Wikipedia Sarch Link

Search results

Monday, September 24, 2012

AN A-TO-Z EXPOSÉ OF THE VIRTUAL SOCIETY’S METHODOLOGY - UPDATED


This previous post AN A-TO-Z EXPOSÉ OF THE VIRTUAL SOCIETY’S METHODOLOGY was updated to include specific examples and other more relevant data to clarify the subject matter by providing concrete factual data not obtained either at the expense of anyone or with the resources/influence of any individual/entity motivated by perpetual wealth generating schemes, but entirely based on actual historical events for the record. Note that the previous links were not included in this updated version.


In today’s digital society when it is not really possible to know who is on the other end of the communicating medium and where technological advances have made it possible for a “virtual” society to flourish on both sides of the Atlantic; how can you tell who is real and who is an impostor (for those who are truly interested in accuracy)? Follow this alphabetical outline to assist in the determination;


·        You cannot tell because of the advertisements they display, because it could all be “smoke and mirrors”.


·        You cannot tell by the “bucks” (or resources) they flaunt, because it’s not possible to tell how they are obtained.

·        You cannot tell by the “crests” they display, because they are chameleons and can become anything desired to gain their objective.

·        Most definitely, the diplomas they show cannot be relied on because they can be purchased with the appropriate connections.

·         It is not possible to tell by the extras that support them, because these individuals may themselves be “virtual” impostors.

·        You cannot tell by the “virtual friends” who vouch for them, because these individuals may themselves also be “virtual” impostors.

·        You cannot with any accuracy tell by the grants, which they donate to various causes, because if their resources are questionably obtained, charitable grants are meaningless.

·          It isn’t possible to tell by the history, which they purport to have because to the “virtual’ types, such events are typically borrowed (see the below historical linking photos) and the posts CORRECT IDENTIFICATION BY CONNECTING THE DOTS,
 
The Listing Agent who Facilitated the Purchase of the Brandford Condo Where I Resided When My Patent Application was Filed in 1984.
My Residence When the Patent was Completed - 1988 

 
 
This is not the same Company as the Company Chosen
to Represent in a Marketing Arrangement as in Indicated
in the post Correct Identification By Connecting the Dots
link above
 

·        The investments they make are not an accurate barometer of their true identity, because if the sources of their income are “virtual”, it doesn’t matter where their funds are outwardly deposited for legitimacy.

·         Definitely you cannot rely on the jester who is elevated to support impostors in communion.

·         The stories of their supposed knowledge is not reliable or credible because these types cannot function without armies of “supporters”.

·         The lifestyles they are reported to live by cannot be really validated.

·         Their medical records that exist in their alter ego or “virtual” identities cannot be relied on for credibility.

·         The networks they are credited with originating rely on unethical tactics only.

·         Even the offspring they use to hide behind for credibility, in actuality belong to others.

·         Candidates and others whose only calling card is depicted by, deception, deceit and deviousness represent their politics.

·        You cannot tell by either the astounding questions noted as having been raised by them as a result of pseudo-events.

·         Furthermore, you cannot tell by the RSVPs rejected by them in their virtual identities (in, which they are not publicly known but only privately, and relied on only to give them credibility).

·         Without question, you cannot tell by the stamped-signatures used with their virtual identities (IDs).

·         In addition, you cannot tell by their tours-of-duty, because these can also be fictitious.

·         You cannot tell by the universities to, which they donate (often in large measure) for credibility purposes only, these credentials can be borrowed with the appropriate connections.

·          Most definitely, their visas cannot be relied on since they are using borrowed IDs.

·          Undoubtedly, the wisdom ascribed to them is not original but banal.

·         Even the x-rays they use are embellished to support their “virtual” IDs because the facts don’t support their assumed alter egos.

·         Their yearbooks are definitely invalid and cannot be relied on for the obvious reasons, because these can be doctored with the right donations and

·         In reality, these individuals are “Zebras”, as they are of one pigmentation (or identity) externally, (or in public) but marked by a completely different color (or identity) underneath (or privately).   

19 comments:

J_F_Brazant said...

This follow-up is intended as a challenge, because I am not in the business of producing details from my history, which Entities with untold resources can duplicate and dispute once they are aware of them. Therefore for the individuals who are fond of producing information after the fact and supporting those hiding with their alter egos and trying to prove that they have had the exact history as myself with the assistance of those with the resources to produce anything and claiming my history, please produce evidence demonstrating precisely what I (James F. Brazant) accomplished of a professional nature on the following dates:
· March 14, 1985
· March 3, 1988
· March 14, 1988
Please show by producing evidence, what was accomplished professionally by James F. Brazant (whom you are claiming to be) on those dates in question.

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

The challenge evidence must: 1) contain a signature(s), 2) be unique and 3) clearly have been achieved/undertaken by James F. Brazant. In summation, it must be pointed out that it does NOT and is not supported by anything purchased.

J_F_Brazant said...

The reason for the purchased stipulation is to avoid those who FREQUENT PAST ESTABLISMENTS AS A "MARK" OF LEGITIMACY (- link on COMMENTS Page), digging up past records, such as the purchase of a used Mercury from the then Merriam Motors Lincoln/Mercury Dealership of Wallingford, CT (circa 1983), massaging this transaction and assigning it to some "Society's" type as supporting evidence of having been in a location and at a time that begs of blatant records switching to support ID transfer along with some other contrived pieces of evidence "dreamed-up" to support the specific dates identified. The inclusion of this stipulation is to avoid anything of the above nature occurring.

