JUDGING BY THE COVER ALONE - A MISTAKE ALWAYS

To most today, in our made for television “society”, if it appears to be, it is assumed to be just that. However, making major decisions based on what soothes is never good policy; whether its for a “big ticket” item or some other selection or choice between two, a decision should never be made because of what appeals because the soothing type product is usually not what it’s presented to be. For example, given the choice, what appears to be a “made for TV” alternative in the choice between two, if a cross-sectional view is gained, may in fact turn out to be a completely crude quilt held together by layers of “woolen” type complicated, “virtual” links, unrealistic connections and unmet production target outputs; as oppose to the alternative comprised of a large bundle of blossoms of the type of multi-faceted collection from among those whom our society may label, but the former may be selected because only the “made for television” side only is seen.

Similarly, words in a comment to a post made earlier by me to the effect that “who really knows what is hunkering beneath that operation” were chosen very carefully and should never be assumed to convey something other than what was meant, that is why determining through discovery what is being conveyed is so very important. Unearthing the facts involves finding out exactly what is being conveyed before forming opinions, a practice not employed by those whose object is typically to steer others in a specific direction chosen by them in an effort to demonstrate that “they have nothing to hide”. This business model discussed in that Comment appears to perfectly fit the lifestyle of a former Engineering (work) colleague and his spouse ideally. Therefore to find this lifestyle turned into a business and by another led me to the conclusion made, wondering aloud, where did the idea originate? This is due to the fact that I have learned over the years from experience not to believe in coincidences and knowing the penchant for some with “two faces” to assume the history of others in unimaginable ways, in an effort to demonstrate legitimacy including selected acquaintances, and pilfer ideas along the way, have been learned is possible to "create" by "Society's" types .

In addition, I am also aware of an unpretentious lady who if placed in the same situation as outlined in the description above between the two alternatives may appear at first glance to be the type of individual who would not be chosen by our “Society’s” Moguls and other powers that be, to even allow her to enter the “finals”; but if given the appropriate opportunity and connections, would rise to the occasion.

In conclusion, it must be emphasized that decisions made by assuming what is being conveyed by the cover alone is never good policy, furthermore inquiries should always be made to determine what is being conveyed, it is the ONLY respectful course to chart regardless of the chorus of “Society’s” types who are usually disrespectful and loud in their opposition to anything or anyone who upsets their neatly packaged perpetual wealth-generating “virtual” world. NEVER JUDGE BY THE COVER ALONE, ALWAYS TRY TO TAKE A LOOK INSIDE, EVEN IF BY THE UNSPOKEN DETAILS CONVEYED, WHICH CAN AND DO “SAY” A GREAT DEAL MORE THAN WHAT IS DESIRED TO BE PROJECTED.