated Passport Photo for Dejon

FACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS

This update serves to remind those who think that "sponsoring" events such as those identified in the post TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF REASONS FOR EXCLUDING LOCATION(S) FROM CONSIDERATION, using their proxies; that actual historical facts will always trump staged activities intent on altering history to prop up “virtuals” and their supporters. For those who do not follow this line of thought, the details included will offset any misinformation circulating about the events surrounding the January/February 2001 trip to Trinidad (and hopefully those about the events surrounding Danielle "accident" of 3/4/2012, and specifically THOSE WHO APPEAR TO BE BENEFITING FROM HER CURRENT STATUS).
Please see the included Passport Envelopes below for Danielle, Dawn and Dejon from their 2001 trip to Trinidad along with me. The enclosures all include the applicable photos for each of the three.

Danielle's Passport Envelope and Photo from 2001

Dawn's Passport envelop and Photo from 2001

Dejon's Passport Envelope and Photo from 2001

LOCATION UPDATE

Since those associated with Stone Creek Camp communicated with me on 3/9/2012 requesting that I take another look at this unique “awe-inspiring, jewel” type facility, I am going to do exactly that, as they respected my wishes in this regard (see included photo below). I have much respect for individuals who respect the rights and wishes of others.

Stone Creek Camp/Flathead Lake Facility

Unlike those who are so “full of themselves” as to refuse to admit that a mistake has been made rather than attempt to alter history in an effort to demonstrate infallibility (consistent with the pattern as documented in the November 4, 2004 edition of the Wall Street Journal on Page C3), or the pretenders who feign “change” but are so condescending with their idea of remorse that it is reminiscent of the documented accounts of the “snake oil” salesmen of the American “wild, wild, west days".

If I was incorrect in my initial assessment of this property, I will admit to it and press on if it turns out that this would make an ideal relocation “spot” for Conservery it will be added to the CONSERVERY BASIS FOR LOCATION SELECTION/EXCLUSION posting list of locations.

RECONCILING, APOLOGIZING AND BEING SORRY

This monthly theme series for March is intended to be self-evident, especially for anyone who has read any of the postings on this Blog.
Therefore not much is being added except to state that even acknowledging that a wrong has been committed and then how it is addressed, [in a social media (instant-gratification) type culture that rewards cover-up, cover-up, cover-up]; SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT THE TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL ANY PERSON TRULY IS.
Please note: 1) charitable so-called “giving” is excluded from consideration as a form of reconciling it may fall into the category of apologizing or even being sorry, 2) corporations are managed by individuals and 3) carefully managed pseudo events arranged to convey the impression of such a culture by a "golden-tongued" presenter are also excluded from consideration. 

CHANGE IS ON THE WAY

           
This video "Change Is On The Way" was prepared to introduce the unique type of transparent change sumarized in the content matter.
A version of  this video without sound efffects has been made available on the Conservery Proprietorship's Page of this Blog, which includes updates for impact.

LIFE-LONG MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIP BELIEVER

Divorce is a very complicated proceeding,
And it’s no wonder that some choose to evade this reasoning;
Then when property issues appear to be lasting,
That brings added reckoning.
However, a Quit Claim Deed procedure can rescue the situation,
When certain details are only implicitly listed for satisfaction,
And are not allowed to bog down the transaction.
Nevertheless, it is a valuable lesson in codification,
And deserves a how-to booklet for the do-it-yourselfer,
Who continues to believe that companionship is still a worthy exerciser,
When appropriate to implement, even for a foreigner,
Who remains a long-time acknowledger,
Even after being in a relationship that turned out to be a “failer”.
HOW GRATIFYING IT IS TO KNOW THAT “SPECIAL"
PURSUITS ARE STILL POSSIBLE FOR A LIFER,
Who is forced to be a cash payer (see below insert, as well as Comment #3 on CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 TO 2005 - ARBITRARILY)!



Receipt for payment of services received from indicated Attorney, for the record