ADDENDUM TO SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING "VIRTUAL" IDENTITIES - UPDATED

This was intended to be a Comment to the post SUMMARY OF HIDDEN DANGERS/UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING "VIRTUAL IDENTITIES"- UPDATED, but it was added as an update instead.
The significance of my brother Paul and sister June switching birth records is no small matter [if such occurred for him to be the older of the two and by so doing give identity frauds cover to ease their way into the birth records of my mother and father, who had two (2) girls (one a still birth) before their first son was born, Paul in 1950, and in any event they had no children before 1947 - see ANOTHER UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF HAVING A “VIRTUAL” IDENTITY]; because records of all type would have to be covered up in many places. For example since she June worked for Barclay's Bank Barbados for approximately twenty (20) years after returning to Barbados from attending business School in New York in 1968 until the time of her early retirement ultimately due to her vehicle accident that occurred in the mid 80s, (see photo below). These records would have to

Norville was my Sister June's Marriage Title, she was Married in Circa 1976 -This is one of the Money Transfers to me While Attending Pratt. - There is NO OTHER Female Included only My Sister and the transfer of Funds Definitely Did NOT Include Any Other Male Apart From me, Whether or not she Changed Her Birth Records With My Brother to Support ID Fraud.

be somehow made to go away. Could it be that the $10 billion investment in Barclay's Bank from the Sovereign funds of an Asian country shortly before the financial meltdown would have played any part in such a “whitewash”?

HOW IS THE MEMORABILIA OF YOUR QUALIFICATIONS DETERMINED - UPDATED?

This monthly theme for August is being UPDATED TO ADD APPLICABLE LINKS and introduced early since many things can be imitated, duplicated, "spoofed" or manipulated and a different approach than first envisioned was determined to be required for this subject, which will be approached from the point-of-view of a closer examination of the word QUALIFICATIONS itself, in an attempt to reveal its essential qualities, as follows:

• (Q)UESTION - all things instead of simply accepting without thoughtful inquiry,

• (U)NIQUE - possessor of skills where hiding behind others is not practiced,

• (A)CTION - seeks answers by prodding until satisfaction is obtained,

• (L)ASTING - skills gained remain even if interrupted and will be displayed (see GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE),

• (I)DEAL - will always be the objective, when skills are put into practice,

• (F)ACTS - will be the objective when faced with any task,

• (I)LLUMINATION - will be the desired path to fill in the "dark or blank" spaces,

• (C)ANDIDNESS - will definitely be on display when skills are possessed because the need to take from others to build up what is lacking in such individuals is not the main objective. Those without "real" skills are in complete contrast regarding this main trait,

• (A)BLE - to achieve and/or find an avenue to excel in spite of obstacles/challenges, which is in contrast to those who are not in possession of the skills claimed by them,

• (T)ACTFULLNESS - will be a characteristic of the skilled, even though this may be a trait lost in our "self-centered Society", where gain at the expense of others is rewarded, as such types are seen as doing anything to ensure the bottom line. These types of individuals are in turn propped up by their "Society" as they are taught to display disrespect for the RIGHTS (see Comment # 1 From 7/2/2012 on the COMMENTS Page), PROPERTY (see Comment # 3 From 6/28/2012 on the COMMENTS Page) and PERSONAL AFFAIRS of others (see NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK); while the skilled are forced to "play" sub roles [see ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED,

• (I)NFORMATION STEWARDSHIP - is a trait possessed by the skilled, this does not include ordering subscriptions and memberships for groups (in fictitious identities) for appearance ONLY purposes and as a "mark" of social status and to justify the illegal finances accumulated that cannot be otherwise justified,

• (O)BSERVANT- of practices utilized in the field of skill and reflected accordingly,

• (N)ECESSARY- investigation will be the course followed by the skilled as opposed to the bottom line primary focus of the unskilled. However, the skilled will fine a path to balance these two competing objectives,

• (S)PECIAL - qualities will always distinguish the skilled because their uniqueness isn't purchased, but rather an inherent characteristic possessed regardless of the circumstances, whether exalted or humble in, which they find themselves. The unskilled cannot exist apart from flashing financial capability as a "mark" of their legitimacy.

