HISTORICAL EVENTS CANNOT BE ALTERED BY RESOURCES - UPDATED W/INSERTS 3/12/2013

This follow-up to the previous post HISTORICAL EVENTS CANNOT BE ALTERED BY RESOURCES is being done to highlight issues documented on the Conservery Website from May 2005 to emphasize as documented in the title of this post that time does not alter events just because those with resources desire them to be for perpetual wealth-generating purposes and spreading rumors in the aid of whatever they choose (see the below photo insert and the BRAZANT/HARBIN WEDDING ALBUM FOR HISTORICAL PURPOSES ONLY - UPDATED 3/12/2013 for an example of the vows exchanged).



This post for historical purposes ONLY is regards the choice not to wear bands as noted for the reason stated and NONE other.

 

 

Of specific note is the Issue 8 (For Awareness Only) due to the identity-related issues taking place by those who believe that cover-up is viable alternative to any development (especially when “Society’s” types are involved), without regard for the rights of the individuals connected. ANY INDIVIDUAL NEEDING INFORMATION ABOUT ME SHOULD REQUEST IT FROM ME AND NOT RELY ON THOSE WITH SELF INTERESTED MOTIVES TO SPEAK ON MY BEHALF!

THE MISUSE OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS (EDITED)

This is an update of the previous posts with partial implications on the subject; 1) ANOTHER REASON FOR EXCLUDING LOCATIONS FROM CONSIDERATION, 2) ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE - UPDATED as well as THE ONE TRUE RELATIONSHIP CONSTANT to emphasize why such advancements in the wrong hands are not really the type of advancements intended by the originators.
The above post all in some manner deal with technology and its implications for society. However, in the wrong hands such advancements are a detriment to society as has been documented on the pages of this Blog. The writers of the article in that popular daily/weekend Business Publication from August 11, 2009 edition of (A17), describing the rapid pace of technological advancements probably meant that these improvements were all highly effective tools as long as there was the element of trust that they would always be used ethically. However, my adaptation of that point did not subscribe to this basic belief in any way, but to emphasize that only ONE can be trusted to direct (or order) the events an individual's life, not to the belief that “trust” could be placed in technological advancements to always be operated and used ethically by individuals. On the contrary as “Society’s” types have repeatedly shown their willingness to use any such method to further their ambitions of easily obtained credibility, ex: phone “spoofing”, “trawling” of online computer files unknown to the users for information to download and steal in the name of legitimacy, wealth accumulation and other unethical practices etc. 
What is being emphasized or pointed out here is that legitimate individuals don’t have to resort to methods such as electronic theft of a discarded email draft from a TRASH file to send to an unsuspecting (or cooperative) individual to inform him of their intent TO GET THEIR DESIRES IN another’s property, when all else (such as manipulation to obtain their desired outcome) has failed. Only those “Society’s” types and their Supporters with THIN standards use their resources to employ and rely on THEFT AND SUCH SIMILAR METHODS ROUTINELY AND THEN ELEVATION OF THE RECIPIENTS OF THE STOLEN CREDENTIALS INVOLVED (INTO LEADERSHIP POSITIONS) ETC., as a demonstration of ownership (such that their will be NO doubt of the “rightful” “ownership” by those involved in such “smoke and mirrors” credentials), as has been their pattern. Any semi-skilled actor can “play” the part of a leader (with the unseen assistance of other “Society’s” types propping him or her up), however, in the trenches, where such skills really would be needed to implement their professed qualifications, the dearth of such would be exposed and there is never any “ACTUAL” records of these types ever operating in the trenches that is not borrowed from others or just "REPORTED" on by one means or another.  

WHAT’S NEXT FOR AN INSTANT SOCIETY (EDITED/UPDATED)?

This subject matter from the previous post WHAT’S NEXT FOR AN INSTANT SOCIETY? is being edited and updated to include relevant details from the investment world about some of the underlying aspects of our instant society’s mindset from the IBD edition of 1/31/2003. This publication on page 1 under the caption “A GOOD BREAKOUT CAN TAKE TIME”, emphasized the following, once a leading stock that breaks out on heavy volume has been selected, and it quickly stalls, or even retreats to the buy point even after weeks have passed, the following action was to be avoided. The temptation to pursue another “highflier”, this could be a mistake. Instead, give a good stock time to build momentum, because often the pullback to start point is the prelude to strong gains. Such pullbacks can be a confidence shaker and even the best of stocks can dip back to their start (or pivot) point for short periods because all the weaknesses were not eliminated at the outset and such developments can “clear the decks” for a rise in value that can often occur in shaky markets. However, if it turns out that the stock is really a non-performer have a preset sell triggering point rule (ex. a 7% to 8%) from the buy point already in place. Basically, this article is advocating patience for the long run, a characteristic not practiced or valued in today’s society; hence the growth of the easily obtained “credentials” business, which some entities business model is based on and would not survive economically as functioning operations without reliance on such.
Those desirous of instant credentials without the associated work involved have to obtain "legitimate” records from somewhere and those of actual individuals are the only viable alternative, whether alive or deceased. This has become a “cottage” industry for those willing to provide such with a system in place to validate the practices to the detriment of those who have been impacted by such actions. This sequence of events that I stumbled unto may have been previously enacted against deceased individuals for the most part, however, the desire to cover-up the events in Vermont is probably what has led to the flagrant attempt to use my identity, accomplishments and qualifications in this manner. When enacting such activities drawing visible attention is avoided at all costs. However, because of the notion that it was felt that it could be implemented in a select environment, the decision was made to proceed; otherwise such a scheme would not be “flagged” in such an attention-getting way, in my opinion. See the post, “WHAT FACTORS ARE NEEDED FOR ATTEMPTING TO PROVE THAT ONE INDIVIDUAL CAN EXIST IN TWO PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES SIMULTANEOUSLY”, describing the ideal environment for such activities to be successful.     

