THE CASE OF THE MISSING DEAL-MAKER

This Case of the Missing Deal-Maker whom the then Opportunistic Politico made his quid pro quo deal with in 1991 and first identified in the CONSERVERY'S CHALLENGE between days 33 and 36, is being re-examined to examine the facts, to be sure that the appropriate parties are identified, as follows: Player # 1 - my Sister, on the same the window was shot through in circa 1992/93 informed me that the family residence at Chapel Street was being sold and she needed my input to sign off on the paperwork. This did not make any sense because my name was never on the Chapel Street, St. Peter, Barbados residence (since it was in my father’s name) and why in turn would a signature of any type be needed from, me. I never received the said paperwork. When She was later questioned about this, she informed me that a former schoolmate of mine Adrian King purchased it and the matter ended there. While I had received a package containing her x-rays in 1991, the more important paperwork for the sale of the family residence was never seen. My father had left the residence to my sister in its entirety and the need for a signature was nonsense. Furthermore, my father had left an alternate (0.5-acre) property to be divided between my brother and I, where my mother in later years had turned into her fruit and vegetable garden. Therefore, when the plans for a new government Highway landed directly through this property it was sold/taken over for this purpose and the proceeds divided between my brother and I. This is where my down payment for the Branford, CT condo in 1983 originated mainly. In reflecting back on these events, it would appear that this pretext sale of the family residence was a ruse to provide a con artist with a link to my family history and in a manner of speaking cover-up the actual event in question and the source of my down payment in Branford, by pretending that the sale of the family residence somehow provided a con artist (who according to news reports had been in this Country/State since 1953 and working for the same since 1957) with a legitimate conection to my heritage. The lengths “Society’s” types go to cover over historical events when the cooperation with family members are either “bribed” or coerced into providing cover to a fraud with “made-up” heritage, all with the assistance of a then Opportunistic aspiring Politico. Player # 2 - the Opportunistic Politico (with a penchant for hiding behind others), only known because of the delivery date on the x-rays received in 1991. However, once “elected” he did visit the land of my birth in (circa) 1995 (for reasons unknown). He has steadfastly ever since this deal-making days, sworn to the fact that a Con Artist is “legitimately” James F. Brazant, when such is a practical impossibility, since he was already in the USA by another name he still uses in spite of the additional "virtual" Ohio connection introduced to provide cover for the difference in years (probably an English import in search of an identity, seeing all the other English connections involved in this identity debacle - see the post IDENTITY FREE-FOR-ALL), and so the plot thickens. Player # 3 - the Unknown Deal-Maker, with connection to Vermont (who would have been desirous for the uncouth behavior of the errant executive scenario to go away). This individual also will be described as having major connection to this State to the extent to ensure that important actions can take place as needed, probably a politico and in 1991 most likely an individual with a Red party label but known for the ability to be on both sides of the aisle (especially since the Party in power at that time both at the Federal and State levels here was of the “Red” party variety and probably connected to the Utility industry) and possessing a "love" for those with "two faces". Therefore what has been determined so far about this “Wheeler-Dealer” is this: most likely a Politico, with a red Party label, connected to the utility industry with connection to both Federal and State politics. There are not that many individuals who can fit this description, with the arrogance to think that He [since there have never been elected female politicos to either Federal (Congressional) or State (gubernatorial) levels in this State ever] could deal away another’s identity in this trivial a manner. The Exposure of this “sneaky” individual will be revealed in due course and my apology to any individual who may have been mischaracterized as being complicit in this saga in an incorrect manner.  

NETWORKING TO IMPLEMENT ID SWITCHING FRAUD - UPDATED

This post is being updated to include actual examples (see below photos) corroborating deliberate networking intent to implement identity location switching, since knowledge of the correct mailing address here at 8263 140th Ave, Olin, IA was clearly known by the Entity in question.

 

When “Society’s” types are bent on implementing identity switching, there are myriads of avenues for them to pursue their schemes. For example, for a duration in the 2005/06 timeframe (coinciding in my opinion with the implementing of a fraud with “two faces”) into my identity; there were a host of mailings to this address here at 8263, 140^th Ave, Olin, IA 52320 with my name, all with a subtle switch in the mailing address here but intended to provide some “Society’s”type with an IDENTITY CRUTCH based on this address for his legitimacy (see the post IDENTITY CRUTCHES). The mailings all included the following address form: James (F.) Brazant, 8263 140^thAve, Olin, OH 52320, even when the participant all were previously aware of the correct address (see below photos, which are just selected excerpts).

