tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post8683494555814898759..comments2023-09-10T05:53:34.299-05:00Comments on SociAllMedia Issues: PRACTICAL INVOLVEMENT CANNOT BE ASSUMED SIMPLY WITH LABELS AND NUMBERS J_F_Brazanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post-41882626534706097722012-12-23T14:16:10.793-06:002012-12-23T14:16:10.793-06:00Could it be that the reason why this con artist an...Could it be that the reason why this con artist and his Supporters aren’t concerned about the SEC is related to that $33 million “sweetheart” settlement deal worked out between that Agency and BofA in 2009, (which absorbed the former Chemical Bank) through, which my finances were arranged while in attendance at Pratt - see the post ARBIRARY aCTION OR IS IT? - link on COMMENTS 2 Page, to settle claims of “materially lying”, by that Institution? J_F_Brazanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post-70429329062982612082012-12-23T14:00:43.042-06:002012-12-23T14:00:43.042-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.J_F_Brazanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post-10020354544317872562012-12-21T11:52:18.104-06:002012-12-21T11:52:18.104-06:00The lives of individuals aren’t objects to be trea...The lives of individuals aren’t objects to be treated as M&A targets, to bring about “distressed” conditions (via layoff), and then follow-up with “vulture” tactics to force an individual to “give up” his identity, accomplishments and qualifications (via quid pro quo deal-making to bring about the “Exporting” of records to transfer) and to prop those willing to pay “Society’s” types for easy “credibility”, (with perpetual wealth-generation as their main objective). The same “thin” standards individuals using these predatory methods can’t take competition in any form and resort to brandishing their “awesome” reputations to “scare away” potential competitors, routinely.J_F_Brazanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post-5626527616530050902012-12-19T06:31:24.862-06:002012-12-19T06:31:24.862-06:00“Society’s” types “thin” to zero standards and bra...“Society’s” types “thin” to zero standards and brandish themselves as doing whatever it takes, however, in the “real” world where actual standards exist all actions have consequences. Since there is a con artist now running around claiming to be James F. Brazant for “credibility”, my question especially since he is claiming to have worked in my identity, is the following, WHEN DID HE RESIGN FROM HIS DIRECTOR POSITION INFORM THE SEC WITHIN “FOUR” (4) DAYS AND TOOK UP HIS NEW POSITION IN MY IDENTITY? Since they are an abundance of photos and SEC filings documenting this con artist in one identity as a “DIRECTOR” utility circles, (including EPRI) this con artist must comply with SEC requirements in this regard because such an action requires SEC disclosure. Please find out when this disclosure took place, because in the US, not a country known for ITS WEAK DISCLOUSURE STANDARDS, ACCOUNTABILITY IS NEEDED AND ANY CON ARTIST MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS SUDDEN DROPPING OF ONE NAME AND USE OF ANOTHER OTHERWISE, THE PRECEDENT BEING SET IS THAT THE SEC IS ALLOWING THE “WEAK” DISCLOSURE STANDARDS OF SOME SPECIFIC COUNTRIES TO RULE IN THE USA. THIS IS NOT A REPUTATION THEY WANT TO FOSTER, IN MY OPINION. J_F_Brazanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.com