THE ONE TRUE RELATIONSHIP CONSTANT (EDITED)

The purpose of this post is to provide an answer to the question raised in an earlier post, namely “WHAT’S NEXT FOR AN INSTANT SOCIETY?" 
This was intended to be a rhetorical question to make readers think about its implications, however, in doing research I have discovered the answer to my own question in the most unlikely of places and must be shared. In the August 11, 2009 edition of that popular daily/weekend Business Publication (A17), two Writers in an article about the fast pace of innovations made a very interesting point, namely because of the speed at, which technological and other innovations have occurred in recent years, which have seemingly made ten (10) year increments appear to comparative to a century of innovation from previous generations and that the only true constant is trust, and I wholeheartedly agree. This is a provocative but very valid conclusion, because if there is a lack of trust in any undertaking (whatever it is) between two parties, it’s doomed to failure at some point, whether sooner or later. However, when such a relationship is discover it is truly “something to be treasured”.
For some who have trusted and had their trust betrayed, rekindling such will not come easy, but it can be achieved in the correct environment. Sometimes adjustments made have to be made to “find” that correct environment but once achieved will become clearly apparent and/or will be discovered to be such on a daily basis. In effect, proving that with the speed at, which discoveries are made in these days, ONLY ONE TRULY REMAIN'S CONSTANT AND IS WORTHY OF TRUST ABOVE ALL ELSE. 

WHAT CROWN ARE YOU IN PURSUIT OF?

Many go through life in pursuit of some objective or goal and typically this is a good thing, except when it becomes an obsession. If life could be compared to horse racing’s Triple Crown, it would be said that eleven (11) horses have won that Crown (or title) and eleven (11) have lost. In 2012, another horse found itself in the enviable (or unenviable) position of becoming either the twelfth (12^th) to win or twelfth (12^th) to have lost. The Owners of that horse after assessing the horse’s chances scratched (or pulled) it from the race on race day.
How will history judge the horse that neither became the 12^th to win the Triple Crown nor did it become the 12^th to loose the third race in racing’s Triple Crown? It can only be said that the Owners knew when to quit. Life however, is not a horse race and when our goal(s) in life causes us to treat the lives of others as mere objects to be manipulated in the pursuit of any objective, then that goal has become an obsession and this should be a “red” flag that we are on the wrong path. Those who find themselves in such positions as horses do also wear blinders, only “selectively” seeing some singular objective ahead and nothing else, not knowing when to quit (as the Owners of the horse in 2012 Triple Crown decided to do). Whatever the obsession that drives such an individual, regardless of what is being chased, when the life of another is treated as a mere object for the manipulative reinventions of the latest version of reality chosen as the path to circumvent the express wishes of an individual who chooses to remain uninvolved with the world of a certain “Society’s’ Mogul, driven by his desire for a crown of sorts (namely, the “Wealthiest Person in the World”). My decision has often been repeated but is now clearly outlined in the post HOW WEALTH AND POWER CAUSES INDIVIDUALS/ENTITIES TO BEHAVE.
After some evaluation, my conclusion drawn is that this Mogul in pursuit of the “Title” (or Crown) he is pursuing, concluded that this “dream” would be realized in a certain continent and as a result decided to take certain liberties with my identity, qualifications and accomplishments as documented in the post AN EXAMPLE OF HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ID TRANSFER. When any individual sees their resources as the means to their obsession, it has become a mission that can only be compared to actions of dictators, especially when accustomed to getting the object of his desires and is confronted with an individual who stands in the way of his attempt to achieve his “Crown”. When the alternate view is used as documented in the post THERE IS ALWAYS AN ALTERNATE VIEW I TIME IS TAKEN TO FIND IT, to determine the scenario being confronted with, what is realized is that of a Mogul who can only see such an individual as an object to be neutralized (see the post WHAT FACTORS ARE THE NEEDED FOR ATTEMPTING TO PROVE THAT ONE INDIVIDUAL CAN EXIST IN TWO PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES SIMULTANEOUSLY.When a Mogul uses dictatorial methods in a “free” society he becomes more dangerous than those despots who openly carry out acts of terror against their opponents to instill fear by example in order to achieve whatever his objective is will also become a footnote (or maybe a page) in history. A review of history will find it full of such examples of dictators and tyrants who rose and fell and any Mogul who uses despotic methods without knowing when to quit will follow in their example, because the same methods employed by such are typically used against them. If anyone had told the former Bear Sterns CEO a mere five (5) years ago that this strong arm business practices as referenced in the popular daily/weekend Business Publication from June 8, 2012 (C1), practiced from his former lofty perch in that Entity would drive it into non existence, would not have been believed. Despots and dictators (including Moguls) who terrorize in pursuit of their objectives rise and fall, history always repeats itself in this regard.