These examples all indicate that some “two faced” fraud was (and probably still is) using this address and my identity to connect to OHIO subtly, when no such connection exists. This is how “Society’s” types, using another’s identity for cover, obtain “legitimacy” through their widespread networking caability. To determine whom this fraud is, a search should be made for any individual who has been openly using a name that links to Ohio, and the fraud will be exposed (see THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY’S“VIRTUAL” SOCIETY).
My conclusion is this, any individual using a name (or label) connecting to the politics in Ohio and hiding in any of my email addresses is the guilty impostor obviously with “two faces”. This impostor should be exposed in order that my business can move on as desired over the objections of those involved in the covering-up of the events from years ago (see the post IDENTITY SWITCHING OVER THE YEARS COMPACTED FOR THE RECORD).

NETWORKING TO IMPLEMENT ID SWITCHING FRAUD

When “Society’s” types are bent on implementing identity switching, there are myriads of avenues for them to pursue their schemes. For example, for a duration in the 2005/06 timeframe (coinciding in my opinion with the implementing of a fraud with “two faces”) into my identity; there were a host of mailings to this address here at 8263, 140^th Ave, Olin, IA 52320 with my name, all with a subtle switch in the mailing address here but intended to provide some “Society’s” type with an IDENTITY CRUTCH based on this address for his legitimacy (see the post IDENTITY CRUTCHES) . The mailings all included the following address form: James (F.) Brazant, 8263 140^th Ave, Olin, OH 52320, even when the participant all were previously aware of the correct address (see below photos, which are just selected excerpts).

 

 

These examples all indicate that some “two faced” fraud was (and probably still is) using this address and my identity to connect to OHIO subtly, when no such connection exists. This is how “Society’s” types, using another’s identity for cover, obtain “legitimacy” through their widespread networking caability. To determine whom this fraud is, a search should be made for any individual who has been openly using a name that links to Ohio, and the fraud will be exposed (see THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY’S“VIRTUAL” SOCIETY).
My conclusion is this, any individual using a name (or label) connecting to the politics in Ohio and hiding in any of my email addresses is the guilty impostor obviously with “two faces”. This impostor should be exposed in order that my business can move on as desired over the objections of those involved in the covering-up of the events from years ago (see the post IDENTITY SWITCHING OVER THE YEARS COMPACTED FOR THE RECORD).

 

THE ELECTION IN SUMMATION

In summary, the “epithet” to be written about this election was more about the attempt at vindicating some action of the “Society” and in my opinion specifically some quid pro quo thing that an Opportunistic Supporter carried out to justify “two faced” types (and as a result, who CAN’T leave the politico scene) because the “Society” made sure that the “success” of this re-election could not be written without this individual being out front and center. All that can be stated in retrospect is that it doesn’t pay to make quid pro quo deals for achieving any politico office because it imperils your future to constantly be working overtime along with your Types to vindicate actions that in turn make such reliant on for “dear life” via their “Society’s” type brand of “legitimacy”, especially when the “ghosts” of what was enacted in secret comes back to “haunt” years later, who wants to live in this fashion? ONE SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO RELY ON ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, WHETHER, MOGUL, TITAN, ARBITER OF “THRUTH” OR OPPORTUNISTIC SUPPORTER FOR “EASILY OBTAINED” “LEGITIMACY”, but because the “Constitution“ only actually states in Article IV that “the citizens of each Sate shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States”; about the rights of individuals, such can be carried out, in my opinion. However, I have come to the conclusion that my unique position is centered in fact that since I have chosen not to pursue citizenship, because of my inability to justify disavowing the Country of my birth, simply by the “wave” my hand and in this manner place allegiance in another even though this did not prevent me from participating in and/or giving back, to the communities where I resided in the Country of my residence by choice when in a position to do so. Even though “Society’s types have made it their business to attempt to take that choice away from me I still give back in another manner via this Blog, where none have any editorial overseeing “backdoor” rights regardless of what evidence they claim to possess in this regard (see the CONSERVERY AUTHORIZATION Page).
Therefore, it would appear that if one State (with a name that sound like “Vicepont”, since they are big lottery players there), decided to make an individual a non entity [to cover up the conduct in the matter of an unprofessional executive- see the post THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION] and in a quid pro quo deal make the continuance of this status with another State, a certainty, (which included an Opportunistic Politico in 1991); I a non-citizen, have little recourse against such powers simply because in this matter, seeking recourse through the Constitution results in a “gray” area; that is why, even those with “fake” citizenship, obtained at the expense of others have more rights than I, because the Constitution does uphold the rights of citizens, even fake citizenry along with other “Society’s” types and Supporters who are actually “two faced” citizens in their Country. When any election cements these undertakings, the process has truly been ravished by conditions, which the Founders of this Country did not truly envision, unmitigated greed by those citizens who would hide behind the cloak of the Constitution, to enact unconscionable acts against others simply because the matter in the case of “legitimate” non citizens choosing by conscience to retain this status was not clearly envisioned and/or addressed. It should not be any cause for surprise that “gridlock” in the “Halls of Power” exists today, because of those who manipulate this scenario to pursue their objectives, at the expense of others, using the legislative process (at all levels) as their cover to carry on their merry way exploiting such conditions with their thinking all “they” have to do is win another election to keep up our brand of “legitimacy” up for another four (4) years, just remember their motto is “as long as in the end it works out, then the means are all worth it, because it can covered up down the road” (hopefully, as long as an Opportunistic Politico is around, who thinks he is invincible). 