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

There is an important reason why activities/accomplishments from the dates in question were chosen and equally as important is the basis for excluding any association with purchases, namely to free these more subtle achievements from the potential of being cross-contaminated by those whose philosophy is centered solely on financial capability as a measure of historical legitimacy, irrespective of whether or not this “new fund” capability is borrowed or stolen. “Society’s” types who brandish this feature as their “mark” of legitimacy, forgot that other things apart from the major accomplishments do play just as important if not more important a role in an individual’s identity, because if it were not for these otherwise more subtle or mundane details, the major accomplishments would not have been achieved since they are a testament to them. These details include those unique chronological details, which can’t be transported across international continental borders conveniently (see the posts 1) ANOTHER UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF HAVING A ‘VIRTUAL” IDENTITY, 2) SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES - UPDATED and 3) the highlighted sections of ADDENDUM TO GIVING "LIFE" THE OLD FASHIONED WAY UPDATED (9/1/2012) TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY - links on COMMENTS Page). Note: just because a purchase from the dates closer to the latter date used (from a then Dealer that sold multiple disconnected makes/models of vehicles (see photo included below - on COMMENTS Page) and located on a street with the name of a prominent Northeastern City), is resurrected and transferred to “Society” types for legitimacy and this is in turn supported by those with financial inducements to validate such as legitimate as well as to corroborate the “dreamt-up” achievements, does not change the main premise, that these achievements/accomplishments, each with a specific signature(s) cannot be associated with anything purchased, as emphasized above. And finally, I would like to reiterate the message of the post from January 23, 2012 and apologize to anyone who was truly deceived by those “Society’s” types using financial history alone as their measure of legitimacy and by so doing misled some into thinking that Conservery was just another run-of-the-mill Proprietorship offering targeted political strategy that would be just willing to “throw” contests when the “Society’s” conditions so desire it, (see the post TO WHO IT MAY CONCERN - link on COMMENTS Page).

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

Consistent with my committment not to include any material praising those in anyway responsible for the misrepresentation of my identity on this Blogs pages, the material in the previous comment was removed.

J_F_Brazant said...

The fourth day of this challenge points out that you cannot: 1) be removed from divorce proceedings completely as the below evidence supports (photo on COMMENTS Page), 2) be devoid of personal unique details free of any cross-contamination that purchases can bring about as carefully shown here and 3) rely only on unjustifiable financial history alone that does not match up with the immediate individual claiming to be the legitimate James F. Brazant while relying on a pot-pourri of hastily strewn together band of "international" dentity-seeking types and still pretend to be James F. Brazant in a covert alter ego while actively being another personality publicly. All the “King’s” Horses And All The “King’s” Men Can’t Make Such Individuals Brazant’s Again.

J_F_Brazant said...

The fourth day of this challenge points out that you cannot: 1) be removed from divorce proceedings completely as the below evidence supports (photo on COMMENTS Page), 2) be devoid of personal unique details free of any cross-contamination that purchases can bring about as carefully shown here and 3) rely only on unjustifiable financial history alone that does not match up with the immediate individual claiming to be the legitimate James F. Brazant while relying on a pot-pourri of hastily strewn together band of "international" dentity-seeking types and still pretend to be James F. Brazant in a covert alter ego while actively being another personality publicly. All the “King’s” Horses And All The “King’s” Men Can’t Make Such Individuals Brazant’s Again and NEITHER DOES ILLEGALLY DIVERTING MAIL FOR A FAMILY'S MEMBER'S APARTMENT BELONGINGS CURRENTLY IN STORAGE (DANIELLE'S), AND ATTEMPTING TO PAY FOR IT, DOESN'T CHANGE ANY INDIVIDUAL'S IDENTITY OVERNIGHT.

J_F_Brazant said...

Day five of this challenge serves to collctively reinforce the requested criteria, as follows: for the individual(s) who is(are) hiding with their alter egos and trying to prove that they have had the exact history as myself with the assistance of those with the resources to produce anything and claim my history, please produce evidence demonstrating precisely what I (James F. Brazant) accomplished of a professional nature on the following dates:
· March 14, 1985
· March 3, 1988
· March 14, 1988
Please show by producing evidence, what was accomplished professionally by James F. Brazant (whom you are claiming to be) on those dates in question. Furthermore, the challenge evidence must: 1) contain a signature(s), 2) be unique and 3) clearly have been achieved/undertaken by James F. Brazant. In summation, it must be pointed out that IT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY ANYTHING PURCHASED.

J_F_Brazant said...

Day six (6) of this challenge and counting!!!!!!

J_F_Brazant said...

Day seven (7) of this challenge September 30th, 2012 was uneventful, as it still was not met!!!!!!!

J_F_Brazant said...

Day eight (8) of this challenge is being used to emphasize the fact that deceptive claims sent to the email address jfbrazant@gmail.com, at carefully selected times to justify dreaming up fictitious events to satisfy this challenge does not provide any “Society’s” type identity-seeking individual with legitimacy. As a result, on this day of the challenge, an added criterion is being included, namely that the evidence CANNOT BE ASSOCIATED WITH ANY PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERIOD, WHETHER PURCHASED OR FREELY OBTAINED. (NOTE: THIS ADDRESS, WAS INITIATED BY ME FOR MY PERSONAL USE ONLY AND WAS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE ANY IMPOSTOR WITH AN ALTER EGO TO HIDE BEHIND, REGARDLESS OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN)!!!!!!!!

J_F_Brazant said...

For further updates to this Challenge see the "stand alone" CHALLENGE Page - link on COMMENTS Page.