HOW WEALTH AND POWER CAUSES INDIVIDUALS/ENTITIES TO BEHAVE!

They are those with a certain Moguls type belief, namely that financial inducements typically will win out in every situation. However, as discovered by a certain Asian Nation that follows this course of thinking, this is not always the case. This difficult lesson, means that in some instances, other issues can supersede even “billons in aid” as documented in that popular daily/weekend Business Publication from June 8, 2012 (A1/12), because as of the date of that article’s publication, sentiment in the Nation, which had been induced with such payments was seeing a backlash because National pride was at stake.
Similarly, those who who took many liberties with my history, identity, accomplishments and qualifications and their supporters is finding out that “purchasing” your way and networking is not always a guarantee of success regardless of employing methods such as: using inducements to effect support for their cause (based on favors and/or financial gain) in addition to overstating his level of support to attempt to effect caving in to his cause because of the inevitability of his obtaining success regardless of stated lack of interest in being in his “Society” or any other similar club.
Blatant unethical behavior and “gloating” about the ability to carry out such is unbecoming of any so-called “omnipotent Mogul”. Not all can and will be induced to employ unethical methods to carry out this Mogul’s  “bidding”. It just takes one to say no to his obsession with profits and wealth generation at all costs in spite of the measures used to get his targeted objective. This Mogul has no right to treat the rights of any individual with the type of blatant disrespect his “Society’s” types use because of this Mogul’s resources. SOME, WHO WORSHIP RESOURCES MAY HAVE PLEDGED ALLEGIANCE TO THIS MOGUL’S CAUSE FOR AN EASIER LIFE, BUT THE PRICE OF BEING IN HIS “SOCIETY” IS TOO HIGH FOR ME!



 

HAVE LESSONS REALLY BEEN LEARNED FROM THE RECENT FINANCIAL DISASTER (EDITED & RE-EDITED 1/4/2013)?

This question has significant implications as a result the recent financial experiences and is being re-edited to include a brief mention of the topic of Resolution Authority included in the new financial rule making to add to the powers of regulators to allow them to carry out their previous powers in the case of large financial institutions holding companies as well as to large insurance companies and why in my opinion, the writers did not favor it as the most viable alternative for achieving the desired outcome over the “Living Will” approach. Simply put, the existing method involves making judgments about the appropriate time to step in and take over the affairs of a financial institution that are always going to be second-guessed by shareholders and others with specific interests as oppose to the “Living Will” approach, which is a process to employ that would have certain mechanisms built in to trigger its implementation with regulators“oversight” instead of “managing the process”.   
This question is a valid one deserving of a straightforward answer, so it is being posed in this post to pursue its validity as would be expected in the current environment, therefore the question is being raised. Have real lessons been learned from the recent financial disaster? According to experts in the field, apparently not. The aftermath of the recent financial disaster produced corrective legislation, which included a tough new capital requirement and a new Consumer Agency but can these fixes really prevent a similar debacle from taking place? The honest answer is no one knows in all certainty. What it boils down to, is that after all the recent changes, the ultimate decision still relies on how policy makers, regulators and those critical positions act in the face of such a crisis should another such scenario develop not what they assert in the absence of being put to the test. In the July 13, 2012 edition of that popular daily/weekend Business Publication (A13), two Writers in positions to be knowledgeable of such details point out that IN THE ABSENCE “LIVING WILLS”, THE CONCEPT OF “TOO LARGE TO FAIL” HAS NOT BEEN CREDIBLY ADDRESSED and I agree.
Some may say what about the tougher new capital requirement for all financial institutions? These tough new rules 1^st of all won’t be implemented until 2019 and 2^nd if greater regulatory “financial” burdens are placed on institutions without a corresponding “Living Will” rule, it is all the more likely that another crisis will necessitate a taxpayer bailout because such a capital requirement was intended to preempt such an occurrence. On the other hand, what a “Living Will” would do in the event of financial distress is to ensure that an orderly wind down of operations take place. Even after all the events that have taken place in the recent financial disaster, such a course of action to prevent a recurrence of a reliance on a taxpayer bailout has not been addressed and this is not fair to taxpayers. This course of action would be a true lesson learned, taxpayers await such a demonstration of courage for those so called Too Big To Fail institutions that act as dictatorial entities unto themselves (allowing the identities/financial history of individual to be carved up and taken over by con artist and others from whom wealth can be assured) need to be left to rely only on their investors to bear the burden of orderly winding them down for the manner in, which they have and still continue to treat taxpayers. THIS IS ONLY FAIR(NESS). 





















 

WHEN STANDARDS ARE ELIMNATED, WHO TRIUMPHS?