THE CRIMES OF “SOCIETY’S” TYPES BEING COVERED-UP - UPDATED 4/11/2013

This post summarizes the events that occurred at a minimum, which are being taken lightly by many “Society’s” types, but here are the facts that are being or have been covered up, as follows:

1. as documented in GIVING “LIFE” THE OLD FASHIONED WAY - UPDATED TO INCLUDE AN EXAMPLE OF CONSISTENCY: FEDERAL MAIL FRAUD (for all involved, since inside assistance was obviously obtained in the carrying out of this crime) - A FELONY
2. as documented in ON-GOING COVER-UP OF MISREPRESENTATION/FRAUD AND ITS SYMPTOMS in addition to THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF A“VIRTUAL” IDENTITY as well as IDENTITY FREE FOR ALL - IDENTITY THEFT - A FELONY
3. as documented in THE TIME HAS COME - ATTEMPTED HARASSMENT/INTIMIDATION - A FELONY
4. as documented in ANOTHER REASON FOR EXCLUDING LOCATIONS FROM CONSIDERATION - WIRE FRAUD - A FELONY
5. as documented in TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF REASONS FOR EXCLUSION OF LOCATION(S) FROM CONSIDERATION - ACCIDENT STAGING (OR ATTEMPTED MURDER USING A VOLKSWAGEN JETTA AS THE WEAPON) - A FELONY
6. as documented CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 THROUGH2005, ARBITRARILY - ALTERING FINANCIAL RECORDS TO SUPPORT IDENTITY SWITCHING/FRAUD - A FELONY
7. as documented in JUDGING BY THE COVER ALONE - A MISTAKE ALWAYS - UPDATED - POTENTIAL IDENTITY SWITCHING/THEFT & COVER-UP - A FELONY
8. as documented in A LESSON IN 21ST CENTURY BANKING - AND HOW TO BOUNCE OFF AN INDIVIDUAL FOR LEGITIMACY AND IMPRISON FINANCIALLY/SIMULTANEOUSLY - CHECK FRAUD TO SUPPORT IDENTITY SWITCHING/THEFT  - A FELONY and
9. as documented in MISREPRESENTATION DEFINED (FOR THE RECORD) - AMENDED - TAX FRAUD - A FELONY

 
The above is a clear demonstration of the systemic influence exerted by those “Society’s” types with a vested interest in the status quo, to ensure that the above felony actions can be carried out and no consequences will result. However, since the example was set from the start when the investigation into the window here at 8263 140^th Ave, being shot through around 1993 and the “evidence” removed from the scene while being away for a very short duration (approximately twenty to twenty-five minutes), was dropped when the Sheriff resigned suddenly after a brutal murder was committed in his hometown. With such a “statement” being made, all involved could feel “free” to implement anything involving CRIMES committed against me as documented and consequences will not take place. OH FOR “REAL” CHANGE.