This evaluation has shown that qualifications can be compared to a badge carried with "magnificence" such that when faced with various situations, such as where impromptu questions are required, pre-screening does not have to be an absolute must due to lack of skills and/or in the unlikely event that a teleprompter failure occurs, total chaos doesn’t result. On the other hand,“mouthers” aren’t being endorsed because such individuals can talk their way out of any situation without really saying anything. Only when these qualities are perfectly on display regardless of the overriding situation, can the inherent representative skills be said to be an accurate depiction of the skill set being postulated and those to whom the badge belongs will “shine” regardless of the circumstances in, which they find themselves.

HOW IS THE MEMORABILIA OF YOUR QUALIFICATIONS DETERMINED?

This monthly theme for August is being introduce early since many things can be imitated, duplicated, "spoofed" or manipulated and a different approach than first envisioned was determined to be required for this subject, which will be approached from the point-of-view of a closer examination of the word QUALIFICATIONS itself, in an attempt to reveal its essential qualities, as follows:

• (Q)UESTION  - all things instead of simply accepting without thoughtful inquiry,

• (U)NIQUE - possessor of skills where hiding behind others is not practiced,

• (A)CTION - seeks answers by prodding until satisfaction is obtained,

• (L)ASTING - skills gained remain even if interrupted and will be displayed (see GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE),

• (I)DEAL - will always be the objective, when skills are put into practice,

• (F)ACTS - will be the objective when faced with any task,

• (I)LLUMINATION - will be the desired path to fill in the "dark or blank" spaces,

• (C)ANDIDNESS - will definitely be on display when skills are possessed because the need to take from others to build up what is lacking in such individuals is not the main objective. Those without "real" skills are in complete contrast regarding this main trait,

• (A)BLE - to achieve and/or find an avenue to excel in spite of obstacles/challenges, which is in contrast to those who are not in possession of the skills claimed by them,

• (T)ACTFULLNESS - will be a characteristic of the skilled, even though this may be a trait lost in our "self-centered Society", where gain at the expense of others is rewarded, as such types are seen as doing anything to ensure the bottom line. These types of individuals are in turn propped up by their "Society" as they are taught to display disrespect for the rights, property and personal affairs of others; while the skilled are forced to "play" sub roles [see ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED,

• (I)NFORMATION STEWARDSHIP - is a trait possessed by the skilled, this does not include ordering subscriptions and memberships for groups (in fictitious identities) for appearance ONLY purposes and as a "mark" of social status and to justify the illegal finances accumulated that cannot be otherwise justified,

• (O)BSERVANT - of practices utilized in the field of skill and reflected accordingly,

• (N)ECESSARY - investigation will be the course followed by the skilled as opposed to the bottom line primary focus of the unskilled. However, the skilled will fine a path to balance these two competing objectives,

• (S)PECIAL - qualities will always distinguish the skilled because their uniqueness isn't purchased, but rather an inherent characteristic possessed regardless of the circumstances, whether exalted or humble in, which they find themselves. The unskilled cannot exist apart from flashing financial capability as a "mark" of their legitimacy. 

This evaluation has shown that qualifications can be compared to a badge carried with "magnificence" such that when faced with various situations, such as where impromptu questions are required, pre-screening does not have to be an absolute must due to lack of skills and/or in the unlikely event that a teleprompter failure occurs, total chaos doesn’t result. On the other hand, “mouthers” aren’t being endorsed because such individuals can talk their way out of any situation without really saying anything. Only when these qualities are perfectly on display regardless of the overriding situation, can the inherent representative skills be said to be an accurate depiction of the skill set being postulated and those to whom the badge belongs will “shine” regardless of the circumstances in, which they find themselves.

ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED - UUPDATED

This post is being updated to include details about my Position in Environmental Qualification described in the description from the SPECIAL PURPOSE page included below under the subtopic ADDENDUM TO MY POSITION ON SPECIAL DAYS.

Honda, please do not take sides in a matter that you do NOT fully understand based on what entities/organizations/individuals “with an agenda told you, no matter their status”, just keep an open mind, when the below communication was made available to your Organization

Letter to HMC of 4/25/2011 - Part of Correspondence

and Embassy at a time of great difficulty in your Country, it was out of

Part of Follow-up Explanatory Communication to Japan Embassy - However, I am no Longer Involved with My Youngest Daughter's Home Schooled Education Activities as Stated in that Fax

respect and much concern, Please do not make me loose that respect “REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOUR ORGANIZATION WAS TOLD BY OTHERS WITH THEIR AGENDA” that you may not be completely aware of. All I am asking you to do is think, irrespective of what you were told by others, [how could I an individual without the support of those multi conglomerate entities with deep pockets and the agenda you may not fully understand be in possession of my historical information that others are now claiming as their own (behind my back) after I was hired, worked for ten (10) years cleaning up their files in an area in, which the same Entity who courted you Organization’s support was fined #50,000.00 twice in the late 1980s to early the early 1990s and then laid me off when their objective was achieved – their files cleaned and at the time unknown to me, identity transfer enacted], regardless of the elevations/awards they may give your vehicles (with an expectation of quid pro quo support because I took the time to communicate with you Country historically beginning in 2007, and before that with the State of Hawaii beginning in 1999, check with your embassy in DC and the State even though others were busy taking credit for all the activities that were carried out at the time, which I did not understand at that time, see the below photos). The main reason, why these “Society”individuals

Part of Communication with State of Hawaii Beginning in 1998/1999 When the local Paper was Ordered by my now ex Spouse at My Recommendation

courted your Organization’s support is precisely because of the historical significance of my actions in communicating with your Country and the State of Hawaii as indicated above, and above all (“beware of political types regardless of status who speak with forked tongue, also with an agenda”).Your vehicles can stand on their own with or without the titles the “Society”gave them expecting your Organization to take sides in a matter that you may not fully understand. THANK YOU FOR NOT TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT AND TAKE SIDES IN A VERY COMPLICATED MATTER (with its roots in Vermont – see the series of posts on the subject entitled THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION - UPDATED).

ADDENDUM TO MY POSITION ON SPECIAL DAYS

My position as indicated in the subject was not a secret, even in my workplace, which could be a challenge if not handled with diplomacy. For example, a few years after being promoted to the position of EQ Group Leader, in 1994, my carefully worded position was handled in the manner shown in the Email to a notable cast of characters (see Email to the group of executives on the chosen list of 12/27/1994 included below).

 

 

EQ Program Description as well as Emails of 12/27/94 and 12/18/1998

To digress, EQ is an abbreviation for Environmental Qualification (described above), which was a direct outcome of the aftermath of the 3-Mile Island disaster. Its purpose is to ensure that electrical equipment required to function during (postulated)accident conditions could operate to mitigate the accident conditions as required. I was hired for this position because the Company (see hiring details summary included below). 

had been fined twice in the late 1980’s/1990 to the tune of $50,000.00/fine, due to ineffective compliance. I was hired into that role in 1991 as a Design Engineer (N5), was promoted to N6 after my first evaluation after six (6) months and later to Group Leader of a dedicated EQ Group in 1992. I became the Plant contact person for EQ all the years I remained with the Company until the time of my layoff in 2002. However, it was left in a far better shape than I found it in 1991, such that previously hidden critical details important for Licensing were adequately address during my tenure. They were researched, brought to light and left in such a manner that anyone could pick up the Program and carry it on, (which is ultimately what management wanted, instead of having to pay an engineer’s salary to an individual to maintain it.)

The positions of the individuals on that email list shown in the above top insert can be determined from the Company’s 1996 Annual Report excerpts included below.