This chosen subject matter is the focus of this post for the cause of upholding the standard bearers who hold their focus regardless of the tough economic times because if standards bearers (such as the ethical charitable organizations) do not uphold their cause even in tough times and start accepting donations regardless of the source, as documented in the article from that from daily/weekend Business Publication from April 21, 2009 (A17); then they stand to lose authenticity in their chosen fields of work. If such a path is followed, so too will the credibility of such organizations (assuming there is a concern for their reputations among those in this line of work), and as that old saying goes, when the going got tough, the true nature of those doing “good” was(is) revealed as they walked away from their causes.
Those who chose to accept donations from questionable sources in tough times are demonstrating that their operating standards are no better than hose of a certain Mogul who keeps reinventing his own “brand” or version reality to justify his perpetual wealth-generating schemes to cover-up his own “thin” operating standards and the lives of those trampled upon in his quest “new’ ways of generating revenue regardless of the path or method used. Altering one’s standards in any type of condition is a dangerous precedent and potentially can lead to very serious long-term consequences for those who adopt such courses of action.
The marginal operators welcome those that follow such methods because they are less standard bearers around to hold them accountable for the “real” operating practices used in the name of perpetual wealth generation, (such as using the guise of teaching English in a certain Asian country as a pretext for selling the “brand” to a whole new generation of potential customers (as documented in the April 20, 2009 of this same referenced publication (B1/5). It would be VERY interesting to find out what was the original “vehicle” (or basis) used to “sell” this concept to this Asian nation. If Conservery was so used, then further action is warranted to curtail any future of such by this entity and a return of all such funds raised in this manner (reportedly as much as $1000/student annually, the number of students “taught” English by this entity in not known), because if my Proprietorship was the basis for this Mogul’s foray into offering English in this Asian nation this represents a willful violation of my ownership rights while hiding behind a known con artist to continue his perpetual wealth generating based on stealing of identities/qualifications enacted by a critical lieutenant (reportedly waiting in the wings, “staging” all types of the highly ethical scenarios for, which he gained “fame’’ in order to make his triumphant return to his “rightful place” in this Mogul’s hierarchy, when the dust (is completely neutralized) for having implemented this “standstill” identity switching scam successfully - see the posts WHAT FACTORS ARE THE NEEDED FOR ATTEMPTING TO PROVE THAT ONE INDIVIDUAL CAN EXIST IN TWO PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES SIMULTANEOUSLY as well as USING THE ALTERNATE VIEW TO “SEE” THE REAL OBJECTIVE OF MERGER COUNTER OFFERS). As confirmed by this outline from the question raised in title, those without standards (even those that hide to implement their actions in stealth) always appear to be winners when standards are eliminated, maybe!  

THE FULFILLMENT OF MY FATHER'S LEGACY - UPDATED FOR CONSISTENCY

This follow-up to the post MY FATHER'S LEGACY, WHO FULFILLED IT? is being carried out to document for the record, the CONSISTENCY that exists between my stated positions as documented in the previous post, referenced above and this post THE IMPLICATIONS'S OF ALTERING A TRANSACTION'S HISTORY (EDITED - 12/3/2012) - UPDATED W/INSERTS, records and history as documented on the pages of this Blog and shown below in the composite from the Conservery Site from 6/11/2005 to bring CLARITY to an area deliberately "altered" by those in the business of selling the qualification/identities of others as referenced in the post WHAT FACTORS ARE NEEDED FOR ATEMPTING TO PROVE THAT ONE INDIVIDUAL CAN EXIST IN TWO PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES SIMULTANEOUSLY and those lacking in such and willing to pay for "easily" obtained "legitimacy". 



THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERING A TRANSACTION’S HISTORY (EDITED - 12/3/2012) - UPDATED W/INSERTS

This follow-up from where this post THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERING A TRANSACTION’S HISTORY (EDITED - 12/3/2012) UPDATED ended Is being carried out to include a summary of my experiences as pictured through the eyes of my brother, Paul in response to my earlier letter in, which I indicted that it was because of his educational example (in going back to school at UWI, Cave Hill after working for a number of years - see the highlighted section of the post MY FATHER’S LEGACY - WHO FILLED IT?) that gave me the encouragement to pursue this path myself but in the US. He candidly described the circumstances that I entered and endured to completed my studies (see the below letter),

The word above should be "DESCRIBING" 
 

Note: The Handwriting on this Envelope was that of my brother's original Wife Edith, who would use this method to get Paul to respond to correspondence (addressing the envelopes as a  reminder) since he never did like writing letters. 

unlike those (and their Supporters) who believe in easily obtained everything without having ever having to endure anything apart from publishing a “story” and then attempting to convince a “gullible” public of “legitimacy” (in two identities) because there is a host of other “Society’s” types propping up the fictional IDENTITY CRUTCH driven lives of such types so it must be “real”. However, if the background of the two-faced murals (of what is being relied on for the histories of the lives of these types) is observed, the twists and turns being relied on for the stories to even be tolerable are shockingly unbelievable. Hence the need for relying on constant advertising for the double realities of these “Society’s” types (as documented in the post WHAT FACTORS ARE THE NEEDED FOR ATTEMPTING TO PROVE THAT ONE INDIVIDUAL CAN EXIST IN TWO PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES SIMULTANEOUSLY). YOU CANNOT SIMPLY AFTER A NUMBER OF YEARS ABSORB THE IDENTITY, QUALIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF ANOTHER BY “CHERRY PICKING” WITHOUT EVER HAVING GONE THROUGH THEIR EXPERIENCES, BOTH HIGHS AND LOWS.

 

WHAT FACTORS ARE NEEDED FOR ATTEMPTING TO PROVE THAT ONE INDIVIDUAL CAN EXIST IN TWO PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES SIMULTANEOUSLY?