WHEN AN “ACCIDENT” IS NOT REALLY AN “ACCIDENT”

This update to the post “WHEN IS AN “ACCIDENT” NOT REALLY AN “ACCIDENT”?”, focuses on taxes and specifically why would “Society’s” types feel comfortable stealing a State Income tax refund check but not the Federal Income tax refund check in an attempt to find answers to these “looming” questions (see the below photos) for some measure of clarity to that infamous

 

 

Federal Tax Returns Mailed on 2/11/2012



 

Federal Income Tax Return Refund Check Received on 4/16/2012 (same date as my Divorce Decree)



event. The below photo shows the process used for filing my State Taxes only since

 

my Federal taxes had been filed earlier as the below photo shows. The notable thing about my taxes is that my older daughter is not included on my taxes when filing was carried out and has not been included since turning 18 (whenever filing was carried out). There are many unanswered questions in the stealing of this tax refund Check (see below photo), and since

 

this matter is of interest to me, my investigation is being enacted to find clues and or answers. The first question is how can State Refund Check # 20312563 be stolen by anyone who was clearly incapable (since possessing “two faces” – one public and another private does not allow for visiting any business and carrying out any transaction), of being in anyway associated with the filing of the taxes in the first place, (as the previous photo documents that the filing of the State of IA income Tax Returns, which resulted in the Refund in the amount of was paid for by me at Freedom Tax Preparation’s Office )? I guess there is more to Tax Freedom than meets the “eye”. The next question of interest is why was Federal Tax Refund Check # 358 22943109 not stolen? Maybe one explanation lies in the fact that the tax preparation was carried out by me personally and not paid for as was carried out for the State Tax Returns [the main reason for seeking outside assistance was due to the fact that my Daughter had not filed prior to her accident and on her release from the Ankeny, IA facility, I took steps to ensure that her taxes were filed with their complications involved in her “questionable” Scholarship she received from Principle Financial, which I did not want to be associated with in anyway].

The filing of my Federal Taxes introduced complications for some “Society’s” type who may have been filing fraudulent (or garbage) taxes, which on the last occasion I checked was a felony, using my daughter as his tax filing cover [see the post AN ABBREVIATED LISTING OF THE SIGNS THAT YOU (“SOCIETY’S” TYPES) HAVE BECOME IMPRISONED IN ANOTHER’SIDENTITY - UPDATED]. These are the complications introduced, first as previously mentioned, the oldest of my two daughters has not been included on any tax returns filed (when such were carried out), since she turned 18, and this “two faced” type possibly does. The second complication lies in the fact that my younger daughter is the only “legitimate” dependent filed on my tax returns and especially since she still lives at the Olin, residence, where my older daughter had not resided since 2007, after moving to Cedar Rapids to be closer to her then place of employment. The complication herein is this, how can this discrepancy be reconciled if filing fraudulent taxes? I cannot prove this with any degree of certainty but in my opinion any method that resulted in her being back at the Olin residence would resolve the questions, period. All that can be stated is what occurred since my Federal taxes were filed on February 11, 2012.
On March 4, 2012 the oldest of my two daughters was involved in the “accident”, which is the focus of the previous post “WHEN IS AN “ACCIDENT” NOT REALLY AN “ACCIDENT”?”. She was hospitalized for that “accident” that coincidentally involved “traumatic brain injury” and was released to a Long-Term care facility for treating such injuries on March 21, 2012, where she stayed until April 20, 2012 (see the included photo below). My older daughter being “strong

Note the Account # in this Excerpt from the Treatment Facility BRA DAN 12 64 (or 3 3 12 64)!

willed” and accustomed to being on her own and who does not like taking recommendations from anyone, was  released from the Long Term Facility and (much slower than her previously self) returned to her campus apartment on April 29, 2012 after staying at the Olin residence for a week at best. However, in July a combination of the “pressures” associated with her injuries and living on her own, working while attending school proved to be a bit much and she entered another Medical facility for a short time and was released and returned here to the Olin family residence on July 29, 2012 and moved completely out of her School apartment around the same time where she has remained since.

The complication, now (in the mind of some “Society’s” type) has now been resolved, with my oldest daughter back at the residence her at 8263 140^th Ave, Olin, IA 52320-7708. Was this a long-range plan to resolve the complication of some “Society’s” type filing fraudulent tax returns ever since Danielle entered the State in 1991, (see included photo below) with a need to

