ONE OF THE "SOCIETY'S" FAVORITE MECHANISMS FOR "IDENTITY" VALIDATION

I have discovered over the years that the method used by many to redress “wrongs” have become corrupted by those types seeking a measure of “legitimacy” for their alter egos. The Class Action Suit is perfect for “Society’s” types because it enables involvement in a legal (or Court) proceeding as part of a large group activity, without involvement individually. I became tired of the endless number of such suits that came to this address (8263 140^th Ave, Olin, IA) over the years for products and services in my name, some of, which I never purchased, while others I did. However, one common theme that marked all such notices, I never received any notification of the settlement outcome from any of the Suits, which I received notice as being a party to. Therefore, for those thinking and “fighting” for such legal status as a means of redressing “wrongs”, please note that this method has been co-opted by the “Society’s” types as their main means of identity validation. I am not going to names in this matter to avoid providing a measure of vindication for those profiting (or benefiting) from this dirty little “scam” that enables them a measure of demonstrating validation by the “courts” and by this manner identity possession “in a group”, which has been “validated by the courts”. The result is that this in turn allows for the establishing of financial accounts in the name being co-opted, whose accounts will ultimately be closed and the financial history sought will be gained at the expense of those who the “Society’s” types see as MERE OBJECTS FOR THE LEGITIMACY OF OTHERS. Therefore, to those who have been seduced into thinking that demonstrating financial capability is the only measure of legitimacy, this is an ideal (or “foolproof”) method (see the post NUMBER ONE (1) AT ALL COSTS). The only Class Action that will be identified in parody form is that of the long-time insurance Provider from, which products were purchased over the years that have a slogan, which sounds like “GONE SORE HIDE” but was not retained as my Provider once my Divorce activity well set into motion, for obvious reasons.
This path for such types is the best of both of their worlds; since it enables them to claim “legal” cover (or face) for their covert identities as a group, while maintaining their public face that they are known by (these have given new meaning to the term “TWO-FACED”). It is for this reason that “Society’s” types cannot produce anything that requires “stand alone” validation, their sole weakness. For validation purposes, as long as you produce any type of authentic evidence, it can and will be duplicated by such types, with access to the untold resources of the supporters in their “Group”. In addition, if validation requires the support of anything at all, “Society’s” types will demonstrate “legitimacy” as long as it is known. It is because of my experiences with routinely being inundated with such suits, that my aversion to “ClassActionSuitSociety’s” mania was coined Retroactively into the Proprietorship’s Administrative Operating Guideline as criterion iv (see Authorization iv in the below composite photo of the Conservery's Admin Policy).