To even attempt to carry out such a mission, there are certain essential factors that have to be in place, such as: first factor is the availability for influencing the political process for the highest elected office in the land, the second factor, be sure that there is the ready 215% percent support of a certain Mogul known for his own “brand” of standards (see the post WHEN DISTRESSED CONDTIONS ARE ALLOWED TO OCCUR, AMENDED), and who is known for publicly voicing total support for and confidence in the methodology of a “critical” lieutenant (of MidAmerican Energy) even after being caught in the midst of unethical conduct and later had to resign), third rely on the thinking that advertising is a viable avenue to be relied on for achieving ANY desired outcome whether ethical or unethical, fourth be sure that if any collateral damage results (such as an individual whose identity is being decimated) either have such “collateral damage” “neutralized” (or contained) as well as rendered defenseless and fifth ensure that a cover-up mindset is established in the environment of choice. With these factors critical to the success of such a venture firmly in place the task at hand can be pursued because implementation is the most difficult part in this venture since obtaining the needed ingredients is not difficult once a target is selected.
Assuming all the necessary “boring” details such as identity switching/replacement in various locations, layoffs of those familiar with the “real” history, making quid pro deals, removing/replacing critical individuals are established etc., the main act can be carried out to convince the public of the new “truth”.
If you are in an environment that even considered pursuing such a challenge, public opinion is key to this bold undertaking in a type of reverse “Robin Hood” gamble of sorts and anything that even remotely threatens to convey a different picture of “Utopia” than otherwise portrayed must be carefully managed. For example, if the headline story in a certain popular daily/weekend Business Publication from July 18, 2012 focuses on the CEO from this State who embezzled approximately $215 million of his clients funds and is reported to have stated that famous line or sorts from a sitcom of years gone by in effect “the regulators made me do it”; ensure that in that same edition a story is carried, in a remote section (D) showing that a Professor from your State maintains a lifestyle that involves residences in two different states simultaneously in an article about gardening (with the other being a summer house in the “coincidental” state of Connecticut, but who cares about “facts” checking of such accounts), the thought has been “planted”. From this carefully “planted” and “thinly” veiled account, the “leap” is supposed to be made that “an individual can live in two principal residences, carry on two different lives (in different identities) achieve two different outcomes and that this is all a common occurrence. These are the lengths “Society’s” types have to go to in the name of easily obtained everything and have to be constantly “padding” their stories to account for the missing gaps that repeatedly occur, (but that is why the 215% support back-up is available), to plug all the “gaps” that routinely occur in their publicly advertised stories in order to keep up this “brand” of altered events. IT WOULD APPEAR IN HINDSIGHT THAT INSTANT ACCOMPLISHMENTS AREN’T AS EASILY OBTAINED AS AT FIRST APPEARED AFTER ALL, (see the post WHAT’S NEXT FOR AN INSTANT SOCIETY? ).

WHEN DISTRESSED CONDTIONS ARE ALLOWED TO OCCUR AMENDED

This follow-up to this previous post WHEN DISTRESSED CONDITIONS ARE ALLOWED TO OCCUR is carried out to point out that the investment by MidAmerican in 2008 in the location via, which this FEER subscription was ordered via check #2688 in 2004 does not change just because of their “grandiose” gesture based on a certain Mogul’s “principle” that , a) brandishing investment in conjunction with b) closing the USSBIA financial accounts through, which the check was written (for non existent reasons) alters historical events, in the pursuit of purchased “legitimacy”. See the below email communications.

 

WHEN DISTRESSED CONDTIONS ARE ALLOWED TO OCCUR

This is follow-up to the posts COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - UPDATED (10/30/2012) as well as HOW TO ESTABLISH AN INVESTIGATION THAT WILL BLAME NO-ONE to document that while the current financial crisis (of at least a century) was a crisis for many, not all suffered as a result and this post is an effort to help put this series of events in proper perspective for a better understanding. According to that popular daily/weekend Business Publication from August 26, 2011 a certain well-known Mogul went on a spending spree during this fiasco for many and profited greatly. Those deals between 2008 and 2009 totaled more than $21 billion in such corporate Titans as, Wall Street’s Goldman, General Electric, Swiss Reinsurance Co, Dow Chemical Co and Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co in the form of preferred equity, bonds and other preferred instruments with some of the highlights as follows:

In 2008:
GOLDMAN & SACHS GROUP INC. - $5 billion for, which Goldman paid $5.5 billion to redeem in the spring of 2011 after having previously paid $1 billion in dividends to the Mogul (as of the time of this article the stock had dropped 12%).
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO - $3 billion in preferred stock to boost liquidity for, which GE was expected to repay the Mogul in terms similar to what he obtained from Goldman (however, as of the article’s writing the stock had dropped 37%).

BYD (Shenzhen, China based manufacturer of “Green” vehicles), - US$1.8 billion for a 10% stake in that company through its MidAmerican Energy unit), A deal at the time thought to be a wise investment with its rising share price, however by 2011 the price had fallen to around HK$16/share down from a high of approximately $19/share (as reported in the August 24, 2011 edition of that popular daily/weekend Business Publication).


In 2009:
SWISS REINSURANCE CO - $2.6 billion in the form of a loan to rebuild its capital and in return the Mogul received 12% annual return in securities and the loan has been repaid.