Mailing Received Seven (7) Months After Relocating to IA Announcing her Connection to Some "Two Faced" type from IA   

connect to Connecticut and specifically Still Hill Road, Hamden her birthplace? I can’t answer to any degree of certainty, but I have learned over the years that what appears to be coincidental usually is not, and a scenario that just so happens to address the tax filing complications of a Felony Tax Filer is too much for to accept (especially where State Sponsored ID Theft) is on display as shown in the prior posting. The only thing left is the receipt of another check from the conveniently re-election delayed Class Action Suit to piece this all together and over-ride the receipt of the previous check by me only on this occasion, my oldest Daughter will be at the Olin residence (I will not receive this check after the re-election) and the Tax Filing complication will be resolved. Who knows this scenario may even end up being part of a multi-faceted quilt! This sequence of events definitely would explain why any individual(s) would be comfortable stealing a State tax return check, not the Federal Check (because that would be too obvious) and the answer lies in the above discourse especially if the entangled “quilt” of various “two faced” “Society’s” types are depended on it for legitimacy - connect the dots…!

JUDGING BY THE COVER ALONE - A MISTAKE ALWAYS - UPDATED

 

This post JUDGING BY THE COVER ALONE - A MISTAKE ALWAYS is being updated to include specific related examples. To most today in our made for television “society”, if it appears to be, it is assumed to be just that. However, making major decisions based on what soothes is never good policy; whether its for a “big ticket” item or some other selection or choice between two, it should never be made because what appears to be an appealing or soothing type product is usually not what it’s presented to be. For example, given the choice what appears to be a “made for TV” alternative in the choice between two, if a cross-sectional view is gained, may in fact turn out to be a completely crude quilt held together by: 1) layers of “woolen” type complicated “virtual” links, 2) unrealistic connections and 3) unmet production target outputs. Furthermore, the habit of frogs is a useful case in point, which contains a very relevant application. If the habit of these amphibians are examined, much can be learned as follows; if frogs are placed in a container of hot water, they would immediately jump to safety but on the other hand, if placed in lukewarm (or soothing water) and the temperature of the water is gradually increased to the same hot condition as used previously, the frog would be unable to jump to safety having been misled by the surrounding conditions. In this scenario the “soothing” water conditions can be described as the frog’s “Trojan Horse” with its cleverly concealed cargo designed to trick the astute frog that hot water is not the desired objective.

Now if the other alternative is considered, which is comprised of a large bundle of clearly visible blossoms of the type of multi-faceted collection from among those whom our society may label, for lack of fully understanding; the tendency may be to select the former because only the “made for television” side is seen.

Similarly, words in a comment to a post made earlier by me to the effect that “who really knows what is hunkering beneath that operation” were chosen very carefully and should never be assumed to convey something other than what was meant, that is why determining through discovery what is being conveyed is so very important. Unearthing the facts involves finding out exactly what is being conveyed before forming opinions, a practice not employed by those whose object is typically to steer others in a specific direction chosen by them in an effort to demonstrate that “they have nothing to hide”. This business model appears to perfectly fit the lifestyle of a former Engineering (work) colleague and his spouse ideally. Therefore to find this lifestyle turned into a business and by another led me to the conclusion made, wondering aloud, where did the idea originate? This is due to the fact that I have learned over the years from experience not to believe in coincidences and knowing the penchant for some with “two faces” to assume the history of others in unimaginable ways and (with the availability of a pending IDENTITY CRUTCH, their on-going Class Action Suit having been recast until a more opportune “favorable” election season at stake), in an effort to demonstrate legitimacy including selected acquaintances, and pilfer ideas along the way; the previously described scenario and its potential was not being overlooked.

In addition, I am also aware of an unpretentious lady who if placed in the same situation as outlined in the description above between the two alternatives may appear at first glance to be the type of individual who would not be chosen by participants at large by the “Society’s” Moguls and other powers that be, to even allow her to enter the “finals”; but if given the appropriate opportunity and connections, would rise to the occasion.

In conclusion, it must be emphasized that decisions made on the basis of assuming what is soothing and/or is being conveyed by the cover alone is never good policy, as the included example clearly demonstrated. Knowledgeable inquiries and or observation should always be made to determine what is “really” being conveyed, it is the ONLY respectful course to chart regardless of the chorus of “Society’s” types who are usually disrespectful and loud in their opposition to anything or anyone who upsets their neatly packaged perpetual wealth-generating “virtual” world. NEVER JUDGE BY THE COVER ALONE, ALWAYS TRY TO TAKE A LOOK INSIDE, EVEN IF BY THE UNSPOKEN DETAILS CONVEYED THAT CAN “SAY” A GREAT DEAL MORE THAN WHAT IS DESIRED TO BE PROJECTED.