  

IN KEEPING WITH MY POSITION NOT TO MAINTAIN OR SUPPORT ANYONE/ENTITY IN PART RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANGLING OF MY IDENTITY ON THE PAGES OF THESE BLOGS IN A MANNER THAT PROMOTES THEM, THE APPLICABLE PHOTOS WERE REMOVED.





Mr. Root, especially (IF STILL ALIVE, IS ALL TOO WELL AWARE OF WHO THE “REAL” JAMES F. BRAZANT IS, BECAUSE OF THE SUB ROLES HE ALWAYS HAD TO “PLAY” POLITICALLY FOR THE COMPANY & INDIVIDUAL(S) WHO ONLY KNOW HOW TO HIDE BEHIND OTHERS (see below for an excerpt from the above file).

IN KEEPING WITH MY POSITION NOT TO MAINTAIN OR SUPPORT ANYONE/ENTITY IN PART RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANGLING OF MY IDENTITY ON THE PAGES OF THESE BLOGS IN A MANNER THAT PROMOTES THEM, THE APPLICABLE LISTING WAS REMOVED.
 



Even after the 1994 “reorganization” by the Mr. John Franz, which eliminated the EQ Group, my position on such days did not change as the 1998 Email to the Admin Secretary of December 18, 1998 indicates (shown in top insert). As pointed out in my Posting on this subject of January 28, 2012, EVEN THOUGH IT (MY POSITION), HAS BEEN MODIFIED SOMEWHAT; I DO MAINTAIN THE GENERAL REASONING FOR THIS POSITION (ON SPECIAL DAYS) AS DESCRIBED EARLIER.

Even after the 1994 “reorganization” by the Mr. John Franz, which eliminated the EQ Group, my position on such days did not change as the 1998 Email to the Admin Secretary of December 18, 1998 indicates (shown in top insert). As pointed out in my Posting on this subject of January 28, 2012, EVEN THOUGH IT (MY POSITION), HAS BEEN MODIFIED SOMEWHAT; I DO MAINTAIN THE GENERAL REASONING FOR THIS POSITION (ON SPECIAL DAYS) AS DESCRIBED EARLIER.

REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATED

Honda, please do not take sides in a matter that you do NOT fully understand based on what entities/organizations/individuals “with an agenda told you, no matter their status”, just keep an open mind, when the below communication was made available to your Organization

Letter to HMC of 4/25/2011 - Part of Correspondence

and Embassy at a time of great difficulty in your Country, it was out of  

Part of Follow-up Explanatory Communication to Japan Embassy - However, I am no Longer Involved with My Youngest Daughter's Home Schooled Education Activities as Stated in that Fax 

respect and much concern, Please do not make me loose that respect “REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOUR ORGANIZATION WAS TOLD BY OTHERS WITH THEIR AGENDA” that you may not be completely aware of. All I am asking you to do is think, irrespective of what you were told by others, [how could I an individual without the support of those multi conglomerate entities with deep pockets and the agenda you may not fully understand be in possession of my historical information that others are now claiming as their own (behind my back) after I was hired, worked for ten (10) years cleaning up their files in an area in, which the same Entity who courted you Organization’s support was fined #50,000.00 twice in the late 1980s to early the early 1990s and then laid me off when their objective was achieved – their files cleaned and at the time unknown to me, identity transfer enacted], regardless of the elevations/awards they may give your vehicles (with an expectation of quid pro quo support because I took the time to communicate with you Country historically beginning in 2007, and before that with the State of Hawaii beginning in 1999, check with you embassy in DC and the State even though others were busy taking credit for all my activities which, at the time, I did not understand, see the below photos). The main reason, why these “Society” individuals

Part of Communication with State of Hawaii Beginnng in 1998/1999 When the local Paper was Ordered by my now ex Spouse at My Recommendation 

courted your Organization’s support is precisely because of the historical significance of my actions in communicating with your Country and the State of Hawaii as indicated above, and above all (“beware of political types regardless of status who speak with forked tongue, also with an agenda”). Your vehicles can stand on their own with or without the titles the “Society” gave them expecting your Organization to take sides in a matter that you may not fully understand.  THANK YOU FOR NOT TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT AND TAKE SIDES IN A VERY COMPLICATED MATTER (with its roots in Vermont – see the series of posts on the subject entitled THE COVER-UP IS MORE COSTLY THAN THE ORIGINAL ACTION - UPDATED).