In 2011:
Even though the Judge in the case wasn’t impressed by the $33 million “sweetheart” settlement worked out with the SEC and BofA, as previously documented in comment # 1 from 12/23/2012 on the COMMENTS 2 Page, (the mere fact that it was publicly proposed was sufficient) for some Mogul who apparently offered to “invest” in their institution to the tune of the $5 billion he was reported to have offered to invest in this entity that began with a phone call from this Mogul office at approximately 11:00 am on August 24, 2011 and ended one day later the 25th at 8:30 am with the Board of Directors approving the infusion. What a vote of confidence from One (noted for his highly “thin” standards) in this Institution for having the courage to publicly propose their $33 million settlement deal with the SEC (to provide a con artist with “legitimacy” based on another’s records). Could it be that this was a quid pro quo deal worked out and would have taken place anyway, irrespective of whatever else occurred, because it provided support for this entity’s identity switching/stealing, perpetual wealth generating methodology?
In conclusion, since this crisis, which just happened to bring about “coincidental” distressed conditions for many, not all suffered therefore, no-one can be at fault when a few profited so handsomely at the expense of so many, because if one individual knew to bet against the subprime market as documented in the post “WHAT’S NEXT FOR AN INSTANT SOCIETY? ”, at least another [who is known as a type of “Sultan of Panama” and prides himself as being omnipotent (because for some unknown reason he appears to be knowledgeable of all the events in my life) and who profited handsomely (in his all-knowing wisdom) most likely, also knew]. I WONDER WHAT TYPE OF DISTRESSED CONDITIONS WILL “COINCDENTALLY” OCCUR AT SOME POINT IN TIME NEXT TO ENABLE THIS MOGUL TO PROFIT GREATLY OUT OF THE SUFFERING OF SO MANY? This is in a nutshell why a “WHO” answer was not possible in that financial crisis inquiry, in my opinion.

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES RULE THE DAY AMENDED

This is an update to the previous post UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES RULE THE DAY in the interest of accuracy after conducting additional research to ensure that a more completed picture was being viewed of the circumstances surrounding the example 2 used regarding the delivery giants with names that sounds like Phextes and Youpzs, and what was realized was that this entity’s (Phextes) Founder and CEO guards the position of the Company he founded in 1971 with much passion. Furthermore, there is an ongoing and long-standing rivalry between these two nemeses. Therefore, this Entity’s position has to be viewed in this light because of the intense competitive nature of their business. For example, when the Phextex CEO announced in July 2010 that his organization had purchased new transportation equipment, which in his opinion would be a “game changer” in the competition with his archrival Youpzs in the Asian delivery and pickup route. Youpzs immediately responded that they did not believe the new equipment would a game changer of any type and even if such was the case, they had the means necessary to adjust their own network to neutralize any competitive advantage even if any such were to occur. The Founder finished his announcement as reported in that popular daily/weekend Business Publication from July 14, 2010 by pointing out that “the secret of this business is you’ve got to have a defensive strategy, as well as an offensive strategy.” Therefore, in conclusion, it is being pointed out that the actions of both Phextes as well as Youpzs have to be viewed in the light of these highly competitive circumstances.  

WHAT'S NEXT FOR AN INSTANT SOCIETY?

There is a real dilemma, which describes polar opposite scenarios with no easy answers in sight facing our society. At one end of the scale there exists the hedge fund industry with assets reportedly managed by such funds totaling $1.92 trillion by the end of 2010, which was up by 20% from the previous year. To better place this in proper perspective, these assets increased a staggering one hundred and fifty ($150) billion in the fourth (4^th) quarter of 2010 alone. The dilemma that exists is the average of 8% to 9% unemployment figure that existed even during the referenced year and still exists while some boldly claim in front of millions that things are on the “right’ track and that “no-one else could have done better” given the existing conditions. In the face of the desperation conditions many have experienced as a result of the worst financial crisis in almost a century many believed this to be true.
The point being made here is this, why is it not possible for some individual to devise a method to make these two scenarios benefit each other? A method is possible to solve most dilemmas, however, the biggest drawback is the type of mindset that has overtaken society (like a controlling vine), which has deluded us to become seduced with INSTANT “everything”. As a result, its difficult to expect anyone to wait for years for returns on their investments instead of the average of 10.5% annual return on investment of these types of investment vehicles, not even taking into account the average gain of 15% annual return for the Standard & Poor’s (S & P) 500 index and the 19% return on the average stock mutual fund. In some individual cases an increase of 590% in a single year is possible, (as occurred by the individual who correctly bet that the subprime mortgage market was about to implode and personally made four (4) billion in the process in 2007 (as reported in that popular daily/weekend Business Publication from January 28, 2010 (A1/2).
It is because of the “meism” of our society exemplified best by the dearth of “reality” television programs with the promise of INSTANT stardom for “one” successful contestant, etc. explains best why these two (2) can’t be successfully devised to be beneficial for each other because Fund Manager wouldn’t be able to realize their billion-dollar/year average returns and would lose their reputations as being elite Managers. After all, why should anyone have to wait to achieve “success” in the age of: instant food, instant beverages, instant accomplishments, instant identities, instant qualifications, instant access, instant mail, instant communications, instant credit, instant elections, instant crops, instant stardom, instant military records, instant cures and even instant families may now also be available.
Clearly, the investment resources are available to address one part of the dilemma, however, the real question that exists is, is the will available to make these two (2) scenarios work for each other? Our society may be too far down the INSTANT road to be able to successfully tackle this scenario without some unplanned event of such a magnitude bringing about conditions to “force” society to rethink its values in the conundrum we are facing. However, there is always a chance for real CHANGE to turn the tide!

