tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post8264969594257997610..comments2023-09-10T05:53:34.299-05:00Comments on SociAllMedia Issues: UPDATED ADDENDUM TO REMAINING NEUTRAL UNTIL ALL THE FACTS (FROM BOTH SIDES) ARE EVALUATEDJ_F_Brazanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3996498670593349919.post-36198087610339807652012-07-06T09:09:51.460-05:002012-07-06T09:09:51.460-05:00It’s adding insult to injury (metaphorically) when...It’s adding insult to injury (metaphorically) when your principled decisions made on matters of importance such as “Citizenship” - see excerpt from THE GATEKEEPERS OF THE “VIRTUAL” SOCIETY below: <br />Before answering that question, I just want to take the time to mention for those who may have wondered why I never chose to become a naturalize citizen and after the allotted time set out after becoming a permanent resident (circa 1990’s before relocating to Iowa) this process was examined. However, in all fairness after reviewing the criteria, which included renouncing ties to your place of birth, (which I took literally and was unsure how this could be implemented, I decided against going forward and pretending outwardly that all ties to the land of my birth could somehow be severed with the waving of “magic wand”). My choice was not made out of “arrogance” as some have suggested, but out of regard for your process and not wanting to convey that my “roots” could be severed whimsically. This did not prevent me from giving back to society when I was in a position to (see the Description of the The Lighthouse Project Corporation On the Conservery Proprietorship Page) and am still doing it in another manner by this Blog. Having experienced the methods (see ARBITRARY ACTION, OR IS IT?) of “citizens” considered pillars of the society; I am not concerned with being considered an outsider in the land of my chosen residence.<br /><br />are capitalized on to give this individual the citizenship he could not attain in his “other selected” name and in the “Society” determination, it has “killed two birds with a single stone”. This action, helped this particular State described in the above post cover-up their “Hearing Experimentation”<br /> problem and in the process eliminated Vermont’s then Community National Savings Bank problem (in their estimation), by making me “trapped” with a “target not only my back”, but also on my children as well as those acquaintances who could raise identity fraud alarms. Their crowning achievement is to award such an individual two of New York State’s highest awards, to justify their action (see the post SOCIALLMEDIA ISSUES - a EXAMPLE OF RECONCILLATION - UPDATED - link on COMMENTS Page). This is the reason why New York had such a high hurdle for me to consider and justify considering as relocation destination, because he has NO legitimate connection to this State or even how he entered the Country (otherwise he wouldn’t be hiding in my identity/accomplishments).J_F_Brazanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06816847679613152010noreply@blogger.com