RESTRICTING AND EXCLUDING

This theme/topic for the month of July contains some important and very current material, therefore its introduction, a few days early is warranted. How is it possible in an “open and free” country in, which the democratic processes are “clearly” on display, for the “virtuals” and their supporters (to be referred to in the future simply as the “Society”), to control the various avenues in place for achieving higher office? The answer to that question is the subject of this post, namely the process has to be controlled and restricted in order that those who are not part of the “Society” are excluded. The obvious question that follows is; how can this be done with all the methods to be elected “open” for all to see? A once idealistic younger Politician, before he too became embroiled in the same process he characterized in the form of his current problems said words to this effect on his earliest attempt at higher office, “the same people are elected repeatedly”. This was a younger former US Senator John Edwards. He certainly did not mean that remark to be taken literally, because the same individuals are not elected on each occasion, but symbolically they are.
There are numerous loopholes in the process via, which those who are not the desired candidates of the “Society” can be restricted and/or excluded from achieving the ultimate prize, as follows. The primary method for achieving this desired outcome is to cutoff access to campaign funds, without, which the typical candidate’s chances of success are non-existent. Secondly in instances where it’s deemed necessary, tarnishing with scandal is utilized. These “dirty tricks” are used to attack the character of the opposing candidate in an attempt to define the individual. Alternately, the “Society” may attempt to ensure that the nominee is either paired with one of the “Society’s” vast network of running mates or in some cases use a “spouse/partner” with connections to the “Society” to sabotage any legitimate chance the candidate has for success. Finally, just in case a player who is not of the typical grouping of those who normally run for this office, with a chance for success is in the unique position of being within an arms length away from victory as the Party’s nominee, all the stops are pulled to restrict the individual using deceptively “speck-sized” insinuations that are about as meaningful as an “uninvited, outsider” masquerading as an “invited” guest, being discovered at the President’s Ball. Additionally, not leaving things to chance and always with a backup plan, Agents of the Society are “planted” as Staffers among the candidate’s help/assistants to ensure that the candidate’s chances are narrowed sufficiently such that in a very close contest, it will make the difference between being selected or being forced to withdraw. 
With the various methods in their “Playbook” (see WHO IS (ARE) THE "REAL" OWNERS OF THE NO 37 "VIRTUAL" PLAYBOOK?), there is no chance for the normally unprepared candidate to succeed, because the entire financial “pyramid” operating structure of the “Society” is at stake (see the post GIVING PROPER CREDIT WHERE IT’S DUE); therefore considerable resources are exerted in the cause of ensuring that only their candidates or those whom can be controlled by one means or anther are eventually elected by restricting and excluding all others along the way. However, there is “real” hope for CHANGE - A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.

ADDENDUM TO PROPERTY UPDATE DETAIL

This is an update to the previous post PROPERTY UPDATE DETAIL TO DOCUMENT FOR THE RECORD THAT my email account/address jbrazant@aol.com IS NO LONGER USED BY ME AND HAS NOT BEEN WELL PAST THE DURATION FOR NON USED ACCOUNTS TO BE DEACITVATED (according to the policy of AOL). Therefore, I am not responsible for any current use by anyone masquerading behind such an email address/account, while pretending to be the long-time user of the said account for legitimacy, with the aid of those who benefit financially from such arrangements (see post CAN MY INVESTMENTS STAND UP TO INTENSE SCRUTINY? ). PLEASE BE ADVISED ACCORDINGLY.