HOW TO ESTABLISH AN INVESTIGATION THAT WILL BLAME NO-ONE!

According to HWJ Jr., a writer from that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication, if you are investigating the underlying issues involved in causing the greatest financial breakdown in nearly a century (as occurred in 2008), start by asking an irrelevant question. In his opinion, the WHO was not addressed only the WHAT. My late Mother in her wisdom would point out “if you start wrong, you are not going to end up right”. HWJ Jr. in the January 29/30, 2011 edition (A17) concluded that the investigation was an exercise in political correctness because the relevant WHO question (or the elephant in the room for lack of a better symbol) was not addressed. What was missing in my opinion was clarity of focus, such as was exercised by those who established the “ground rules” for determining at whose doorstep ALL the (complex security issues involved in the changing role of an Embassy in a “war” zone) responsibility for the blame in the recent Syrian Embassy issue, lay. For example, if an embassy is called upon to provide assistance to another Department or Agency (especially one more proficient in security measures), who bears overall responsible for adequate security, especially if such practices are carried out in a “war” zone? That Report from all media reports left no doubt about the central responsible party and it can only be concluded that all these secondary factors were examined in arriving at the conclusion drawn. It only goes to show in all fairness, that the “will” to find out the WHO is possible, on occasion does take place. All that’s needed is to find out is, what are the type of contributing “factors” required in order to establish clearly focused ground rules that “target” the relevant criteria, such that the focus will be consistently clear instead of being diffused on occasion, (in the opinion of some).
Perhaps by this action, it was demonstrated that the Writer in the December 31, 2009 edition of the same Popular Publication (A13) was not correct in concluding that under the current Administration, “we have pulled back from the foreign world. We’re smaller for accepting that false choice between burdens at home and burdens abroad, and the world beyond our shores is more hazardous and cynical for our retrenchment and our self-flagellation.” However, it may take more than a single decisive action such as this to prove this writer wrong, (when the state of the world is taken into consideration). Maybe, it was the loss of “life” that marshaled all the competing interests, but what about all the secondary indirect lives impacted by the financial disaster either directly or indirectly. Who can say with any certainty that loss of “life” did not occur as a result of the financial disaster and that those as well as the surviving do not deserve a WHO answer as well! This demonstrates fair(ness) to those impacted in the financial crisis scenario and does not represent a delve into political policy on my part!
NOTE: This Writer is taking steps to ensure that the repeated use of “we” is not inclusive just because of my use of this quotation in this subject. This position is necessary especially since “Society’s” types standards for demonstrating “legitimacy” are very “thin”.

USING THE ALTERNATE VIEW TO “SEE” THE REAL OBJECTIVE OF MERGER COUNTER OFFERS

When a company makes an offer forcing another in the midst of merging with a third entity to reassess their proposed deal, what typically are the real underlying reasons for such offers? Sometimes what is not stated openly may be more than meets the eye. Consider the following two (2) examples:

• When the Reinsurer’s division of a certain Mogul made a $52/share offer for Transatlantic Holdings inc. to the tune of $3.25 billion, this led Transatlantic to state that this offer was likely to lead to a “superior proposal” to its merger agreement with the third Company as reported in a popular Daily/Weekend Business publication from August 5, 2011 (C3). Since Transatlantic had already agreed to a merger with Allied World Assurance co. this offer led to a sell off of that Company’s stock thereby decreasing the value of its offer by 1.4% to $2.72 billion, and the value of a rival’s (Validus Holdings Ltd) third hostile bidder’s offer to $2.79 billion as that Company’s stock dropped by 4.7%. This course of action appears to be aimed at forcing Allied World to commit to a more expensive merger offer, weakening this Company in order to force them into a position needed to obtain the “superior (quid pro quo) proposal”. Could it be that some form of identity switching/ mangling activity was the real aim of weakening Allied World into accepting some “behind-the-scenes” type “credibility” activity for some Transatlantic “Society’s” type fraud with the $52/share offer?
• Similarly when MidAmerican Energy holdings caused WPL to increase it merger offer for the then IES Industries with its (“prearranged” - see the below photo of a composite) hostile bid, was this action by this entity (now part of this Mogul’s Conglomerate) aimed at placing WPL into a weakened position to force them into acceptance of an impostor/con artist needing an identity from an individual hired for the purpose of identity transfer via quid pro quo deal-making (see the post ADDENDUM TO AN EXAMPLE OF HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ID TRANSFER - UPDATED)? As it turned out, this Window-Dresser CEO showed that he also was “Society’s” type material and could be brought in exchange for a “price.” He was later rewarded handsomely for his (quid pro quo) part in this “multi-layered” merger (see the posts EXPLANATION OF A DISASTER-PRONE WINDOW-DRESSING PERSON) and HOW TO IMPLEMENT IDENTITY THEFT AND LEGITIMIZE FRAUD - UPDATED.  

 



 

WHY WOULD THERE BE A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING HEDGE FUNDS IDENTITY MASKING AFTER THE MADOFF FIASCO (EDITED)?

This post is a follow-up to comment # 2 from 12/27/2012 on the COMMENTS 2 Page to attempt to answer the question raised to find a logical answer to why would such be permissible in this environment after the disastrous fiasco identified that went “unnoticed” for so long by so many. Well it would appear that those in the IDENTITY MASKING AND/OR SWITCHING business are “held” to different “standards” than most in effect they must be “Society’s” types. These types can: a) commit mail fraud, b) enter locked vehicles and “plant” evidence, c) close financial accounts of a targeted individual without reasons, d) obtained Social Security Administration “legitimacy” based on a “flawed” business card, e) completely take over the history of a targeted individual (including accomplishments and qualifications), f) steal a State Income Tax Refund check “to prove legitimacy”, g) illegally switch property records from one side of the road to the other to prove “authenticity” and h) after all these highly “ethical” practices claim to be the “originals” without consequences [see the post HOW TO STEAL WITHOUT VIOLATING COPYRIGHT MATERIAL CRITERIA (EDITED) ].
If you are able to carry out such activities as documented above and still present yourself as an ethical business operator of ANY type (even believing yourself to be a type of "Sultan of Panama"); then you can also ensure that financial overhaul guidelines also include a needed loophole for IDENTITY MASKING (AND/OR SWITCHING) in case the cloak of anonymity is needed at anytime to “hide” inexplicable funds of your "Society's" types and “gloat” that you are preferred five (5) to one (1) over another not in your “Society”. What is the moral here? If any individual is willing to operate in a “fictional world” with thin to zero standards and not be held accountable for illegal and/or highly unethical actions perpetrated, in the name of legitimacy and perpetual wealth-generation, then the “Society’s” type existence is the place for you. However, if you are the one (1) interested in CHANGE to be capable of ADAPTING TO SEE THE ALTERNATE VIEW, then THERE IS NOW ALSO A REAL CHOICE AVAILABLE. However, be warned “Society’s” types cannot take competition of any type, it’s their way or “WAR” (see the post NO BASIS FOR INVOLVEMENT IN PRIVATE MATTERS AS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION).

NO BASIS FOR INVOLVEMENT IN PRIVATE MATTERS AS GUARNTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION

This follow-up to my comment # 1 from 12/27/2012 on the COMMENTS 2 Page documents my basis for my position indicating why my former Employer’s should in no way be involved in my plans made as a private individual because even the Constitution limits the powers of the States in Article 10 to form “agreements or compacts with another state…or engage in war”. To restrict the rights of any individual by subtle financial imprisonment can be compared to a type of embargo enacted when making “war” with another and this is what is being meted out to me, which is unconstitutional since the State is complicit in this action otherwise my State Income Tax Refund check would not have been stolen, blatantly (see NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK).
Just as my position was clearly documented in the communication outlining my basis for declining from taking part in the Company incentive pay award program (see below photos documenting my position), it is only fitting that my former Employer

 

"Maintaned" should be "MAINTAINED" 

 

respectfully carry out the only ethical course of action possible here, namely, reciprocating by non involvement on the part of this entity regarding my personal affairs. This employer has no basis for involvement and should refrain from using any second or third party targeting in association with its “allies” to effect such involvement.

RANDOMLY OCCURRING EVENTS OR A PATTERN (EDITED)!

What are the chances of these various events documented in the post “HOW DOES STATE SPONSORED ID THEFT WORK?” being “random” occurrences, “independent” of each other? These are not samples chosen by me in such a manner as to influence the outcome but actual events that occurred. Furthermore, the relative frequency with, which these events took place has also not been influence by me because I had no way of influencing this population’s development. Therefore, the probability of these events being randomly occurring events can be determined by rigorous statistical methods but since this is not my objective, more general conclusions are being drawn especially when the developments surrounding event number 4 from the list in the previously referenced post, (post accident) are examined in greater detail, concurrent with other developments that took place.

As a result of the documented accident, which occurred at a definite point in time as previously described, my current vehicle with a VIN that “coincidentally” ends with the digits “…822” was obtained. When this development is viewed collectively with other events connected to me that also included these two last digits 22, (as discussed on this Blog’s” Pages in various posts); it is clear that they are not “random” occurrences in my opinion. Finally, the conclusion is being drawn that these developments are the result of those “skilled” in the art of identity switching/mangling “historically” as a business to produce the desired financially beneficial outcome (after the fact) to enable “walking away” with the identity of another as documented in the post  “HOW TO STEAL WITHOUT VIOLATING COPYRIGHT MATERIAL CRITERIA (EDITED) ”.

NOTE: The above outcome admittedly appears to be a limited set of events from, which my conclusion appears to have been drawn. However, the result is also based on the assumption that all the occurrences in, which the numbers depicted “randomly appeared” for example, such as: 1) in a utility dividend check supportive details, 2) product delivery dates (for example ’05 Conservery calendars and other numerous other requested deliverables) and 3) the utility account assigned by my former Employer at my first residence in this State, etc. could not have occurred in the “random” manner in, which they all happened. MY ACCOMPLISHMENTS/QUALIFICATIONS WERE NOT UNDERTAKEN MERELY AS “RANDOM” OCCURRENCES TO PROVIDE “CREDIBILITY” FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL(S) OR (HIGH-SPEED RAIL) AS WELL AS ANY OTHER SIMILAR PROJECT REGARDLESS OF HIS/HER/(THEIR)/ITS STATUS!